Is oil spill also fouling the air?

Jun 29, 2010 by Janet Wilson
A fixed-wing aircraft releases dispersant over the oil spill off Louisiana’s Gulf Coast. More than 156, 000 gallons of dispersant have been dropped, and it’s being eyed as a possible source of the high levels of airborne chemicals detected in the area.

(PhysOrg.com) -- UCI researchers find disturbing amounts of certain gases above massive Gulf slick. More study is needed.

Record levels of potentially have been detected by UC Irvine researchers in the around the BP oil spill in the . While the findings are preliminary, they illustrate a critical need for further testing.

“There are lots of hydrocarbons rising from all this muck,” says Donald Blake, chemistry department chair. “What we don’t know is whether this air came from somewhere else or is bubbling up from below.”

He and Nobel laureate chemist F. Sherwood Rowland are poring over data collected during recent plane flights and boat trips through the spill area. Air samples from about 400 canisters are being scrutinized.

The concentrations of certain chemicals exceed any they’ve found before, Blake says, including over Mexico City, Oklahoma oil tank farms and other heavily polluted urban areas. “This is more alkyl nitrates than we’ve ever seen,” says the professor of chemistry and Earth system science. “These are much higher levels than in Los Angeles.”

The amounts detected, however, are lower than safety thresholds established by regulators.

The U.S. has been testing the air for different substances, namely smog and soot-related pollutants. Conditions have ranged from “good” to “unhealthy for sensitive groups,” according to its reports.

The Occupational Safety & Health Administration, which is overseeing worker safety in the spill area, also monitors air quality. “We have found no exposure levels to any chemicals that are of any concern,” says Jordan Barab, deputy assistant secretary of labor for OSHA.

The UCI team is examining evidence of so-called atmospheric gases rather than diesel soot particles or other pollutants linked to the burn-off of spilled oil. The alkyl nitrates, methane, and hexane and butane compounds they’ve identified could be from oil rising to the surface, the dispersant used to break it up or other unknown sources.

Blake and Rowland, Donald Bren Research Professor in chemistry and Earth system science, say they’re frustrated by insufficient funding and government coordination of air testing above the massive slick, particularly amid news reports about cleanup crews and oil workers feeling sick. Certain alkyl nitrates can irritate or burn skin and eyes, according to recent studies, and concentrated vapors can cause dizziness or suffocation.

While the amounts of individual gases might not reach official risk levels, the unknown effects of the combined swirl of chemicals are a concern. “Somebody should be tasked with a very thorough study of these gases,” says Blake. “There are millions of gallons of oil under the surface. What happens next month if a huge blob rises to the surface?”

The UCI researchers cobbled together limited university, state and federal funding for their initial work. In May, they loaded testing canisters onto a high-altitude plane but found surprisingly few chemicals.

The team then chartered the Eugenia, a fishing boat out of Houma, La., whose captain filled more canisters for them, making sure to do it away from the vessel’s engine. (He threw in a bottle of gunk-filled water for good measure; Blake says he may test the air in that as well.) This time, spikes of heavier gases hovering close to the water were detected.

In early June, the scientists contacted the EPA and the National Oceanic & Atmospheric Administration about their preliminary results. EPA officials have not responded, but NOAA followed up with a monitoring flight of its own over the area. Nearly 100 UCI canisters were tucked next to that plane’s radar system to harvest additional air samples.

The UCI chemists are now teasing out which of several hundred possible airborne pollutants are present above the oil spill and its miles-long plumes.

Rowland is particularly interested in a high methane reading near a finger of land along Louisiana’s Gulf Coast. Other chemicals detected include benzene, toluene and xylenes.

“There needs to be some government agency coordinating this effort,” says Blake. “Monitoring should be required for years.”

Explore further: Muddy forests, shorter winters present challenges for loggers

Related Stories

BP relaunches subsea dispersant operations

May 11, 2010

BP restarted Monday operations to stream dispersants directly into the main Gulf of Mexico oil leak despite fears the chemicals could themselves be harmful to the environment.

Oil spill stirs study, debate over health impacts

Jun 21, 2010

(AP) -- When an Associated Press reporter went scuba diving in the oil-streaked Gulf of Mexico this month, people commenting on websites worried about his health. But at the same time, the oil sure didn't ...

Recommended for you

Rising anger as Nicaragua canal to break ground

Dec 21, 2014

As a conscripted soldier during the Contra War of the 1980s, Esteban Ruiz used to flee from battles because he didn't want to have to kill anyone. But now, as the 47-year-old farmer prepares to fight for ...

Hopes, fears, doubts surround Cuba's oil future

Dec 20, 2014

One of the most prolific oil and gas basins on the planet sits just off Cuba's northwest coast, and the thaw in relations with the United States is giving rise to hopes that Cuba can now get in on the action.

User comments : 3

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

akotlar
5 / 5 (2) Jun 29, 2010
Nice article, but I wonder how there could even be a question of this. 128 people working on the spill developed also sorts of contact allergies and respiratory illnesses. Combined with the fact that ~50m barrels of oil have spilled into a slick the size of Nebraska, with all the volatile hydrocarbon fumes one would expect from an oil spill. Oh yeah, combine that with Cortexit and its 2ppm toxicity level (ok that was the old stuff, not sure what ppm toxicity is from the "safe" Cortexit).
bluecanary82
3 / 5 (2) Jun 29, 2010
(translated) Titan's explorer has recently returned with samples from Earth. Earth is the third planet from the Sun and has a rich hydrocarbon atmosphere much like our own. Scientists hope to answer the question of whether or not life exists or existed there with subsequent tests..
newsreader
1 / 5 (2) Jun 30, 2010

Whats really amazing about this is how Obama stands by and does nothing. What a joke.

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more

Click here to reset your password.
Sign in to get notified via email when new comments are made.