Survey challenges popular beliefs about high-tech startup patents

Jun 23, 2010

(PhysOrg.com) -- A new survey of high-technology entrepreneurs finds that patents provide less incentive to innovate than popularly believed, but offer tangible benefits by limiting competition, attracting financing, and increasing the chances of an acquisition or IPO.

The , High and the System: Results of the 2008 Berkeley Patent Survey, was conducted by the University of California, Berkeley, School of Law’s Berkeley Center for Law & Technology (BCLT). The research center surveyed chief executive and technology officers of more than 1,300 software, biotech, medical devices, and computer hardware startup firms founded within the past decade.

The survey results show that patents are more widespread among startups than has been previously reported, while the reasons for acquiring patents differ across industries. Patents are more common and more highly valued in biotechnology and medical device startups than in early-stage software and Internet firms.

“Biotech and medical device startup companies regard patents as key for attaining competitive advantage from their innovations,” said report co-author and Berkeley Law professor Pamela Samuelson. “Software entrepreneurs, on the other hand, find it’s much more critical to move fast in the marketplace and to use copyright and trademark protections. Patents take a back seat.”

Traditional theory says that patents provide an incentive to invent. But startups from all industries reported that patents provide relatively weak to moderate—rather than strong—incentives to create, develop, and commercialize technology. In fact, a large share of software startups avoid the altogether. Among those companies that do seek patents, the primary reasons are to reduce competition and attract investment capital.

“This capital formation finding is noteworthy, because it’s an aspect of the patent system that has not been systematically established and explored in prior research,” said co-author and Berkeley Law professor Robert Merges.

The Berkeley Law survey is the first major study of the impact of patents on entrepreneurship in the United States. As a result, “the paper develops a deeper and much more nuanced picture of the role of patents for new ventures than exists anywhere else in the literature,” said UC Berkeley professor Richard Gilbert, former head of a patent licensing project at the Justice Department.

Across industries, the survey found the single most common deterrent to seeking patents was the cost of acquisition and enforcement. One policy implication, suggest the co-authors, is to make patents less expensive for early-stage firms.

The survey also found more licensing-in of patented technology than has been reported by other studies. “In most cases, these licenses bring in new technologies and know-how, though some are signed only to settle threatened lawsuits,” said Merges. “This suggests that patents may help in some way to establish technology markets, and that licensing is not primarily about avoiding litigation."

Survey results include the following:

• patents are far more prevalent in biotech than in software startups;

• the average firm holds about five patents and applications (4.7), while the average venture-backed firm holds nearly four times that (18.7);

• venture-backed firms are much more patent-intensive, even in software, where 70 percent of venture-backed firms hold at least 1 patent and nearly 50 percent hold 10 or more patents and applications;

• on average, survey respondents said patents offer a "moderate" incentive to innovate in biotechnology, and only a "slight" incentive to innovate in software;

• patenting is rated first as a way to boost competitive advantage by biotechnology companies, and a close second for medical device startups (just behind first-mover advantage), but is rated last by software and Internet startups;

• startups report that patents provide valuable benefits, such as:

o limiting competition in product markets;
o helping to attract investment capital;
o building technology portfolios to enhance the prospects of an or acquisition;
o enhancing firm reputation; and
o providing opportunities for licensing royalties.

Patent reform is the subject of a vigorous national debate. While opinions of large corporations and the patent bar have been clearly expressed, there’s been little discussion of how the proposed changes will affect entrepreneurship.

“The high costs of getting and enforcing a patent make the system unaffordable to many high-tech startups,” said Horacio Gutierrez of Microsoft Corporation. “Yet patents play a key role in attracting capital investments for early-stage firms, and consequently in their business viability at a key stage of development. The Berkeley Law survey illustrates the need to reform the patent system at all levels of government to make it truly accessible to high-tech entrepreneurs.”

High Technology Entrepreneurs and the Patent System will be published this summer in the Berkeley Technology Law Journal.

Explore further: Highly connected CEOs more likely to broker mergers and acquisitions that harm firms

add to favorites email to friend print save as pdf

Related Stories

Samsung And Sony To Share Patent Portofolios

Dec 14, 2004

Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd. and Sony Corporation have signed a Cross-License Agreement on December 14, detailing mutual usage of patent portfolios owned by the two companies. ...

Nokia announces patent support to the Linux Kernel

May 26, 2005

Nokia Corporation announced today that it allows all its patents to be used in the further development of the Linux Kernel. Nokia believes that open source software communities, like open standards, foster innovation and ...

EU revises position on software patents

Jun 05, 2006

Is software patentable in Europe? Following questioning from a member of the European parliament, the European Commission recently released a statement containing strong implications that computer programs aren't patentable, ...

U.S. rejects three stem cell patents

Apr 04, 2007

The U.S. Patent and Trademark Office has issued a preliminary rejection of three stem cell patents held by the University of Wisconsin-Madison.

German inventors more active in 2004

Aug 01, 2005

The number of inventions in Germany significantly increased last year, the German daily Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung reported Monday.

Recommended for you

Migrant employment on the rise

Oct 20, 2014

Skilled migrants are enjoying better jobs and higher levels of employment thanks to a shift in policy, according to a new study by the Melbourne Institute of Applied Economic and Social Research at the University ...

Three hours of life per euro

Oct 15, 2014

Public spending appears to have contributed substantially to the fact that life expectancy in eastern Germany has not only increased, but is now almost equivalent to life expectancy in the west. While the possible connection ...

User comments : 2

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

bottomlesssoul
not rated yet Jun 23, 2010
I have several patents all of which were applied for against my wishes and all forcibly sold to the particular company I was working for at the time for $1. In fact they explained very clearly to me that it was better for them than me signing a non-compete contract were I to leave them.

It was explicit that the IP creator was not only not given any portion of the 'P' in IP, they were also only allowed to advance the technology further under the auspices of the 'P' owner.

I personally never liked the level of control over my working life so I left every time and never did anything to advance the underlying technology. Others had to do that not me.
Gena777
not rated yet Jul 06, 2010
Concerns about the cost of patent acquisition present a good argument for reforming the patent law system in favor of a multi-tiered approach that gives different degrees of patent rights to different types of patents (and would, correspondingly, charge different fees). In any case, it is clear that the traditional patent law structure is no longer meeting our contemporary needs. Unfortunately, I'm not sure Congress is capable of enacting meaningful patent reform, so we may have to rely on USPTO Director David Kappos to do the dirty work.
http://www.genera...-clients