Geochemist raises questions about carbon sequestration

Jun 16, 2010

As carbon dioxide levels in the atmosphere rise, policy makers and scientists are looking at new ways to tackle the problems associated with the greenhouse gas.

One method under much discussion is carbon capture and storage (CCS), otherwise known as carbon sequestration. CCS, a newly developing technology, involves injecting carbon dioxide underground to remove it from the Earth's atmosphere.

Donald J. DePaolo, a distinguished geochemist from the University of California, Berkeley and the Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, raised new questions about carbon sequestration today during the Goldschmidt Conference hosted by the University of Tennessee, Knoxville, and Oak Ridge National Laboratory.

DePaolo's presentation focused on the significance of geochemistry in analyzing the effectiveness of proposed carbon sequestration. He examined how current plans for carbon storage could benefit by paying more attention to the critical role of underground . For instance, when carbon dioxide comes into contact with water in underground aquifers, it can form a weak acid that will start to dissolve minerals in the rocks. According to DePaolo, research is needed to analyze how fast such reactions proceed and which minerals are affected to better gauge the efficiency of carbon storage projects.

DePaolo's presentation, entitled " geochemistry," aims to open encouragement for other geochemists to start addressing the importance of geochemical questions in programs.

Explore further: Drought may take toll on Congo rainforest, study finds

Provided by University of Tennessee at Knoxville

3 /5 (6 votes)
add to favorites email to friend print save as pdf

Related Stories

Trapping Greenhouse Gases (Without Leaks)

Nov 19, 2008

Of all the possible ways of reducing future greenhouse gas emissions, one of the most immediately feasible is carbon dioxide "sequestration," which involves compressing the gas into a liquid and piping it deep underground ...

Carbon capture has a sparkling future

Apr 01, 2009

(PhysOrg.com) -- New research shows that for millions of years carbon dioxide has been stored safely and naturally in underground water in gas fields saturated with the greenhouse gas. The findings - published ...

Storage of carbon dioxide a vexed question

Sep 15, 2009

In Sweden alone, 52 million tons of carbon dioxide is emitted every year. To mitigate the negative impacts of greenhouse gases, carbon dioxide sequestration has come to the fore as a hot new method. However, the process is ...

Burying crop residues at sea may help reduce global warming

Feb 02, 2009

Imagine a massive international effort to combat global warming by reducing carbon dioxide - build up in the atmosphere. It involves gathering billions of tons of cornstalks, wheat straw, and other crop residue from farm ...

Scientists develop tech to track carbon dioxide

Jun 14, 2010

(AP) -- Scientists have developed a method for detecting and tracking carbon dioxide deep underground, giving the federal government an important tool as people look for ways to keep carbon dioxide and other greenhouse gases ...

Recommended for you

Drought may take toll on Congo rainforest, study finds

13 hours ago

(Phys.org) —A new analysis of NASA satellite data shows Africa's Congo rainforest, the second-largest tropical rainforest in the world, has undergone a large-scale decline in greenness over the past decade.

User comments : 4

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

Shootist
5 / 5 (2) Jun 16, 2010
Nothing needs to be done to sequester carbon. The extant processes work just fine. Especially since Carbon does not drive warming. As we all know from the FACTS; atmospheric CO2 increases after the warming episodes, not before.
SteveL
5 / 5 (1) Jun 16, 2010
So, if I just let my lawn grow, can I call it "Carbon Sequestration" and tell my neighbors that I'm just trying to save the planet? (Ranther than just being too darn lazy to care for my lawn.)
emergent
5 / 5 (1) Jun 16, 2010
Nothing needs to be done to sequester carbon. The extant processes work just fine. Especially since Carbon does not drive warming. As we all know from the FACTS; atmospheric CO2 increases after the warming episodes, not before.


nice to see people who understand the cause effect reality. CO2 is an effect not a cause of warming. kudos to you!
Choice
not rated yet Jun 18, 2010
NB: Warming is not the only problem with excessive atmospheric carbon.

More news stories

On global warming, settled science and George Brandis

The Australian Attorney General, Senator George Brandis is no stranger to controversy. His statement in parliament that "people do have a right to be bigots" rapidly gained him notoriety, and it isn't hard to understand why ...

When things get glassy, molecules go fractal

Colorful church windows, beads on a necklace and many of our favorite plastics share something in common—they all belong to a state of matter known as glasses. School children learn the difference between ...

FCC to propose pay-for-priority Internet standards

The Federal Communications Commission is set to propose new open Internet rules that would allow content companies to pay for faster delivery over the so-called "last mile" connection to people's homes.