Governments 'misjudging' scale of CO2 emissions

Feb 21, 2010

Policy makers in Europe and United States are markedly underestimating the changes needed to mitigate CO2 emission required to prevent dangerous climate change because they work in 'silos', according to pioneering research.

Dr Sebastian Carney, from The University of Manchester, discovered that the lack of communication between government departments, NGOs and other authorities has resulted in significant differences over who is responsible for what.

He will describe his work at the prestigious 2010 American Association for the Advancement of Science Annual Meeting on 21 February in San Diego.

Using special computer software he developed at The University of Manchester, Dr Carney has worked with authorities in England, Scotland and California to troubleshoot the way they calculate emissions reductions.

The 'scenario sessions' bring together national and local politicians, council officers, and NGOs - among others - to discuss their approaches to emissions.

"When it becomes evident that policy makers, and energy planners are vastly underestimating the scale of the problem, the universal reaction is one of shock.

"In most cases, they have never sat down and quantified their energy futures in terms of changes in CO2," said Dr Carney, who is based at University's Centre for Urban Regional Ecology.

The United Nation's International Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) and the European Commission both say a CO2 reduction of at least 80% on 1990 emission levels by 2050 will be required to limit the average global temperature rise to 2 degrees centigrade.

But according to Dr Carney, Governments do not realise the extent of the work needed to achieve the 80 per cent figure.

He said: "Because they have not played with their own numbers, policy makers just don't realise the scale of the changes needed to deliver the reductions required.

"But they for sure are taking this issue seriously - which is why we have together created the EUCO2 project."

The software - called 'GRIP' - blends in real time, different quantities and types of energy consumed with economy size, population and general behaviour to illustrate the effects of different scenarios on CO2 emissions.

The EUCO2 project, to which Dr Carney is Scientific Advisor, devises low carbon urban strategies for cities in Spain, Germany, Sweden, Norway, Finland, Netherlands, France, Slovakia, Italy, Portugal and the UK.

He said: "The scenario process is for the first time identifying problems and getting them out into the open. Then it's possible to do something positive.

"They leave with either their own views reinforced—or with a whole new set of insights."

He added: "What they don't need is to be berated and criticised, we all want a solution and to do so as quickly as possible.

"But certainly joined up thinking is vital if we are going to deliver the necessary reductions in emissions."

Explore further: Isolated indigenous communities of South America under threat

More information: Visit GRIP (Greenhouse Gas Regional Inventory Project) at www.grip.org.uk and EUCO2 www.euCO2.org ; www.euCO2.eu for more details.

add to favorites email to friend print save as pdf

Related Stories

Pollution figures put Europe under spotlight

Jun 23, 2009

European policy makers must collaborate more closely in the fight against global warming, according to a leading expert who compiled the most detailed ever record of greenhouse gas emissions across the continent.

Reducing CO2 through technology and smart growth

Feb 11, 2009

A Georgia Tech City and Regional Planning study on climate change, published February 10, 2009 online by Environmental Science and Technology, shows that "smart growth" combined with the use of hybrid vehicl ...

MIT sees acceleration in US greenhouse emissions

Nov 19, 2007

U.S. greenhouse gas emissions could grow more quickly in the next 50 years than in the previous half-century, and technological change may cause increased emissions rather than control them, according to a new study by an ...

Recommended for you

Big data confirms climate extremes are here to stay

37 minutes ago

In a paper published online today in the journal Scientific Reports, published by Nature, Northeastern researchers Evan Kodra and Auroop Ganguly found that while global temperature is indeed increasing, so too is the variab ...

Peru's carbon quantified: Economic and conservation boon

47 minutes ago

Today scientists unveiled the first high-resolution map of the carbon stocks stored on land throughout the entire country of Perú. The new and improved methodology used to make the map marks a sea change ...

How might climate change affect our food supply?

1 hour ago

It's no easy question to answer, but prudence demands that we try. Thus, Microsoft and the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) have teamed up to tackle "food resilience," one of several themes ...

Groundwater is safe in potential N.Y. fracking area

2 hours ago

Two Cornell hydrologists have completed a thorough groundwater examination of drinking water in a potential hydraulic fracturing area in New York's Southern Tier. They determined that drinking water in potable ...

User comments : 3

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

Loodt
2.3 / 5 (6) Feb 22, 2010
So, the politicians bought the sound bites, 'low carbon', without realising the huge costs involved and how thin the science is on which it was based.

Stupid politicians, no surprise!

Cheating Climate Change scientists, obviously!

Reducing the temperature increase by 2 degrees; sure, give me you money and bring your virgins, as false prophets, we should be rewarded, and buy my smutty book on the way out!
operator
3.7 / 5 (3) Mar 06, 2010
nice, bringing in religious inults into a post.

sound bites, thats a tactic taken by the media to capture a dumbed down, generally scientifically literate public right.

loodt i'm reading a lot of your posts having a certain religious zeal to them, you post the same kind of themed response to stories concerning climate change, comparing it to a religion, you have seen the recent report thats found rightwing christians have a averaged lower IQ the leftwing atheistists yes, i think this applies to you somewhat.

no real engagement about the science, politics, human rights or economics involved in these issues, just insults and derisions.
well if your going to insult then you should really expect it back
Loodt
1 / 5 (3) Mar 06, 2010
Operator,

I've got permission from my parole officer to work on this machine.

Does your mommy know you are talking to big boys?

You missed paedophile from your list of insults; sloppy work!

And you know that in Richard Dawkins's 'The Ancestors Tale' he mentions the study (graph on page 75) that showed that the size of nuts is inversely proportional to the size of brains in mammals. Now following the impeccable climate science reasoning: seeing that you told me in no uneasy terms that I am an idiot, it follows that I am better endowed than you; sad for you.