Waking the dead: Ancient genome of extinct human being reconstructed

Feb 10, 2010
Drawing of Inuk -- reconstruction. Credit: Nuka Godfredtsen

For the first time, scientists have reconstructed the nuclear genome of an extinct human being. The innovative technique can help reconstruct human phenotypic traits of extinct cultures. It also allows for finding those contemporary populations most closely related to extinct cultures revealing ancient human expansions and migrations. Finally, the discovery improves our understanding of heredity and the disease risk passed down from our ancestors. The spectacular findings are being published in Nature.

Professor Eske Willerslev and his PhD student Morten Rasmussen, from Centre of Excellence in GeoGenetics, The Natural History Museum at the University of Copenhagen, Denmark, led the international team of scientists responsible for the findings.

Professor Willerslev,38 , and his team grabbed international attention last year when they reconstructed the complete mitochondrial genomes of a woolly mammoth and an . However, the current discovery is the first time scientists have been able to reconstruct the 80% of the nuclear genome that is possible to retrieve from fossil remains. From the genomic sequences, the team has managed to construct a picture of a male individual who lived in Greenland 4,000 years ago and belonged to the first culture to settle in the New World Arctic.

The discovery was made by analysing a tuft of hair that belonged to a man from the Saqqaq culture from north-western Greenland 4,000 years ago. The scientists have named the ancient human "Inuk", which means "man" or "human" in Greenlandic. Although Inuk is more closely related to contemporary north-eastern Siberian tribes than to modern Inuits of the present day New World Arctic, the scientists wants to acknowledge that the discovery was made in Greenland.

Professor Willerslev discovered the existence of the hair tuft by coincidence after several unsuccessful attempts to find early human remains in Greenland

"I was speaking with the Director of the Natural History Museum in Denmark, Dr. Morten Meldgaard, when we started discussing the early peopling of the Arctic," Willerslev recalls. "Meldgaard who had participated in several excavations in Greenland told me about a large tuft of hair, which was found during an excavation in north-western Greenland in the 1980's and now stored at the National Museum in Denmark.

"After the National Museum and Archives granted permission, we analysed the hair for DNA using various techniques and found it to be from a human male. For several months, we were uncertain as to whether our efforts would be fruitful. However, through the hard work of a large international team, we finally managed to sequence the first complete genome of an extinct human.", Willerslev says.

Willerslev adds: "It was crucial that a private person, Fredrik Paulsen, chairman of the medical company Ferring, became interested in the project and provided the necessary funding to run some pilot tests, and that The Lundbeck Foundation of Denmark, quickly followed up providing substantial economic support to complete the project".

"It shows how crucial private funding is to basic science these days. Without these private donors it would have taken us a lot longer to sequence the first ancient human genome".

The reconstruction serves as blueprint that scientists can use to give a description of how the pre-historic Greenlander, Inuk, looked - including his tendency to baldness, dry earwax, brown eyes, dark skin, the blood type A+, shovel-shaped front teeth, and that he was genetically adapted to cold temperatures, and to what extend he was predisposed to certain illnesses. This is important as besides four small pieces of bone and hair, no human remains have been found of the first people that settled the New World Arctic. Willerslev's team can also reveal that Inuk's ancestors crossed into the New World from north-eastern Siberia between 4,400 and 6,400 years ago in a migration wave that was independent of those of Native Americans and Inuit ancestors. Thus, Inuk and his people left no dependence behind among contemporary indigenous people of the New World.

"Previous efforts to reconstruct the mammoth nuclear genome resulted in a sequence filled with gaps and errors due to DNA damage because the technology was in its infancy. The genome of Inuk is comparable in quality to that of a modern human ", Willerslev tells and continues:

"Our findings can be of significant help to archaeologists and others as they seek to determine what happened to people from extinct cultures. Doing so requires organic material - bones or hair kept as museum pieces or found at archaeological sites. Previously, the DNA needed to have been frozen or buried in a layer of permafrost. But with the new methods developed here at the Centre, that is not a premise anymore".

Much of the hands-on work analysing and joining the DNA sequences and the chemical analyses of what little was left of the damaged genetic material together to form a complete profile of Inuk was done by Morten Rasmussen. The work was carried out in close collaboration with other scientists at the University of Copenhagen and in China, where they have far more sequencing machines than in Denmark.

"Not so long ago, reconstructing an entire modern human genome took years," Rasmussen says. But the new methods and the abundance of sequencing machines allow us to do it in just a few months - and that includes the time-consuming task of analysing the results. The interesting thing about compiling a human genome is that we can look at the genes to see traits like why Scandinavians are blonde, why some are predisposed to certain illnesses and why others more easily become addicted to alcohol or tobacco. But the we've reconstructed is no Frankenstein's Monster; it's more like we've got the blueprints for a house, but we don't know how to build it."

Explore further: The origin of the language of life

Provided by University of Copenhagen

4.9 /5 (18 votes)

Related Stories

Rewriting Greenland's immigration history

May 29, 2008

The first immigrants in Greenland were not Indians from the North American continent or Canadian Inuit as previously suggested. And it is not just a question of revising the Greenlandic immigration history. The discovery ...

The mammoths' swan song revised

Dec 14, 2009

This is shown by samples of ancient DNA, analysed by an international team of research scientists under the leadership of Professor Eske Willerslev from Copenhagen University. Analyses of ancient DNA thereby ...

Hair of Tasmanian Tiger Yields Genes of Extinct Species

Jan 12, 2009

All the genes that the exotic Tasmanian Tiger inherited only from its mother will be revealed by an international team of scientists in a research paper to be published on 13 January 2009 in the online edition ...

Recommended for you

The origin of the language of life

21 hours ago

The genetic code is the universal language of life. It describes how information is encoded in the genetic material and is the same for all organisms from simple bacteria to animals to humans. However, the ...

Quest to unravel mysteries of our gene network

Dec 18, 2014

There are roughly 27,000 genes in the human body, all but a relative few of them connected through an intricate and complex network that plays a dominant role in shaping our physiological structure and functions.

EU court clears stem cell patenting

Dec 18, 2014

A human egg used to produce stem cells but unable to develop into a viable embryo can be patented, the European Court of Justice ruled on Thursday.

User comments : 6

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

wollaballa
not rated yet Feb 10, 2010
What makes them think this Inuk individual's DNA is extinct? Are there some signs that his Y-chromosome sequence is not extant in modern population? And even if his Y-chromosome isn't, how about his other DNA? Extinct means a line that has not produced offspring.

The article doesn't really match with the title. Why the title? Has studies been made to match Inuk's DNA with modern Greenlanders or Canadian arctic peoples? If so, why aren't they mentioned?

I'd like more rigorous scientific reporting, the standards have been slipping for so long, you can't trust any media on science news these days. Sometimes they report the excact opposite of what has been found.
Quantum_Conundrum
not rated yet Feb 10, 2010
The funny thing about "modern humans" is that "modern humans" range in size from a few feet tall to nearly 9ft tall for extreme cases. Even in the same family, height can vary drastically, sometimes by more than a foot.

I find it silly for this person's remains to be classified "extinct" when even just recently a totally unknown tribe of humans was found in South America that even with all this technology, nobody ever knew existed. Maybe these people are still around somewhere too?

The sketch there looks like excellent concept art from the Scorpion King movie, however...
TJ_alberta
not rated yet Feb 11, 2010
Next they are going to sequence a sabre tooth tiger, a giant ground sloth and a proto-squirrel.
Birger
5 / 5 (1) Feb 11, 2010
I believe "extinct" in this case means ancient remains of an individual from a culture that seems to have left no descendant culture.
Naturally, there will be some DNA passed along from these people to the people that supplanted them, such as immigrants (Inuits) intermarrying with the autochtones, the Saqqaq culture population.
The Saqqaq as a distinct population, however, do not exist any more. Hence "extinct".
El_Nose
not rated yet Feb 11, 2010
I have read a lot of articles suggesting that Neanderthals and modern man intermingled and interbred. It is absolutely tru that we both existed at the same time and at in many regions coexisted -- so cohabitation is certainly possible.

But I agree this is something we should not do... create organs, create pieces of the immune system -- but if you create a living sentient being then you take responsiblilty for them and that is something we cannot do... you cannot be responsible for a sentient being actions because they will grow up and be independent -- so cohabitation is not out of the question.

But can you take responsibility for new interspecies mingling -- for reintroducing this genome into the human population...

Cause if you created a Neanderthal -- you couldn't keep them locked up in a lab... they ARE sentient.

READ THIS..
http://www.physor...636.html
article on resquencing the DNA and creating the individual.
mauinut
not rated yet Feb 11, 2010
might we all have been hybridized primates created for the sole purpose of slavery? after all it seems humans learned it somewhere, sometime from someone. anything is possible, that it's probable is more relevant, but what the hell do I know anyway!

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more

Click here to reset your password.
Sign in to get notified via email when new comments are made.