Microsoft to patch 17-year-old bug

Feb 08, 2010 by Lin Edwards report
Microsoft to patch 17-year-old bug

(PhysOrg.com) -- Microsoft's February security update will include a patch for a bug that dates back to Windows NT 3.1, which was released in July 1993. The vulnerability has been present but undetected in every 32-bit version of Windows since 1993, including Windows XP, Vista, Windows 2000, Server 2003 and 2008, and the newest version: Windows 7.

A researcher for Google, Tavis Ormandy, found several flaws in the Virtual DOS Machine (VDM) utility that enables more recent releases of Windows to run old DOS and 16-bit software. The bug has the potential to enable an unprivileged 16-bit program to gain system privileged access level to the PC, which would allow attackers to get their own code to run. Ormandy found the bug and reported it to Microsoft over seven months ago and published a workaround, but a patch has not been ready until now.

The 17-year-old bug affects only Windows 32-bit versions and does not affect 64-bit machines, which does not have support for 16-bit applications. Microsoft has released a security advisory, which says the company is not aware of any attacks involving the , and most users are at low risk, apparently because local access to the computer is required.

Among the 25 other patches included in this month’s security update are five “critical” vulnerabilities that could allow an attacker to hijack a PC running Windows and force it to run their own programs. The update also fixes bugs in Microsoft Office 2003 and XP, and Office 2004 for Apple Macintosh.

Explore further: Facebook's Internet.org expands in Zambia

Related Stories

Upgrade to Windows 7? It all depends...

Oct 08, 2009

With Windows 7 scheduled for release Oct. 22, the question many readers will be asking is, "Should I upgrade?" The answer depends on your circumstances.

No News Is Big News for Sana Security

Apr 23, 2007

Sana Security today announced version 2.2 of the Primary Response SafeConnect anti-malware utility, which works exactly the same in Vista as in Windows XP.

Windows 7 is on sale. Should you buy it now?

Jul 08, 2009

(AP) -- Microsoft Corp.'s next installment of Windows doesn't launch until October, but deep discounts on some versions are available through Saturday if you want to pre-order. Before pouncing on this deal, ...

Recommended for you

Facebook's Internet.org expands in Zambia

10 hours ago

(AP)—Facebook's Internet.org project is taking another step toward its goal of bringing the Internet to people who are not yet online with an app launching Thursday in Zambia.

Body by smartphone

Jul 30, 2014

We love our smartphones. Since they marched out of the corporate world and into the hands of consumers about 10 years ago, we've relied more and more on our iPhone and Android devices to organize our schedules, ...

Breakthrough elastic cloud-to cloud networking

Jul 30, 2014

Scientists from AT&T, IBM and Applied Communication Sciences (ACS) announced a proof-of-concept technology that reduces set up times for cloud-to-cloud connectivity from days to seconds. This advance is a major step forward ...

Security CTO to detail Android Fake ID flaw at Black Hat

Jul 29, 2014

Where have you heard this before: A team of security researchers discover a security flaw in Android devices. This is, however, news. This time, experts are talking about a flaw that involves a widespread ...

User comments : 4

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

Skeptic_Heretic
5 / 5 (1) Feb 08, 2010
The SETHC.exe bug is still around, even after this patch.

I wouldn't really say it's been fixed, just prevented from having network access.
axemaster
5 / 5 (1) Feb 08, 2010
I'm still waiting for the biggest bug to be removed from Windows... the BLOAT.

I would love if they could sell a stripped down version of Windows, where it supports graphics, but gets rid of all those useless services and processes that eat the computer alive. I mean, what does it tell you when a system from 5 years ago runs at the same speed as one from 2010???
Quantum_Conundrum
not rated yet Feb 08, 2010
Axemaster:

I was just talking about that earlier today.

Excluding video games and maybe graphics editors and sound editors, a windows 95 system ends up running about the same speed as a modern system with modern OS...because the software keeps getting written worse and worse, with more and more "crap nobody wants" added to it...
KingDWS
not rated yet Feb 08, 2010
I've been looking for something that functions similar to what you could do with the old batch files. Using one installation of windows something that would allow selective boot configs. For example one that allows max memi=ory and graphics but gets rid of network, encryption, print services etc etc. That might be for a game or using solidworks. There are sometimes when I want to run all of the junk but a lot of time have to spend a few minutes killing everything to max out the system. Someone figure this one out and they will come. I don't think most people realize just how bloated windows can be until they reinstall or use a differeant os on the same hardware. It can be a eyeopener.