'Quantum Logic Clock' Based on Aluminum Ion is Now World's Most Precise Clock (w/ Video)

Feb 04, 2010
The ion trap where the main action takes place in the NIST aluminum ion clock. The aluminum ion and partner magnesium ion sit in the slit running down the center of the device between the electrodes. Credit: NIST

(PhysOrg.com) -- Physicists at the National Institute of Standards and Technology have built an enhanced version of an experimental atomic clock based on a single aluminum atom that is now the world’s most precise clock, more than twice as precise as the previous pacesetter based on a mercury atom.

The new clock would neither gain nor lose one second in about 3.7 billion years, according to measurements to be reported in .

The new clock is the second version of NIST’s “quantum logic clock,” so called because it borrows the logical processing used for atoms storing data in experimental quantum computing, another major focus of the same NIST research group. The second version of the logic clock offers more than twice the precision of the original.

“This paper is a milestone for atomic clocks” for a number of reasons, says NIST postdoctoral researcher James Chou, who developed most of the improvements.

In addition to demonstrating that aluminum is now a better timekeeper than mercury, the latest results confirm that optical clocks are widening their lead—in some respects—over the NIST-F1 cesium fountain clock, the U.S. civilian time standard, which currently keeps time to within 1 second in about 100 million years.

Because the international definition of the second (in the International System of Units, or SI) is based on the , cesium remains the “ruler” for official timekeeping, and no clock can be more accurate than cesium-based standards such as NIST-F1.

The logic clock is based on a single aluminum ion (electrically charged atom) trapped by electric fields and vibrating at ultraviolet light frequencies, which are 100,000 times higher than microwave frequencies used in NIST-F1 and other similar time standards around the world. Optical clocks thus divide time into smaller units, and could someday lead to time standards more than 100 times as accurate as today’s microwave standards. Higher frequency is one of a variety of factors that enables improved precision and accuracy.

Aluminum is one contender for a future time standard to be selected by the international community. NIST scientists are working on five different types of experimental optical clocks, each based on different atoms and offering its own advantages. NIST’s construction of a second, independent version of the logic clock proves it can be replicated, making it one of the first optical clocks to achieve that distinction. Any future time standard will need to be reproduced in many laboratories.

NIST scientists evaluated the new logic clock by probing the aluminum ion with a laser to measure the exact "resonant" frequency at which the ion jumps to a higher-energy state, carefully accounting for all possible deviations such as those caused by ion motions. No measurement is perfect, so the clock’s precision is determined based on how closely repeated measurements can approach the atom’s exact resonant frequency. The smaller the deviations from the true value of the resonant frequency, the higher the precision of the clock.

Physicists also evaluate the performance of new optical clocks by comparing them to older optical clocks. In this case, NIST scientists compared their two logic clocks by using the resonant laser frequency from one clock to probe the ion in the other clock. Fifty-six separate comparisons were made, each lasting between 15 minutes and 3 hours.

The two logic clocks exhibit virtually identical “tick” rates—differences don’t show up until measurements are extended to 17 decimal places. The agreement between the two aluminum clocks is more than 10 times closer than any previous two-clock comparison, with the lowest measurement uncertainty ever achieved in such an evaluation, according to the paper.

The enhanced logic clock differs from the original version in several ways. Most importantly, it uses a different type of “partner” ion to enable more efficient operations. Aluminum is an exceptionally stable source of clock ticks but its properties are not easily manipulated or detected with lasers. In the new clock, a magnesium ion is used to cool the aluminum and to signal its ticks. The original version of the clock used beryllium, a smaller and lighter ion that is a less efficient match for aluminum.

Clocks have myriad applications. The extreme precision offered by optical clocks is already providing record measurements of possible changes in the fundamental “constants” of nature, a line of inquiry that has important implications for cosmology and tests of the laws of physics, such as Einstein’s theories of special and general relativity. Next-generation clocks might lead to new types of gravity sensors for exploring underground natural resources and fundamental studies of the Earth. Other possible applications may include ultra-precise autonomous navigation, such as landing planes by GPS.

This video is not supported by your browser at this time.
Animation of NIST logic clock. Credit: Greg Kuebler/JILA

Background: Where the ‘Quantum Logic Clock’ Gets Its Name

The NIST clock is so named because it borrows techniques that are key to quantum computers, which would solve problems using quantum mechanics, nature’s instruction book for the smallest particles of matter and light. Logic is reasoning that determines an action or result based on which one of different possible options is received as input. In the NIST clock, the input options are two different quantum states, or internal energy levels, of an aluminum ion. Information about this state is transferred to a beryllium ion, which, depending on the input, produces different signals that are easily detected.

NIST scientists use lasers to cool the two ions which are held 4 thousandths of a millimeter apart in an electromagnetic trap. Aluminum is the larger of the two ions, while the beryllium emits light under the conditions of this experiment. Scientists hit the ions with pulses from a “clock laser” within a narrow frequency range. If the laser frequency is at the center of the frequency range, the precise “resonance frequency” of aluminum, this ion jumps to a higher energy level, or 1 in the binary language of computers. Otherwise, the ion remains in the lower energy state, or 0.

If there is no change in the aluminum ion, then another laser pulse causes both ions to begin rocking side to side in unison because of their physical proximity and the interaction of their electrical charges. An additional laser pulse converts this motion into a change in the internal energy level of the beryllium ion. This pulse reverses the direction of the ion’s magnetic “spin,” and the beryllium goes dark, a signal that the aluminum remained in the 0 state.

On the other hand, if the aluminum ion jumps to the higher energy level, then the additional laser pulses fail to stimulate a shared rocking motion and have no effect on the beryllium ion, which keeps emitting light. Scientists detect this light as a signal that the aluminum ion jumped from 0 to 1.

The goal is to tune the clock laser to the exact frequency that prompts the aluminum to jump from 0 to 1. The actual measurement of the ticking of the clock is provided not by the ions but rather by the clock laser’s precisely tuned center frequency, which is measured with a “frequency comb,” a tool for measuring very high optical frequencies, or colors of light.

Explore further: Physicists provide new insights into the world of quantum materials

More information: C.-W. Chou, D.B. Hume, J.C.J. Koelemeij, D.J. Wineland, and T. Rosenband. 2010. Frequency Comparison of Two High-Accuracy Al+ Optical Clocks. Physical Review Letters. Forthcoming. A preprint is available at arxiv.org/abs/0911.4527

Related Stories

A Quantum Mechanical 'Tune Up' for Better Measurement

Jun 05, 2004

By exploiting the weird quantum behavior of atoms, physicists at the Commerce Department’s National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) have demonstrated a new technique that someday could be used to save weeks ...

Optical Atomic Clock: A long look at the captured atoms

Feb 05, 2008

Optical clocks might become the atomic clocks of the future. Their "pendulum", i.e. the regular oscillation process which each clock needs, is an oscillation in the range of the visible light. As its frequency is higher than ...

Portable Precision: A New Type of Atomic Clock

Jun 11, 2009

The most accurate atomic clocks in the world are based on the output of cesium atoms. These ultra-precise fountain clocks measure the frequency and time interval of seconds by using a fountain-like movement of cesium atoms. ...

Portable Precision: A New Type of Atomic Clock

Dec 10, 2008

(PhysOrg.com) -- The most accurate atomic clocks in the world are based on the output of cesium atoms. These ultra-precise fountain clocks measure the frequency and time interval of seconds by using a fountain-like movement ...

New Research Promises Better Atomic Clocks

Apr 22, 2009

(PhysOrg.com) -- The most accurate timekeepers in the world are atomic clocks, which tell time based on the absorption of a very specific and unchanging microwave frequency, which induces electrons in an atom to “jump” ...

Recommended for you

How Paramecium protozoa claw their way to the top

Sep 19, 2014

The ability to swim upwards – towards the sun and food supplies – is vital for many aquatic microorganisms. Exactly how they are able to differentiate between above and below in often murky waters is ...

User comments : 10

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

jimbo92107
not rated yet Feb 04, 2010
Thanks, that reminded me to set my watch.
It was off by a couple minutes...
SmartK8
1 / 5 (1) Feb 04, 2010
Mine was off by few femto-seconds, but still. This article reminded me, that it'd be interesting to see what effect has time dilation on a super-positioned element.
nuge
Feb 04, 2010
This comment has been removed by a moderator.
broglia
not rated yet Feb 05, 2010
The idea, whole human civilization maintains it's time by wobbling of single atom somewhere in test tube sounds crazy for me. I wonder, if aluminium atom used will be placed into case of National Watch & Clock Museum at its very end...?
Kedas
not rated yet Feb 05, 2010
"The new aluminum clock would neither gain nor lose one second in about 3.7 billion years"

Any idea how they know that??
If I want to know how much my clock is wrong over time I compare it to a reference clock, but in this case, it is the reference clock?
ThomasS
not rated yet Feb 05, 2010
Will it be easier or more difficult to build than the caesium standards? Anyone?
baudrunner
not rated yet Feb 05, 2010
"The new aluminum clock would neither gain nor lose one second in about 3.7 billion years, according to measurements to be reported in Physical Review Letters."

Actually, that's completely false. Time, by very definition of its function as a frame of reference, is necessarily independent of the 'winding down' of the Universe, a fact which has been supported by evidence of actual shrinkage of the hydrogen atom over the history of the observable Universe. Over the course of 3.7 billion years, shrinkage of the aluminum ion will actually result in a change of frequency, which results in a change of rate of time lapse.
SteveL
not rated yet Feb 05, 2010
So, it might be off 1.5 seconds in 3.7 billion years? Oh my, whatever will we do?

Of course, whatever standard is chosen will need to be moved to Mars or further out, to keep from being swallowed by the sun when it starts to swell as it dies.
Sci_Fi_Si
not rated yet Feb 05, 2010
Whatever would John Harrison have say to this? The mind boggles...
nuge
not rated yet Feb 07, 2010
Whatever would John Harrison have say to this? The mind boggles...


I had said something like that, but Physorg decided to delete my comment.
antialias
not rated yet Feb 08, 2010
It seems a lot of people don't understand why having precise clocks is important. You only have to go as far as your navigation system in your car: The more accurately you can measure time differentials of incoming signals (in this case from GPS sattelites) the less your positioning error will be.

Also, the more precise time signals you have the more precise you can tune frequencies. With a doubling in the precision of timekeeping you can double the amount of information you can transmit via frequency encoding (and everyone who has suffered low-bandwith should understand that this alone is a _huge_ thing.)

Not to mention all the applications in astronomy (like finding and characterising extrasolar planets by their spectra which requires exceedingly fine tuned frequency detection capabilities)