Trees retaliate when their fig wasps don't service them

Jan 27, 2010

Figs and fig wasps have evolved to help each other out: Fig wasps lay their eggs inside the fruit where the wasp larvae can safely develop, and in return, the wasps pollinate the figs.

But what happens when a wasp lays its eggs but fails to pollinate the fig?

The get even by dropping those figs to the ground, killing the baby wasps inside, reports a Cornell University and Smithsonian Tropical Research Institute study published in the (published online Jan. 13).

The findings suggest that when one species in a mutually beneficial relationship fails to hold up its end of the bargain, sanctions may be a necessary part of maintaining the relationship.

"We want to know what forces maintain this 80 million-year-old mutualism between figs and their wasp pollinators," said lead author Charlotte Jandér, a Cornell graduate student in neurobiology and behavior, who conducted the study as a Smithsonian Tropical Research Institute predoctoral fellow. Edward Allen Herre, a staff scientist at the Smithsonian institute in Panama, co-authored the paper.

"What prevents the wasps from cheating and reaping the benefits of the relationship without paying the costs?" Jandér added.

More than 700 species each of fig trees and wasps have co-evolved in the tropics worldwide, with each fig tree species having its own species of pollinating wasp. Jandér worked on six fig tree-fig wasp pairs for the study. Some wasp species passively carry pollen that sticks to their bodies, while others actively collect pollen in special pouches.

The researchers found that in passively pollinated pairings, the tree almost never aborted its fruit, and the wasp always carried pollen. However, the researchers found that in actively pollinated pairings, where the wasp needs to expend energy to collect pollen, the tree dumped the fruit and killed the offspring when the wasps did not carry pollen.

The researchers also found that among the actively pollinated fig species, pollen-free were much more common when the trees had weak sanctions.

"Sanctions seem to be a necessary force in keeping this and other mutually beneficial relationships on track when being part of a mutualism is costly," said Jandér. "In our study, we saw less cheating when sanctions were stronger. Similar results have been found among human societies and social insects. It is very appealing to think that the same general principles could help maintain cooperation both within and among species."

Explore further: Philippine tarsier gets boost from Kansas research, and genetic proof of a new variety

Related Stories

Punishment important in plant-pollinator relationship

Jan 14, 2010

Figs and the wasps that pollinate them present one of biologists' favorite examples of a beneficial relationship between two different species. In exchange for the pollination service provided by the wasp, ...

Well-traveled wasps provide hope for vanishing species

Nov 09, 2009

They may only be 1.5mm in size, but the tiny wasps that pollinate fig trees can travel over 160km in less than 48 hours, according to research from scientists at the University of Leeds. The fig wasps are transporting ...

Tree-destroying wasp spreads in Hawaii

Oct 10, 2006

A non-native species of wasp that threatens the wiliwili trees found only in Hawaii has spread to Maui's remote south coast, a report said.

Recommended for you

How to tell what a donkey is thinking

18 hours ago

Yawning, sighing and stretching are just three behaviours observed in donkeys that have been evaluated in newly published research led by academics from the University of Bristol's School of Veterinary Sciences ...

User comments : 6

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

Parsec
not rated yet Jan 27, 2010
Sanctions involving executions of the offenders offspring seem a tad harsh. In addition, eradicating the offspring of a bad apple may keep bad apples from propagating into the next generation (DOH!), but a generational time delay in behavior correction might be a little long in improving cooperation.

Beside which, even the Republicans wouldn't (most of them anyway) spring for this sort of punishment scheme. Unless it only applied to illegal immigrants of course.
Doug_Huffman
not rated yet Jan 27, 2010
In as much as your 'republicans' would not execute so harsh a punishment scheme, a good conservative would.
tkjtkj
5 / 5 (1) Jan 27, 2010
Sanctions involving executions of the offenders offspring seem a tad harsh. In addition, eradicating the offspring of a bad apple may keep bad apples from propagating into the next generation (DOH!), but a generational time delay in behavior correction might be a little long in improving cooperation.

Beside which, even the Republicans wouldn't (most of them anyway) spring for this sort of punishment scheme. Unless it only applied to illegal immigrants of course.


funny yes, and thanks .. but remember: 'Mother Nature is a harsh taskmaster!!'

MadPutz
not rated yet Jan 28, 2010
Trees = Republicans
Wasps = Democrats

Question is, which one is more parasitic in its selfishness.
RHaston
not rated yet Jan 28, 2010
Speaking of genetics and politics:

www.politicalspecies.com
breadhead
not rated yet Jan 31, 2010
Do you readers actually just accept without question the writing about millions of years this, or billions of years that? So, since so-called scientists can't explain how a process came into existance, we will just give it more time? Every such process has an origin, more time doesn't explain or solve it. The presupposition by many of these people is that Darwin is the messiah, and evolution (Change over time) is their god. Stick to the subject of the actual research. If you have discovered a behavior with wasps and whatever, tell us the science (Those experiments which are reproducable, & able to be witnessed), and leave out the religion.