Defending Planet Earth from Asteroid and Comet Strikes (w/ Video)

Jan 25, 2010

University of Maryland Astronomy Professor Michael A'Hearn, leader of NASA's Deep Impact and EPOXI comet missions is vice-chair of a new report from the National Academy of Sciences on detecting and protecting Earth from collisions with comets and asteroids. In the report, "Defending Planet Earth: Near-Earth Object Surveys and Hazard Mitigation Strategies," the panel says NASA cannot meet a Congressional requirement to find 90 percent of Earth-threatening asteroids 155 yards in diameter or larger, unless money is appropriated for the task.

The report committee calls on NASA to monitor for even smaller sized space rocks (down to 100 ft), because these also could pose significant hazards. In addition to serving on the full committee, A'Hearn also headed a subpanel that looked at how to deflect or otherwise avoid or "mitigate" damage from an asteroid, comet or smaller on a collision course with Earth.

This video is not supported by your browser at this time.
Professor A'Hearn talks on YouTube about possible danger from asteroids and other objects in space.

Q: How big a threat is there from objects striking our planet?

A'Hearn: We need to keep in mind that really small [impact] events happen all the time, including the meteorite that landed in a doctor's office this week in the Washington suburbs. Big events like Tunguska in 1908, an event that could easily wipe out a whole city or a 50 mile area, those probably happen once every few hundred years. So in any human lifetime, there is perhaps a 20 - 30 percent chance that one of these events will happen.

Global devastations, because they would wipe out humanity, we really need to worry about them, but they really are very infrequent. [The report notes that research has clearly demonstrated that major impact events caused by large asteroids or comets have occurred throughout Earth's 4.5 billion year history, often with catastrophic consequences. It was just such an event 65 million years ago, caused by an estimated 10 kilometer or asteroid striking the Yucatan peninsula, that probably wiped out the dinosaurs.]

Q: What prompted this new report from the National Research Council, the operating arm of the ?

A'Hearn: In the 1980s we first started surveying these objects to try and catch them before they hit the Earth. In 1998, congress gave NASA [a year of funding] specifically to conduct searches. NASA started the searches and has kept them up. That's been called the Space Guard survey and has had a goal of finding all the objects larger than 1 kilometer. We think we've found roughly 90 percent of those objects and none of the objects that we've found are going to hit the Earth in this century.

In 2005 congress directed NASA to initiate the George E. Brown survey for objects down to 140 meters [about 460 feet]. One hundred and forty meters is still a pretty large object that would easily wipe out any large city and much more. No money ever came [to NASA] to start the survey. In 2008 Congress mandated that NASA fund a study by the National Research Council to recommend a way forward [with the Brown survey].

The report was required to not only address finding the objects, but also once you find them how you mitigate against a collision, typically by diverting the object so it misses the Earth.

Q: Can you tell us more about what the committee says about how to respond to such threats?

A'Hearn: There are four general approaches. We don't talk about specific missions, we talk about general approaches. For a small [object], you might just evacuate the area where it is going to hit. For a somewhat larger [object] -- not much larger, but with decades of warning -- you apply a very small push for a few decades. This is most easily done with what is called a gravity tractor - just applying the gravity of a large mass near the object to change its course. For larger objects or less warning you do what we call a kinetic impact. You slam into the object with a large mass, like Deep Impact, but on a much larger scale. For the largest objects and the shortest warnings the only option remaining is a nuclear device.

Q: What does the committee say are the next steps in "Defending planet Earth"?

A'Hearn: Clearly what we think is needed is an enhanced program that has a couple of aspects:
One is really conducting the survey for 140 meter objects that Congress mandated [but has not funded]. We have recommendations that you can do it [search for the objects] from either the ground or from space, depending on which is more important speed or cost. It's cheaper on the ground, but it takes longer. It is no longer physically possible to do the survey in the time [by 2020] originally planned by Congress. It's also clear that in cannot be done without a substantial increase in funding.

Other steps that are urgent are some fundamental research into things such as: how airbursts [a meteoroid exploding in the air] of objects in the 50 to 100 meter size range, work; and exactly what size object does have a big effect on the ground. We don't actually know that very well. Research on how you mitigate against these objects is also important. Deep Impact proved you could target and hit comets or other objects in space. However, it had a different purpose and was be too small in scale to provide deflection.

was a proof of concept -- that you could target and hit comets or other objects in space -- but it was done at far too small a scale to be useful at mitigation. You need to improve targeting, and figure out how to get a much bigger mass out there. Some peer reviewed research needs to be done on how nuclear weapons can be used. There has been some classified work, but we aren't allowed to know about that as part of our report.

We even need to think very carefully about the response framework, who's in charge [of responding], that's not defined. Congress said OSTP [White House Office of Science and Technology Policy] should make a recommendation on who's in charge, that hasn't been done yet. We think that OSTP is waiting for our report.

Explore further: Computer model shows moon's core surrounded by liquid and it's caused by Earth's gravity

More information: Report: www8.nationalacademies.org/onp… .aspx?RecordID=12842

add to favorites email to friend print save as pdf

Related Stories

Congressional Hearing on Asteroid Threat

Nov 07, 2007

UC Davis physics professor J. Anthony Tyson will testify before Congress on Thursday, Nov. 8, on near-Earth asteroids. Tyson will talk about the potential role of the proposed Large Synoptic Survey Telescope (LSST) in surveying ...

NASA to Provide Web Updates on Objects Approaching Earth

Jul 30, 2009

NASA's Jet Propulsion Laboratory is introducing a new Web site that will provide a centralized resource for information on near-Earth objects - those asteroids and comets that can approach Earth. The "Asteroid ...

Probing Question: Are Asteroids a Threat to Earth?

Nov 12, 2007

Hollywood thrillers such as Deep Impact helped to jump-start America's interest in knowing what our "deflection strategy" would be if a giant asteroid was on a potentially catastrophic collision course with ...

NASA Statement on Student Asteroid Calculations

Apr 17, 2008

The Near-Earth Object Program Office at NASA's Jet Propulsion Laboratory in Pasadena, Calif., has not changed its current estimates for the very low probability (1 in 45,000) of an Earth impact by the asteroid ...

Asteroid to Make Rare Close Flyby of Earth

Jan 24, 2008

Scientists are monitoring the orbit of asteroid 2007 TU24. The asteroid, believed to be between 150 meters (500 feet) and 610 meters (2,000 feet) in size, is expected to fly past Earth on Jan. 29, with its ...

Recommended for you

Image: NASA's SDO observes a lunar transit

3 hours ago

On July 26, 2014, from 10:57 a.m. to 11:42 a.m. EDT, the moon crossed between NASA's Solar Dynamics Observatory and the sun, a phenomenon called a lunar transit.

Image: Tethys in sunlight

3 hours ago

Tethys, like many moons in the solar system, keeps one face pointed towards the planet around which it orbits. Tethys' anti-Saturn face is seen here, fully illuminated, basking in sunlight. On the right side ...

User comments : 1

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

bugmenot23
not rated yet Jan 26, 2010
"It was just such an event 65 million years ago, caused by an estimated 10 kilometer comet or asteroid striking the Yucatan peninsula, that probably wiped out the dinosaurs."

The "probably" is misplaced. The dinosaurs were definitely wiped out--there is no "probably" about it. The "probably" should go in the phrase "It was probably just such an event..."