As Rainier's glaciers recede, debris chokes rivers

Jan 07, 2010 By Sandi Doughton

The fallout from Mount Rainier's shrinking glaciers is beginning to roll downhill, and nowhere is the impact more striking than on the volcano's west side.

"This is it in spades," said Park Service geologist Paul Kennard, scrambling up a 10-foot-tall mass of dirt and boulders bulldozed back just enough to clear the road.

As receding expose crumbly slopes, vast amounts of gravel and sediment are being sluiced into the rivers that flow from the Northwest's tallest peak. Much of the material sweeps down in rain-driven slurries called debris flows.

"The rivers are filling up with stuff," Kennard said from his vantage point atop the pile. He pointed out ancient stands of fir and cedar now up to their knees in water.

Inside park boundaries, rivers choked with gravel are threatening to spill across roads, bump up against the bottom of bridges and the historic complex at Longmire. Downstream, communities in King and Pierce counties are casting a wary eye at the volcano in their backyard. There are already signs that riverbeds near Auburn and Puyallup are rising. As glaciers continue to pull back, the result could be increased flood danger across the Puget Sound lowlands for decades.

"There is significant evidence that things are changing dramatically at Mount Rainier," said Tim Abbe, of the environmental consulting firm ENTRIX. "We need to start planning for it now," added Abbe, who helps analyze Mount Rainier's river systems.

Similar dynamics are playing out at all the region's major glaciated peaks, from Mount Jefferson to Mount Baker, said research hydrologist Gordon Grant, of the U.S. Forest Service Pacific Northwest Research Station in Corvallis, Ore.

Climate experts blame global warming, triggered by emissions from industries and cars, for much of the ongoing retreat of glaciers worldwide.

North Cascades National Park has lost half of its ice area in the past century. Mount Rainier's glaciers have shrunk by more than a quarter. "Every year it's been either bad or really bad," Kennard said. "This year it was really, really bad."

Glaciers buttress immense moraines and stabilize steep slopes. As they pull back, the vulnerable terrain is exposed to weather and tugged by gravity. All recent debris flows on Mount Rainier have occurred in recently deglaciated areas, Grant said.

"The whole mountain is covered with unstable debris, it's steep -- and then you put a lot of water on it," he said.

Most debris flows are triggered by heavy rain. Climate scientists disagree on whether the entire Northwest is being hit by significantly stronger storms than in the past, but there's no doubt that's the case at Mount Rainier, Kennard said.

Precipitation records show more intense rainfall. According to stream-flow data, what was once a 100-year flood on the Nisqually River now occurs every 14 years. In 2006, a November storm dumped 18 inches of rain on the park in 36 hours, sweeping away a campground and closing the park for more than six months.

"Even without climate change, you've got to say: 'Whoa, something is going on here,' " Abbe said.

Debris flows can carry boulders the size of buses and sweep staggering amounts of gravel and sediment into rivers. The bed of the Nisqually River below its namesake glacier has risen by 38 feet since 1910, largely as a result of debris flows from the margins of the rapidly retreating ice, Kennard said.

The park visitor center at Longmire, with its stone buildings and National Park Inn, now sits more than 30 feet below the Nisqually River. The park constructed concrete-reinforced berms to keep the water at bay.

Every river bed in the park is rising, or aggrading, because of the influx of gravel, Kennard said. The rate of buildup has increased nearly tenfold over the past decade.

The result is a constant and costly battle to keep popular recreation areas throughout the park open. It's a battle that's being lost in many places, like the Westside and Carbon River roads, which are partially closed.

Like conveyor belts, the rivers move the gravel downstream toward more heavily populated areas. A surprise flood that hit the city of Pacific in January 2009 can at least partly be blamed on volume reduction in the White River caused by accumulation of sediment, U.S. Geological Survey hydrologist Chris Magirl said.

Magirl, who has examined aggradation rates and historical records for downstream river stretches, sees similar buildup in several locations. But channels appear to be deepening in other places, including portions of the Puyallup and Cowlitz rivers. That type of variation is expected in such a complex system, Magirl said. But the long-term outlook for the rivers is not good.

"The potential for glacial retreat to add new sediment is historically unprecedented," he said. "Clearly, water and rock are going to flow downhill."

Glacial retreat may be aggravating the flow of sediment, but the basic process is as old as the volcano itself. Past eruptions have unleashed mud flows that smothered surrounding valleys and reached all the way to Puget Sound.

From the 1930s through the 1980s, Pierce County dredged gravel from the Puyallup River system almost every year to reduce the risk of floods, said Lorin Reinelt, program manager for the county's flood-management plan.

Most dredging ended by the early 1990s, as concern for fish habitat took precedence. Officials also realized that digging out gravel provides only a brief fix, at best, Reinelt said. "In many cases it just fills back up during the next event."

Communities now are trying to figure out what rising levels of gravel and sediment from Mount Rainier will mean for future flood risks -- and what they can do about it.

Short of relocating Longmire, dredging is the only obvious way to keep the river from swallowing the park complex, Kennard said. Downstream, Reinelt said, a more effective approach might be to move levees back to give the rivers more room to spill their banks, meander and deposit gravel without impacting homes or businesses.

"This is a pretty significant issue," he said. "It seems like we're on a trajectory that's not likely to reverse any time soon."

Explore further: Canada to push Arctic claim in Europe

3.9 /5 (8 votes)
add to favorites email to friend print save as pdf

Related Stories

Glaciers feeding Ganges may melt down

Jul 01, 2005

Indian scientists say carbon dioxide and other emissions will cause the melt down of glaciers feeding the Ganges River before the century's end.

Living, Meandering River Constructed

Sep 29, 2009

(PhysOrg.com) -- In a feat of reverse-engineering, Christian Braudrick of University of California at Berkeley and three coauthors have successfully built and maintained a scale model of a living meandering ...

Norwegian glaciers could melt completely

Apr 07, 2006

Climate researchers predict that the approximately 1,600 Norwegian glaciers could melt completely away in course of the next 100 years. This would mean that only 28 glaciers would remain in the country.

Recommended for you

Canada to push Arctic claim in Europe

2 hours ago

Canada's top diplomat will discuss the Arctic with his Scandinavian counterparts in Denmark and Norway next week, it was announced Thursday, a trip that will raise suspicions in Russia.

Severe drought is causing the western US to rise

8 hours ago

The severe drought gripping the western United States in recent years is changing the landscape well beyond localized effects of water restrictions and browning lawns. Scientists at Scripps Institution of ...

A NASA satellite double-take at Hurricane Lowell

8 hours ago

Lowell is now a large hurricane in the Eastern Pacific and NASA's Aqua and Terra satellites double-teamed it to provide infrared and radar data to scientists. Lowell strengthened into a hurricane during the ...

User comments : 6

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

Parsec
1 / 5 (5) Jan 07, 2010
Global Warming is a hoax foisted on the unsuspecting sheep of the world by evil scientists bent on world domination and forcing everyone to eat bug parts instead of real food!

So obviously this report is completely made up from whole cloth and is part of the conspiracy, just like all those thousands and thousands of reports supporting global warming from all over the world.

I know this is so because my buddies at Fox News said it was so and George Will is a genius and also I read it on the internet and everyone knows that they never lie or make stuff up.

So ignore the data and burn this report!
Nik_2213
not rated yet Jan 08, 2010
I'm sorry, Parsec, I cannot decide if you're joking or not...

Of course, what would settle GW issue is for Greenland & West Antarctic to slough their icecaps wholesale, the US EastCoast clathrates to burp & burn, and the NW Passage to become an annual yachty race...
deatopmg
2.3 / 5 (6) Jan 08, 2010
I'm sorry, Parsec, I cannot decide if you're joking or not...

Of course, what would settle GW issue is for Greenland & West Antarctic to slough their icecaps wholesale, the US EastCoast clathrates to burp & burn, and the NW Passage to become an annual yachty race...


@Nik 2213: Do you mean like Amundsen sailing thru the ice free NW passage in 1903? http://www.thecan...A0005816
Nik_2213
3.7 / 5 (3) Jan 08, 2010
http://en.wikiped...Amundsen

"... After a third winter trapped in the ice, Amundsen was able to navigate a passage into the Beaufort Sea after which he cleared into the Bering Strait, thus having successfully navigated the Northwest Passage."

It was not ice-free, and he did not get through non-stop.
GrayMouser
2.1 / 5 (7) Jan 08, 2010
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Roald_Amundsen

"... After a third winter trapped in the ice, Amundsen was able to navigate a passage into the Beaufort Sea after which he cleared into the Bering Strait, thus having successfully navigated the Northwest Passage."

It was not ice-free, and he did not get through non-stop.

But during the 1935-1945 warming shipping was regularly going within 15 degrees of the North Pole during the summer.
Benier_Duster
Jan 21, 2010
This comment has been removed by a moderator.
Velanarris
1 / 5 (4) Jan 21, 2010
Question would be, how much of this is related to the glacier and how much of this is related to the precipitation driven flooding that occured in 2006.