AT&T wants out of landline business

Dec 31, 2009
The AT&T Communications Inc. corporate headquarters building in San Antonio, Texas. US telecom giant AT&T has asked US regulatory authorities to waive a requirement that it and other carriers maintain costly landline networks.

US telecom giant AT&T has asked US regulatory authorities to waive a requirement that it and other carriers maintain costly landline networks.

AT&T, the oldest US telephone company, made the request in a filing last week with the in which it also asked the FCC to set a "firm deadline" for phasing out wireline service.

"The business model for legacy phone services is in a death spiral," AT&T said. "With an outdated product, falling revenues, and rising costs, the plain-old telephone service (POTS) business is unsustainable for the long run."

The AT&T filing was in response to an FCC request earlier this month for input on plans to extend high-speed Internet broadband to the entire country.

It was published online by technology blog GigaOM.

AT&T said the high costs of maintaining the legacy phone network were "diverting valuable resources, both public and private, that could be used to expand broadband access and to improve the quality of broadband service."

The company said it was being forced to "dedicate substantial resources to an antiquated network and outdated service."

AT&T said that with the rise of cellphones and Internet communications such as VoIP less than 20 percent of Americans now rely exclusively on landlines for voice service and 25 percent have abandoned them altogether.

It said 700,000 lines are being cut every month.

Explore further: TV-over-Internet service Aereo seeks Chapter 11 (Update)

add to favorites email to friend print save as pdf

Related Stories

FCC offers early peak at national broadband plan

Dec 16, 2009

(AP) -- Expanding the fund that subsidizes telephone service for poor and rural communities and finding more spectrum for wireless broadband services will be key pieces of a federal plan to bring high-speed Internet connections ...

FCC gets going on national broadband plan

Apr 08, 2009

(AP) -- The Federal Communications Commission took the first step Wednesday in developing a comprehensive plan to give all Americans high-speed Internet access.

Nokia launches new solution bringing VoIP to broadband networks

Sep 21, 2004

Today at the Broadband World Forum in Venice, Italy, Nokia has launched a new solution for broadband operators, which will enable VoIP services to be combined with broadband. The Nokia Voice solution brings POTS (Plain Old Telephone Service) compatibility to the Nokia ...

Recommended for you

Form Devices team designs Point as a house sitter

Nov 22, 2014

A Scandinavian team "with an international outlook" and good eye for electronics, software and design aims to reach success with what they characterize as "a softer take" on home security. Their device is ...

Man pleads guilty in New York cybercrime case

Nov 22, 2014

A California man has pleaded guilty in New York City for his role marketing malware that federal authorities say infected more than a half-million computers worldwide.

Dish restores Turner channels to lineup

Nov 21, 2014

Turner Broadcasting channels such as Cartoon Network and CNN are back on the Dish network after being dropped from the satellite TV provider's lineup during contract talks.

User comments : 20

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

LKD
4 / 5 (4) Dec 31, 2009
I really hope that the powers that be allow this and we slowly begin the transition from copper to fibre and cells through the whole country. The technology is there to get everyone reliably onto wireless services in the US.
TheQuietMan
4 / 5 (4) Dec 31, 2009
That sounds very good on the surface, but how about rural america, where landlines are the only option? Given they already have one of the most profitable business in history in a business that is known for gotchas and tricking the consumer, this is just one more example of their lack of responsibility for consumers.

When I got my FIOS I had to pay for the hardware, all of it.
Neurons_At_Work
4.3 / 5 (6) Dec 31, 2009
Once again, I have to ask: what happens during a major power outage? Whether caused by terrorist attack, solar flare, natural disaster, or whatever, all of the communications infrastructure that depends on conventional power sources will be disabled. Only POTS services still use battery backup, which is the only reason I still have a land line. Remember New Orleans, and the other major blackouts in recent history. Cell towers, fiber optic repeaters for cable or DSL--none of those will function without AC power. So, unless there is a plan to handle emergency communications for every household during a major power outage, this is a really bad idea, IMHO...
DocM
4 / 5 (3) Dec 31, 2009
Power outage? How about what would happen in case of a coronal mass ejection that knocks out satellites? At least with wired service local connections might stay up.

Time to drag out the old HAM rig, just in case :-P
TheQuietMan
4 / 5 (2) Dec 31, 2009
For what it's worth, FIOS has a 6 hour battery backup.

I tend to agree about the redundancy factor though.
plasticpower
4.6 / 5 (5) Dec 31, 2009
In an event of a power outage, cell phone sites are required to have generators. Ever wonder why your cell phone works even when your power is out? Just buy a car charger.
CarolinaScotsman
5 / 5 (3) Dec 31, 2009
I suspect that within the century (maybe far sooner) that wireless will be the only option for phones. "Cable" comapanies, if they are still around, will be wireless and point of use power generation will be a reality. In other words, all utility lines will be gone.
brant
3 / 5 (3) Dec 31, 2009
Yeah. Get rid of internet! Dont fall for it. Who is going to maintain the networks? It will be pay as you go.

We need landlines. Then they dont have total control.
Neurons_At_Work
3.3 / 5 (4) Dec 31, 2009
In an event of a power outage, cell phone sites are required to have generators. Ever wonder why your cell phone works even when your power is out? Just buy a car charger.

My investigations say otherwise. A rule by the FCC requiring cell towers to have 8 hours of backup power was overturned by the White House 13 months ago, citing legal challenges by Sprint and others to the rule, first proposed in May of '07. Since then, to the best of my knowledge, no other regulations of this sort have been put in place. Apparently, Hurricane Katrina wasn't a big enough motivator...
Roj
3 / 5 (2) Jan 01, 2010
Its the sound of big-corporate cry babies. Private-enterprise hegemony cries, because it works.

1) AT&T already adapted U-Verse broadband/TV to its copper infrastructure. Copper is not the issue.

2) POTS can be software emulated over fiber, especially less 0.7 million lines per month. Keeping POTS as a backup STD is not the issue.

3) AT&T's "Universal Life Line" services would have surged with the poverty stricken, State mandated $6.00 POTS, right after the global sub-prime foreclosures converted the worlds assets & retirement accounts.

4) AT&T got stuck with sloppy seconds; broke "Life-Line" refugees, already exploited by banks, and a hard up-sell to AT&T's new broadband U-Verse.

5) POTS and it's "Life-Line" refugees are a lemon, which must be squeezed harder to get the last few drops of juice.
weewilly
2.3 / 5 (3) Jan 01, 2010
Privacy will be sacrificed. Here is a scenario. Your doctor is consulting with another doctor about your health issues that will be picked up by someone paid to listen in and report it to the insurance companies. It is already being done and once messages go out on the air waves they are anybody's to intercept. Like having your doctor talk about you on national TV. What about our Defense Department and Governmental issues. They should have to come up with a plan for that first.
VOR
3 / 5 (2) Jan 01, 2010
This is a TERRIBLE idea. For the above reasons and more. I know I'm not the only person that keeps land lines because it SOUNDS BETTER and is reliable. I HATE dropouts, cutoffs, and crappy, companded sound of cell phones. So called progress is a joke. Wireless is sometimes worse than wired. But we are complacent to that fact. Cellular is a POOR SUBSTITUTE for land lines and part of the problem is many cheap Americans decided to forgoe quality. Yes I think we all should have both. I use a cheap prepaid cellular plan and only talk on it briefly until I get home, not just to keep my minutes down, but becuase talking on them SUCKS.
Keep landlines forever. Do your part and get land line service! "antiquated network and outdated service"- what a f'in joke- Azzholes!
antialias_physorg
not rated yet Jan 02, 2010
Your doctor is consulting with another doctor about your health issues that will be picked up by someone paid to listen in and report it to the insurance companies.


Have you ever heard of encryption? Whenever you convey sensitive information it is always prudent to encrypt it. (and it's not hard to do that - no matter what the type of communication you utilize)
Cynikal
5 / 5 (1) Jan 02, 2010
To understand why ATT wants out of the POTS system you need to know a bit of telcom history.

Back in the 70s, when Ma Bell ruled the telephone network in the US (see: monopoly), they owned everything related to a telephone - including renting you a phone to use in your house. Now when the government decided to break up the monopoly, they created two classes of providers: ILECs (incumbent local exchange carrier) and CLECs (competitive LEC). Now ILECs were created by splitting up ATT into 7 smaller phone companies, but still allowed these "baby Bell" companies to maintain the copper POTS system. Now in a nutshell the Act that spilt up ATT forces the ILECs to lease the copper lines running to your house to any mom and pop telecom provider at cost - they can't charge a penny more then what they themselves pay. But this only pertains to copper running to the customer's house, which is why some ILECs (Verizon) are moving to fiber to circumvent the whole issue.
fingersinterlaced
5 / 5 (1) Jan 02, 2010
Privacy will be sacrificed. Here is a scenario. Your doctor is consulting with another doctor about your health issues that will be picked up by someone paid to listen in and report it to the insurance companies. It is already being done and once messages go out on the air waves they are anybody's to intercept. Like having your doctor talk about you on national TV. What about our Defense Department and Governmental issues. They should have to come up with a plan for that first.


Bahhahhhahhahahhha! Are you serious? Here ya go mate, make yourself one of these http://www.stopabductions.com/

Sorry, had to.
Shootist
Jan 02, 2010
This comment has been removed by a moderator.
david_42
4 / 5 (1) Jan 02, 2010
IF they extend the wireless/cell/cable service to all houses, then no problem. I live in a deep valley, a long way from the main road. No cell, no wireless, no cable, no AM, no FM, no broadcast TV. Reliability? I lose power and my landline 5-10 times a year. Copper breaks.
RJ32
not rated yet Jan 03, 2010
My land line is my emergency back-up. When the power fails, it is my only connection with the rest of the world. I can do without a lot of other things, but if I have no communication system, what do I do in a medical emergency? If AT&T wants to abandon copper, they should be required to provide an alternative that is as reliable as the old battery backed-up system that has served so well for many years.
Arikin
not rated yet Jan 04, 2010
Like Cynikal said, unless AT&T gets to make a profit off of landlines they will not keep them unless forced to.

It is about time to change the POTS backbone. That is why they use it as an excuse.

But would AT&T be willing to replace it all with fiber-optic lines if they were allowed to make profit from it? We are talking about a huge investment here...
airpipe
1 / 5 (2) Jan 05, 2010

the only reason the phone system is antiquated is because the phone company's have let it get that way. They quit spending money on the networks years ago to make bigger profits, just look how much at&t made last year in a bad economy
LKD
5 / 5 (1) Jan 06, 2010
Airpipe, you obviously don't understand finances if you think profits actually translates directly to huge cash bins like Scrooge McDuck and his vault of cash. Most (all well run) businesses post a loss or break even after expenses each year. A very few hold money in reserve in order to finance future projects, like Microsoft did.

You will note that all those billion dollar figures in the news are pre-expences! Meaning that figure is how much money they received that year and is not accounting for employees pay, vendors products, electricity, gas, rent, taxes, etc... Which eats up about all that money.

Landlines are very reliable, but outdated. If they recycled the copper in the wiring, I bet that would cover half the cost of replacing it with a cell system and fibrecable.

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more

Click here to reset your password.
Sign in to get notified via email when new comments are made.