UN climate official warns of Indian energy 'crisis'

Dec 23, 2009

India's reliance on coal means the country is heading for an energy crisis unless it diversifies its sources of power, the chairman of the UN's top climate change panel predicted on Wednesday.

Rajendra Pachauri, chairman of the Nobel-winning Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), said India had to curb its high-polluting coal consumption in the near future or risk burning through its reserves.

"There's going to be a major constraint in supply of coal and if we don't bring about a shift to a more sustainable pattern of energy consumption and supply India is going to face a major crisis," he told reporters in New Delhi.

He added that India was projected to import 750 million tonnes of oil and 1.4 billion tonnes of coal a year by 2031 and 2032.

"We have already become major coal importers and it is a myth to believe that India has unlimited mineable quantities of coal and that we can use as much as we want," Indian-born Pachauri said.

According to the International Energy Agency, more than half of the world's energy demands by 2030 will come from India and its fellow emerging economic powerhouse China.

Already among the world's top 10 oil importers, India is expected to become the world's fourth-largest by 2025, according to US government data.

The Ministry of Coal projected India's coal imports for 2008-2009 to be around 58 million tonnes.

currently provides just under 55 percent of the country's massive electricity needs, resulting in a huge on account of the country's 1.2 billion population.

Pachauri urged India to improve and make "a very rapid move" to use more renewable sources of .

Explore further: Dam hard: Water storage is a historic headache for Australia

add to favorites email to friend print save as pdf

Related Stories

European power plants boosting coal use

Apr 24, 2008

High oil and natural gas prices, coupled with increased demand, are driving Europe's return to coal-fired power plants, an industry official says.

Global emissions to leap 39 percent by 2030: US

May 27, 2009

Global carbon dioxide emissions are set to rise 39 percent by 2030 as energy consumption surges in the developing world, notably in Asian giants China and India, the United States warned on Wednesday.

China joins U.S. FutureGen project

Dec 16, 2006

China has joined the United States in the FutureGen International Partnership, a plan to develop clean-burning coal, the U.S. Department of Energy said Friday.

US coal peak production: Point and counterpoint

Oct 20, 2009

A timely debate on "United States Coal Peak Production" will enliven the annual meeting of the Geological Society of America in Portland, Oregon, today. Highly regarded experts David B. Rutledge of the California Institute ...

Recommended for you

Does it help conservation to put a price on nature?

1 hour ago

Putting a price on the services which a particular ecosystem provides may encourage the adoption of greener policies, but it may come at the price of biodiversity conservation. Writing today in the journal ...

Reef-builders with a sense of harmony

3 hours ago

Cold-water corals of the species Lophelia pertusa are able to fuse skeletons of genetically distinct individuals. On dives with JAGO, a research submersible stationed at GEOMAR Helmholtz Centre for Ocean Research Kiel, scientists ...

User comments : 4

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

Sazzle
3.3 / 5 (4) Dec 23, 2009
Its time to put some serious investment and mindpower into Nuclear fusion by whatever means (Laser, magnetic confinement, etc) Something akin to the manhattan project but on a Global Scale. The problem we have is that the Oil companies control the politicians who in turn control the purse strings. Breaking free of the control of fossil fuels will release humanity from the bondage of old victorian technology and could propel us into a new era of almost free energy.
freethinking
2.6 / 5 (5) Dec 23, 2009
I agree we need to break free from oil and coal (not for AGW reasons as that is a bunch of bunk). Nuclear is currently feasable, but to blame Oil Companies for stopping Fusion is showing ignorance on how difficult it is to do Fusion.

However I might agree that if all the money wasted on AGW was spent on Fusion Research, we actually might have fusion ready in the next few years.
GrayMouser
not rated yet Dec 24, 2009
Considering Pachauri's connections (investments and current employment) to TATA (deeply involved with power generation) you would expect him to say this. He stands to make more money off of this than any of us will ever see in our entire lives.
operator
1 / 5 (1) Dec 26, 2009
or perhaps if you cut back on the amount of plastic crap you consumed, hugely increased your energy efficency, desirned cities to be able to walk and cycle around, had community power generation, get the masses of people out of soul destroying minimun paid work and actually had a proper free market you might make a little bit of a dent into this.
yeah right, lets get behind fusion! wtf! just like the sham hydrogen fuel cell, you had a pretty good electric car 10 years ago but it got shelved for corperate profit, and the same shit is happening. carbon credits, hydrogen cells, techno fixes, yeah just believe you can fix it with more imput. absurd thinking

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more

Click here to reset your password.
Sign in to get notified via email when new comments are made.