Australian government to introduce Internet filter

Dec 15, 2009 By ROHAN SULLIVAN , Associated Press Writer
The joojoo, an Internet access tablet developed by Fusion Garage, is shown, Friday, Dec. 11, 2009 in New York. (AP Photo/Mark Lennihan)

(AP) -- Australia plans to introduce an Internet filtering system to block obscene and crime-linked Web sites despite concerns it will curtail freedoms and won't completely work.

Adopting a mandatory screening system would make one of the strictest Internet regulators among the world's democracies. Authoritarian regimes commonly impose controls. China drew international criticism earlier this year with plans to install on all PCs sold in the country.

The government said Tuesday it will introduce legislation next year for the filter system to help protect Australians, especially children, from harmful material on the Internet. Critics say it will not prevent determined users from sharing such content, and could lead to unwarranted censorship by overzealous officials.

Communication Minister Stephen Conroy said the government would be transparent in compiling its blacklist of Web sites, but did not give details.

Conroy said the Australian filter was among a number of new measures aimed at strengthening online protection for families. It aims to block material such as child pornography, bestiality, rape and other , along with detailed instructions about committing crimes or using .

Such material is already banned from publication on Australian sites, but the government currently has no control over it being accessed on servers overseas.

Conroy conceded it may not be completely successful.

"The government has always maintained there is no silver bullet solution to cyber-safety," he said in a statement. But, "it is important that all Australians, particularly young children, are protected from this material."

Critics say illegal material such as child pornography is often traded on peer-to-peer networks or chats, which would not be covered by the filter.

"The government knows this plan will not help Australian kids, nor will it aid in the policing of prohibited material," said Colin Jacobs, vice chairman of Electronic Frontiers Australia, a nonprofit group that seeks to promote online freedoms.

"Given the problems in maintaining a secret blacklist and deciding what goes on it, we're at a loss to explain the minister's enthusiasm for this proposal," Jacobs said in an online posting.

The group is concerned the blacklist of sites to be blocked by the filter and the reasons for doing so would be kept secret, opening the possibility that legitimate sites might be censored.

Conroy's announcement coincided with the release of a report on a monthslong trial that found Internet service providers were able to block a list of more than 1,300 sites selected by the government without significantly hampering download speeds.

Telstra, Australia's largest Internet service provider, said blacklisting offensive sites using a filter system was feasible as long as the list was limited to a defined number of Web addresses, but that no single measure would make the Internet 100 percent safe.

"The blocking of a blacklist of sites is one element of the multifaceted approach that is required to create a safer online environment," Telstra Director of Public Policy David Quilty said.

Jacobs said smaller Internet service providers would likely struggle to pay the costs of imposing the new filters. Conroy said the government would help providers implement the filters, without going into details.

The filter would not likely not be in place before early in 2011.

Countries such as Egypt and Iran impose strict Internet controls, and bloggers have been imprisoned. China has a pervasive filtering system.

Controls in democracies that value free speech are less strict, though providers have at times blocked or taken down content deemed to be offensive.

Canada, Sweden and Britain have filters, but they are voluntary. In the United States, Pennsylvania briefly imposed requirements for service providers to block child pornography sites, but a federal court struck down the law because the filters also blocked legitimate sites.

Explore further: Entrepreneur, activist Sina Khanifar on digital copyright reform

3.6 /5 (20 votes)
add to favorites email to friend print save as pdf

Related Stories

Australia says Web blacklist combats child porn

Mar 27, 2009

(AP) -- Australia's communications minister has defended a proposed Internet blacklist as necessary to combat child pornography but admitted that at least one site had been wrongly blocked during trials.

Australian Internet 'blacklist' prompts concern

Mar 20, 2009

(AP) -- A whistle-blower organization claims a secret list of Web sites that Australian authorities are proposing to ban includes such innocuous destinations as a dentist's office.

Iraq to impose controls on Internet

Aug 05, 2009

(AP) -- The Iraqi government has decided to crack down on Internet service providers and ban sites that incite violence or carry pornography, officials said Tuesday, a move that has been strongly criticized ...

Google to step up anti-porn efforts in China

Jun 19, 2009

(AP) -- Google Inc. said Friday that it was working to block pornography reaching users of its Chinese service after a mainland watchdog found the search engine turned up large numbers of links to obscene ...

Recommended for you

User comments : 9

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

ealex
4.3 / 5 (3) Dec 15, 2009
Haha, yeah because people usually associated with those types of sites won't also already know a way to stay hidden or circumvent filters.

Might as well give ME the money.
Velanarris
3.9 / 5 (7) Dec 15, 2009
Haha, yeah because people usually associated with those types of sites won't also already know a way to stay hidden or circumvent filters.

Might as well give ME the money.

A basic websense filter stops 99% of undesirable sites. The real problem here is the fact that it does curtail freedoms, and has the potential for despotic control.
Sancho
4.5 / 5 (4) Dec 15, 2009
Admire Big Brother's concern "for the children." What's up with Australia, anyway? It has by many accounts the most thuggish government in the Anglo-Saxon world. If the agenda was simply protecting innocent young minds, the government could distribute the filter to anyone who wants it. It could, conceivably, require families with children to install it. The real agenda is restricting and controlling information flow. As ealex says, those who want to circumvent censorship will always find a way. They don't need the net. If anything, use of the internet should make it easier to catch and jail child pornographers.
frajo
3.7 / 5 (3) Dec 15, 2009
[1] When I see the low rating of this important article I get the impression that some readers don't understand the meaning of rating an article.
[2] Any legal measure that can be misused will be misused. It's an empirical law which is known to the proponents of the measure.
RayCherry
not rated yet Dec 15, 2009
Canada, Sweden and Britain have filters, but they are voluntary.
Strange statement. Isn't it voluntary everywhere?

ISP's should be permitted to offer a Filetered Service to their clients, (obviously).

Accountability for the content then falls on the ISP as well as the originating Server Owners/Managers, (less obvious, and a legal grey area in most countries).

Government sanctioned filtering is almost impossible to implement as the costs of constant monitoring, the legal system's obligation for proof, and the 'hackers' sheer numbers and determination, not to mention the technology churn with (mobile/virtual servers) push the cost of this (well intended?) measure into "space programme budget" figures.

x646d63
5 / 5 (3) Dec 15, 2009
Repression never achieves its apparent goal. Educated people know this. Repressive laws are rarely designed for safety. They are designed to extend power and control.
malapropism
not rated yet Dec 15, 2009
And I wonder who the oracular Big Brother/Sister is (are) who will decide what sites go on the blacklist?
galoot
5 / 5 (2) Dec 15, 2009
unelected bureaucrats enforcing censorship with an unpublished list. Chilling.
Magnator
not rated yet Dec 19, 2009
This is ridiculous. So will they go back to stone age? lol
If you are worried about your kids, give them good advice, education and install a filter at home.
Big Brother will start with minor filters and before we notice even some "offensive news" coming from bloggers will be blocked too like in China.
Give me a break, people shouldn't accept that.