Magazine publishers creating 'iTunes for magazines': reports

Nov 25, 2009
US magazine publishers Time Inc., Conde Nast and Hearst are preparing to launch an online newsstand described as an "iTunes for magazines," according to published reports.

US magazine publishers Time Inc., Conde Nast and Hearst are preparing to launch an online newsstand described as an "iTunes for magazines," according to published reports.

The New York Times, citing "people with knowledge of the plans," said Wednesday that the formation of the new company may be announced in early December.

The newspaper said Time, Conde Nast, Hearst and another publisher, Meredith, would be equity partners in the new venture, which comes at a time of declining print circulation for many US magazines.

It said the company would offer print and electronic copies of the magazines from a single website. It would also develop software standards for magazine viewing on iPhones, BlackBerrys, electronic book readers and other platforms.

The New York Observer reported Tuesday that John Squires, a Time executive, would be the interim chief executive of the new company.

"The consortium provides one point of contact for the consumer," the Observer quoted an unidentified source as saying. "When you come to the main store, you can get the content any way you want."

Like other US newspaper and magazine publishers, Conde Nast and Time Inc. have been facing a steep drop in print , steadily declining circulation and the migration of readers to free news online.

Time Inc., publisher of Time, Fortune, Sports Illustrated, People and other magazines, is carrying out largescale layoffs after cutting around 600 jobs last year.

Time Inc. also recently shuttered several magazines including Southern Accents and Life.

Conde Nast, which owns The New Yorker, Vanity Fair and Vogue, also recently shut down several magazines including Gourmet, Modern Bride, Elegant Bride and Cookie.

(c) 2009 AFP

Explore further: Say Ello to the new privacy debate on social media

add to favorites email to friend print save as pdf

Related Stories

Major layoffs loom at Time Inc.: reports

Oct 30, 2009

Time Inc., publisher of Time, Fortune, Sports Illustrated, People and other magazines, plans to lay off some 540 employees starting next week, or six percent of its workforce, The New York Post reported Friday.

Seattle paper may have digital future

Mar 06, 2009

Time is running out for the Seattle Post-Intelligencer, whose publisher, the Hearst Corp., plans to close the money-losing newspaper if a buyer is not found by next week.

Recommended for you

Say Ello to the new privacy debate on social media

Sep 29, 2014

Ello is new social networking space on the web that is receiving a lot of attention of late – so much that it's caused a few problems with the website out of action from time to time. ...

Post-Snowden, iPhone 6 encryption fans safety debate

Sep 28, 2014

Encryption technology in the iPhone 6 has taken root in a scales-of-justice debate between privacy supporters and public safety officials. Apple is using a more advanced encryption technology.

'Anti-Facebook' social network gets viral surge

Sep 28, 2014

In a matter of days, the new social network Ello, described as the "anti-Facebook" for its stand on privacy and advertising, has become perhaps the hottest ticket on the Internet.

User comments : 1

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

RayCherry
not rated yet Nov 26, 2009
To read the equivalent of The New York Times, article by article, from iNews is going to cost less than buying the traditional newspaper?

Lols: or am I dreaming?

Change is unavoidable, but what is lost in transition is often irrevocable and in the case of quality journalism delivered to the public via an uncontrolled delivery channel ... we should think twice.

Once news delivery gets 'e'd, the delivery channel is very controlled, and news reading habits can be recorded, monitored, controlled and ultimately censored down to the individual article and the individual reader.

Ever wonder why you missed an article on here? Just bad luck? It hit the wrong channel for your reading habit? It was on today's list for only an hour? Did you ever think about it not being bad luck? Of course, it was. Wasn't it?

Because you know that you can read it elsewhere - in the papers, the books, the television - you are not worried. If all were delivered by via 'net, would you reconsider?