CO2 emissions continue significant climb

Nov 24, 2009

The annual rate of increase in carbon dioxide emissions from fossil fuels has more than tripled in this decade, compared to the 1990s, reports an international consortium of scientists, who paint a bleak picture of the Earth's future unless "CO2 emissions [are] drastically reduced."

These CO2 emissions increased at a rate of 3.4% per year from 2000 to 2008, in contrast to 1% each year in the previous decade, scientists from the Global Carbon Project report in the current issue of Nature Geoscience. The team comprises some 30 researchers from around the world, including Scott C. Doney, senior scientist at the Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution (WHOI) and Richard A. Houghton, senior scientist and acting director of the Woods Hole Research Center (WHRC).

Since 2000, the scientists documented an overall increase of 29% in global CO2 emissions. They attributed the rise to increasing production and trade of manufactured products, particularly from emerging economies, the gradual shift from oil to coal and the planet's waning capacity to absorb CO2.

Doney led a team that developed ocean-model simulations for estimating the historical variations in air-sea CO2 fluxes.

"Over the last decade, CO2 emissions have continued to climb despite efforts to control emissions," Doney said. "Preliminary evidence suggests that the land and ocean may be becoming less effective at removing CO2 from the atmosphere, which could accelerate future ."

A key element of the report, according to Doney, was the work of Houghton, acting director of WHRC. "He developed the estimates of carbon emissions from deforestation, a major source of human-driven carbon emissions," Doney said.

"Although the emissions of CO2 from deforestation accounted for only about 15% of total CO2 emissions over the period 2000-2008, reducing deforestation is one of the activities that could contribute significantly to stabilizing the concentration of CO2 in the atmosphere," Houghton said. Negotiations at COP-15 in Copenhagen next month will take up this issue in earnest.

Source: Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution

Explore further: Dutch unveil big plan to fight rising tides

add to favorites email to friend print save as pdf

Related Stories

Pricing can cut CO2 emissions from electric generators

Apr 28, 2008

Levying a price on carbon dioxide released by electric generators could considerably reduce greenhouse gas emissions — even before the deployment of any environmentally friendly technology — according to scientists in ...

Emissions irrelevant to future climate change?

Apr 28, 2008

Climate change and the carbon emissions seem inextricably linked. However, new research published in BioMed Central’s open access journal Carbon Balance and Management suggests that this may not always hold true, althou ...

Carbon study could help reduce harmful emissions

Feb 14, 2008

Earth scientists at The University of Manchester have found that carbon dioxide has been naturally stored for more than a million years in several gas fields in the Colorado Plateau and Rocky Mountains of the United States.

Fossil fuel CO2 emissions up by 29 percent since 2000

Nov 17, 2009

The strongest evidence yet that the rise in atmospheric CO2 emissions continues to outstrip the ability of the world's natural 'sinks' to absorb carbon is published this week in the journal Nature Geoscience. ...

Impact of sea-level rise on atmospheric CO2 concentrations

Jan 13, 2009

(PhysOrg.com) -- The rise in sea level since the last ice age has prevented us from feeling the full impact of man-made global warming. The sea level rise has resulted in more harmful greenhouse gases being absorbed by the ...

Recommended for you

Dutch unveil big plan to fight rising tides

7 hours ago

The Netherlands on Tuesday unveiled a multi-billion-euro, multi-decade plan to counter the biggest environmental threat to the low-lying European nation: surging seawater caused by global climate change.

Drought hits Brazil coffee harvest

9 hours ago

Coffee output in Brazil, the world's chief exporter, will slide this year after the worst drought in decades, agricultural agency Conab said Tuesday.

Landmark fracking study finds no water pollution

11 hours ago

The final report from a landmark federal study on hydraulic fracturing, or fracking, has found no evidence that chemicals or brine water from the gas drilling process moved upward to contaminate drinking water at one site ...

Politics divide coastal residents' views of environment

12 hours ago

From the salmon-rich waters of Southeast Alaska to the white sand beaches of Florida's Gulf Coast to Downeast Maine's lobster, lumber and tourist towns, coastal residents around the U.S. share a common characteristic: ...

User comments : 6

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

freethinking
2.7 / 5 (7) Nov 24, 2009
Right now all scientists and reports showing AGW and CO2 in the atmosphere should be considered suspect. Until AGW proponents can show that the leaked documents that show AGW is a scam, is fraudulent, how can anyone believe anything any of these scientist say?

http://www.physor...129.html
PinkElephant
2.8 / 5 (5) Nov 24, 2009
Nice logic there, smokey. I think by that same logic, we should also now suspect all soldiers deployed in Iraq of premeditated execution-style killings, because of the incident currently being discussed in the MSM...

On the other hand, I have a feeling the 'leaked documents' are much more of a molehill than the mountain you think they are. But then, you probably know that already. See, I do give you credit, and I understand where you're coming from. By all means, do carry on your politicking. After all, it doesn't really matter what any of us does, whether right or wrong: in the end, we all end up dead ;-)
GrayMouser
1 / 5 (2) Nov 26, 2009
Ok, given:
1) the rate of increase of CO2 emissions have increased 3 times in the last decade, and
2) the global temperature has decreased for the past decade.
From this you could come to three possible conclusions:
1) CO2 is causing the world to cool, or
2) CO2 is not a primary factor in global climate, or
3) CO2 is a primary factor and it would be a heck of a lot colder than it would have been without it.
RCB
Nov 27, 2009
This comment has been removed by a moderator.
marjon
2 / 5 (4) Nov 27, 2009
Has anyone ever looked at an IR transmission chart?
CO2 absorbs photons in specific bands and radiates in specific bands. Each molecule does this, 1 photon at a time, one molecule at a time. Given the total photo flux from the sun is limited, there is a limit to the number of photons absorbed regardless of the number of CO2 molecules.
"Because a linear increase in temperature requires an exponential increase in carbon dioxide (thanks to the physics of radiation absorption described above), we know that the next two-fold increase in CO2 will produce exactly the same temperature increase as the previous two-fold increase. "
http://brneurosci.org/co2.html

pauldentler
3 / 5 (2) Nov 28, 2009
we know that the next two-fold increase in CO2 will produce exactly the same temperature increase as the previous two-fold increase. "
http://brneurosci.org/co2.html

So what is your explanation for the temperature drop we've measured for the past ten years? Increasing CO2?
marjon
2.3 / 5 (3) Nov 28, 2009
we know that the next two-fold increase in CO2 will produce exactly the same temperature increase as the previous two-fold increase. "
http://brneurosci.org/co2.html

So what is your explanation for the temperature drop we've measured for the past ten years? Increasing CO2?

I see your point. I was trying to point out that there is a limit to the amount of heat CO2 can absorb. Doubling the amount of CO2 won't absorb twice as much energy (unless the amount of energy available to absorb doubles as well.) I good analogy I read was doubling the number of shades on a window won't make the room twice as dark.