Key scientist says politics behind stolen e-mails

Nov 24, 2009 By P. SOLOMON BANDA , Associated Press Writer

(AP) -- A leading climate change scientist said hackers breaking into a university's computer server and then posting documents online show the nasty politics of global warming.

Kevin Trenberth, head of the climate analysis section of the U.S. National Center for Atmospheric Research in Boulder, said the hackers' intentions may have been to influence discussions in an upcoming global summit in Denmark.

"It comes down to politics at sort of all levels, and some of it's nasty and some of it is trying to destroy the message or even kill the messenger so to speak," Trenberth said Monday in an interview with The Associated Press.

The University of East Anglia, in eastern England, said hackers last week stole about a decade's worth of data from a at the university's Climatic Research Unit, a leading global research center on climate change.

About 1,000 e-mails and 3,000 documents have been posted on Web sites and seized on by climate change skeptics, who claim correspondence shows collusion between scientists to overstate the case for global warming, and evidence that some have manipulated evidence.

"The messengers in this case are the scientists who are putting forward a basis for this, the basis for the climate change based on, and founded upon the facts, the measurements and the observations and our best interpretation of those," Trenberth said.

Trenberth said he's identified 102 e-mails stolen from a British university's computer server. Hackers distributed only documents that could help attempts by skeptics to undermine the scientific consensus on man-made climate change.

Many of the exchanges were between him and Phil Jones, the British research center's director. The two men worked on the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change assessments, which articulated the scientific community's consensus on in 2001 and 2007.

"What you see in those e-mails are exchanges among a whole bunch of scientists on issues," Trenberth said. "What you will find is that there is a tremendous amount of integrity, vigorous discussion about issues and exactly how to handle issues... So it's far from a whole bunch of scientists agreeing and colluding to do things. They're actually arguing, vigorously, about the science."

Trenberth, a well-respected atmospheric scientist, said it did not appear that all the documents stolen from the university had been distributed on the Internet by the hackers.

At least 65 world leaders will attend the Copenhagen climate summit in December as representatives of 191 nations seek agreement on a new global treaty on limiting emissions of greenhouse gases.

©2009 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

Explore further: HP supercomputer at NREL garners top honor

add to favorites email to friend print save as pdf

Related Stories

Scientist: Leak of climate e-mails appalling

Nov 23, 2009

(AP) -- A leading climate change scientist whose private e-mails are included in thousands of documents that were stolen by hackers and posted online said Sunday the leaks may have been aimed at undermining next month's ...

Hackers leak e-mails, stoke climate debate

Nov 21, 2009

(AP) -- Computer hackers have broken into a server at a well-respected climate change research center in Britain and posted hundreds of private e-mails and documents online - stoking debate over whether some scientists have ...

Hurricanes to intensify as Earth warms

Jun 16, 2005

Warmer oceans, more moisture in the atmosphere, and other factors suggest that human-induced climate change will increase hurricane intensity and rainfall, according to climate expert Kevin Trenberth of the National Center ...

Britain's top climatologist backs global warming claims

Mar 28, 2005

One of Britain's leading climate change experts has thrown his weight behind the claim that global warming is being caused by human activity in a report published today by the Institute of Physics. The report by Professor Ala ...

Recommended for you

Government ups air bag warning to 7.8M vehicles (Update)

18 hours ago

The U.S. government is now urging owners of nearly 8 million cars and trucks to have the air bags repaired because of potential danger to drivers and passengers. But the effort is being complicated by confusing ...

HP supercomputer at NREL garners top honor

Oct 21, 2014

A supercomputer created by Hewlett-Packard (HP) and the Energy Department's National Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL) that uses warm water to cool its servers, and then re-uses that water to heat its building, has been ...

User comments : 4

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

Doug_Huffman
2.8 / 5 (4) Nov 24, 2009
I am sure that Trenberth is correct in saying that all the documents have not been distributed to the public, and that may be the essence of the skeptics' complaint, that all the data has not been honestly and evenhandedly evaluated.

Science is not a body of knowledge unimpeachable, incontrovertible and unfalsifiable but a way of thought that leads inexorably to the truth.
RobertKLR
5 / 5 (2) Nov 24, 2009
I have long maintained that because of the way the whole subject has been handled by the scientist and the media that this was bound to happen.
marjon
3.7 / 5 (3) Nov 24, 2009
Politics and greed (check out Gore's investments) are behind AGW.

Where was the outrage when the NYT leaked national security secrets?
DozerIAm
3.7 / 5 (3) Nov 24, 2009
These emails seem to indicate that there was in fact significant colluding of AGW believers against AGW skeptics, not only in how to present the believer side in an intentionally biased way but also in how to block publication of studies from the skeptic side. How exactly is this science? (rhetorical question, its not science its politics)