Self-sacrifice among strangers has more to do with nurture than nature

Oct 12, 2009
In this schematic representation, garb is a proxy for social behavior. Researchers have found that in groups with diasporas, behavior is not necessarily genetically handed down, but rather it is something culturally absorbed. Immigrants to a new culture tend to "do as Romans do" after assimilating. Credit: Zina Deretsky, National Science Foundation

(PhysOrg.com) -- Socially learned behavior and belief are much better candidates than genetics to explain the self-sacrificing behavior we see among strangers in societies, from soldiers to blood donors to those who contribute to food banks. This is the conclusion of a study by Adrian V. Bell and colleagues from the University of California Davis in the Oct. 12 edition of Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

Altruism has long been a subject of interest to evolutionary social scientists. Altruism presents them with a difficult line to argue: behaviors that help unrelated people while being costly to the individual and creating a risk for genetic descendants could not likely be favored by evolution: at least by common evolutionary arguments.

The researchers used a mathematical equation, called the Price equation, that describes the conditions for altruism to evolve. This equation motivated the researchers to compare the genetic and the cultural differentiation between neighboring social groups. Using previously calculated estimates of , they used the World Values Survey (whose questions are likely to be heavily influenced by culture in a large number of countries) as a source of data to compute the cultural differentiation between the same neighboring groups. When compared they found that the role of culture had a much greater scope for explaining our pro-social behavior than genetics.

In applying their results to ancestral populations, the World Values Survey was less useful. But ancient , such as exclusion from the marriage market, denial of the fruits of cooperative activities, banishment and execution happen now as they did then. These activities would have exerted strong selection against genes tending toward , and presumably in favor of genes that predisposed individuals toward being pro-social rather than anti-social. This would result in the gene-culture coevolution of human prosocial propensities.

Bell is currently continuing his research in Tonga, where he is planning through ethnography to estimate statistically what social learning behaviors people have in general that may explain the distribution of cultural beliefs across the Tongan Islands. He is developing a survey instrument that will help capture people's cultural beliefs and measure the effect of migration on the similarities and differences between populations.

Source: National Science Foundation (news : web)

Explore further: Local homicide rate increases cause more elementary students to fail school

add to favorites email to friend print save as pdf

Related Stories

Eastern independence, Western conformity?

Jun 13, 2008

While the act of selecting an everyday writing utensil seems to be a simple enough task, scientists have found that it actually could shed light on complex cultural differences.

Study: Gorillas also have culture

Feb 21, 2006

U.S. scientists reportedly have identified the hallmark of culture -- behavior passed on by social rather than genetic influences -- among gorillas.

Good behavior, religiousness may be genetic

Apr 06, 2007

A new study in Journal of Personality shows that selfless and social behavior is not purely a product of environment, specifically religious environment. After studying the behavior of adult twins, researchers found that, ...

Recommended for you

Creative activities outside work can improve job performance

1 hour ago

Employees who pursue creative activities outside of work may find that these activities boost their performance on the job, according to a new study by San Francisco State University organizational psychologist Kevin Eschleman ...

User comments : 5

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

RobertKarlStonjek
not rated yet Oct 12, 2009
This explanation only works if a significant proportion of a population already had the altruistic trait and fails for the emergence of the trait when new as greedy individuals could easily outcompete a minority of altruistic individuals.

If it is cultural, then these researchers will have no trouble teaching altruism to psychopaths, at least the non-violent ones...

I think it's back to the drawing board for these guys...
mogmich
not rated yet Oct 13, 2009
If this explanation is correct, it means that in all stable human societies, the majority is more or less altruistic. And that living in a stable society is crucial for human survival.

This is probably the case, and has always been.
ArtflDgr
1 / 5 (1) Oct 13, 2009
when they can train an aligator to be nuturing then i will concede. till then, the hardware cant do anything outside its framweork of operation. maybe that framework amazes people with heads in the books all the time who cant actually get up and do much. its not that the bumblebee cant fly, its that scientists have such hubris to deny reality. money from state increases said hubris till they can find actually anything, even if it isnt there.
designmemetic
not rated yet Oct 19, 2009
this strikes me as a basic meme analysis project. Nice to see it being undertaken. Unfortunately my strong suspicion is that altruism is a very complex trait that would be a co-factor of biology, sociology, and maybe some game theory.

p.s. if you were an extraterrestrial secretly watching our planet would you a) stay hidden and use it as a laboratory to learn more about the development of altruism in your own species or b) boldly introduce yourself and upset the natural order of evolution?
frajo
1 / 5 (1) Oct 19, 2009
if you were an extraterrestrial secretly watching our planet would you a) stay hidden and use it as a laboratory to learn more about the development of altruism in your own species or b) boldly introduce yourself and upset the natural order of evolution?

There is no "unnatural" evolution.
To answer your question I'd like to refer to Boris and Arkady Strugatsky's novel "Hard to Be a God" which demonstrates that good intentions and god-like power are not sufficient to get a good work done.

More news stories

Down's chromosome cause genome-wide disruption

The extra copy of Chromosome 21 that causes Down's syndrome throws a spanner into the workings of all the other chromosomes as well, said a study published Wednesday that surprised its authors.