Stock graphs can mislead: People prefer stocks with shorter runs

Sep 21, 2009

Can the way stock information is presented lead investors to make the wrong decisions? A new study in the Journal of Consumer Research shows that when investors use charts, they are likely to make a baseless decision about the riskiness of a stock based on its run-length.

Stock graphs are everywhere, available on financial and public websites to be loaded and customized by users. Authors Priya Raghubir (New York University) and Sanjiv R. Das (Santa Clara University) found that believe that stocks with shorter up-and-down movements are less risky than those with longer run-length. This is called the "run-length" effect.

They tested three groups -- affluent Californians, undergraduates, and general investors -- and found that all three judged a with a shorter run-length more favorably. They found that the run-length effect increases with greater education and frequency, length, and diversity of trading experience.

They conclude that because of the large amount of data presented on a graph, investors simplify their task by sampling points from a financial instrument's price history to estimate trend and noise. The sampling strategy leads to perceptual biases when the sample points are not representative of the price series.

The authors believe there are public policy implications that might lead to how data is presented because "systematic biases in risk perceptions may permeate the market uniformly, resulting in persistent biases in prices. . . From a consumer perspective, individual investors should be made aware of their biases in appraising and comparing stocks using charts."

"These results have implications for how financial information is communicated to investors," the authors write. The visual display of stock information has increased and the number of commercial purveyors of stock analysis information has mushroomed… From a public policy perspective, regulators should consider imposing guidelines about how financial information is presented to individuals, akin to mandatory labeling by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA).

More information: Priya Raghubir and Sanjiv R. Das. " The Long and Short of It: Why Are Stocks with Shorter Runs Preferred?" : April 2010 (published online September 17, 2009).

Source: University of Chicago (news : web)

Explore further: Decoding ethnic labels

add to favorites email to friend print save as pdf

Related Stories

Stock Price Correlated to Likeability of Super Bowl Ads

Jan 26, 2009

(PhysOrg.com) -- When TV viewers like a company's Super Bowl commercial, the company's stock price goes up, according to a study by researchers at the University at Buffalo School of Management and Cornell University.

Recommended for you

Decoding ethnic labels

10 hours ago

If you are of Latin American descent, do you call yourself Chicano? Latino? Hispanic?

Local education politics 'far from dead'

Jul 29, 2014

Teach for America, known for recruiting teachers, is also setting its sights on capturing school board seats across the nation. Surprisingly, however, political candidates from the program aren't just pushing ...

First grade reading suffers in segregated schools

Jul 29, 2014

A groundbreaking study from the Frank Porter Graham Child Development Institute (FPG) has found that African-American students in first grade experience smaller gains in reading when they attend segregated schools—but the ...

Why aren't consumers buying remanufactured products?

Jul 29, 2014

Firms looking to increase market share of remanufactured consumer products will have to overcome a big barrier to do so, according to a recent study from the Penn State Smeal College of Business. Findings from faculty members ...

Expecting to teach enhances learning, recall

Jul 29, 2014

People learn better and recall more when given the impression that they will soon have to teach newly acquired material to someone else, suggests new research from Washington University in St. Louis.

User comments : 0