'Biotech violin' outdoes Stradivarius

Sep 14, 2009
The five instruments played during the test. Visually, there is very little difference between them. (Photo: Egmont Seiler)

At the 27th "Osnabrücker Baumpflegetagen," one of Germany’s most important annual conferences on all aspects of forest husbandry, Empa researcher Francis Schwarze’s "biotech violin" dared to go head to head in a blind test against a stradivarius -- and won. A brilliant outcome for the Empa violin, which is made of wood treated with fungus, against the instrument made by the great master himself in 1711.

September 1st 2009 was a day of reckoning for Empa scientist Francis Schwarze and the Swiss maker Michael Rhonheimer. The violin they had created using wood treated with a specially selected fungus was to take part in a blind test against an instrument made in 1711 by the master violin maker of Cremona himself, Antonio .

In the test, the British star violinist Matthew Trusler played five different instruments behind a curtain, so that the audience did not know which was being played. One of the violins Trusler played was his own strad, worth two million dollars. The other four were all made by Rhonheimer - two with fungally-treated wood, the other two with untreated wood. A jury of experts, together with the conference participants, judged the tone quality of the violins. Of the more than 180 attendees, an overwhelming number - 90 persons - felt the tone of the fungally treated violin «Opus 58» to be the best. Trusler’s stradivarius reached second place with 39 votes, but amazingly enough 113 members of the audience thought that «Opus 58» was actually the strad! «Opus 58» is made from wood which had been treated with fungus for the longest time, nine months.

Judging the tone quality of a musical instrument in a blind test is, of course, an extremely subjective matter, since it is a question of pleasing the human senses. Empa scientist Schwarze is fully aware of this, and as he says, “There is no unambiguous scientific way of measuring tone quality.” He was therefore, understandably, rather nervous before the test. Since the beginning of the 19th century violins made by Stradivarius have been compared to instruments made by others in so called blind tests, the most serious of all probably being that organized by the BBC in 1974. In that test the world famous violinists Isaac Stern and Pinchas Zukerman together with the English violin dealer Charles Beare were challenged to identify blind the «Chaconne» stradivarius made in 1725, a «Guarneri del Gesu» of 1739, a «Vuillaume» of 1846 and a modern instrument made by the English master violin maker Roland Praill. The result was rather sobering - none of the experts was able to correctly identify more than two of the four instruments, and in fact two of the jurors thought that the modern instrument was actually the «Chaconne» stradivarius.

Violins made by the Italian master Antonio Giacomo Stradivarius are regarded as being of unparalleled quality even today, with enthusiasts being prepared to pay millions for a single example. Stradivarius himself knew nothing of fungi which attack wood, but he received inadvertent help from the “Little Ice Age” which occurred from 1645 to 1715. During this period Central Europe suffered long winters and cool summers which caused trees to grow slowly and uniformly - ideal conditions in fact for producing wood with excellent acoustic qualities.

Horst Heger of the Osnabruck City Conservatory is convinced that the success of the “fungus violin” represents a revolution in the field of classical music. “In the future even talented young musicians will be able to afford a violin with the same tonal quality as an impossibly expensive Stradivarius,” he believes. In his opinion, the most important factor in determining the tone of a violin is the quality of the wood used in its manufacture. This has now been confirmed by the results of the blind test in Osnabruck. The fungal attack changes the cell structure of the wood, reducing its density and simultaneously increasing its homogeneity. “Compared to a conventional instrument, a violin made of treated with the has a warmer, more rounded sound,” explains Francis Schwarze. 

Source: EMPA

Explore further: China's reform of R&D budget management doesn't go far enough, research shows

add to favorites email to friend print save as pdf

Related Stories

Wood density explains sound quality of great master violins

Jul 02, 2008

The advantage of using medical equipment to study classical musical instruments has been proven by a Dutch researcher from the Leiden University Medical Center (LUMC). In collaboration with a renowned luthier, Dr. Berend ...

Carbon copying the 'Stradivarius' sound

Sep 11, 2009

(PhysOrg.com) -- It's every violinmaker's dream to produce an instrument to rival the sound of a Stradivarius but now researchers at The University of Nottingham are trying to do just that… using acoustic physics and carbon ...

Recommended for you

Precarious work schedules common among younger workers

Aug 29, 2014

One wish many workers may have this Labor Day is for more control and predictability of their work schedules. A new report finds that unpredictability is widespread in many workers' schedules—one reason ...

User comments : 6

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

THEY
not rated yet Sep 14, 2009
I wonder what other wooden instruments this would be beneficial to?
jeremyyy
5 / 5 (1) Sep 14, 2009
I was wondering how long it was going to take to reproduce and/or surpass the quality of Stradivarius's instruments since it was determined that the "Little Ice Age" affected the wood utilized in the creation of his masterpiece instruments. @ THEY I assume that it would benefit any bowed string instrument in the violin family.
NickFun
not rated yet Sep 14, 2009
The opening paragraph describes it as a "stradivarius" whereas is should be "Stradivarius". Just the writer in me coming out.
jeremyyy
not rated yet Sep 14, 2009
The opening paragraph describes it as a "stradivarius" whereas is should be "Stradivarius". Just the writer in me coming out.


I learned a long time ago that online news articles tend to have more spelling and grammatical mistakes than traditional print articles. Thus, I just ignore such mistakes.
samlehmanwilzig
5 / 5 (1) Sep 16, 2009
"Impossibly expensive" may be a thing of the past. Price is set by two main elements: quality of tone and rarity of object. The latter stays the same, but the former now plummets. Indeed, as more and more higher quality Empa violins come on stream with better tone quality than the Stradivarius violins, the latter will eventually become no more than "antiques" with the usual price of such an artifact.
docknowledge
not rated yet Sep 21, 2009
"Impossibly expensive" may be a thing of the past. Price is set by two main elements: quality of tone and rarity of object. The latter stays the same, but the former now plummets. Indeed, as more and more higher quality Empa violins come on stream with better tone quality than the Stradivarius violins, the latter will eventually become no more than "antiques" with the usual price of such an artifact.

It's about time something was offsetting the millions of dollars being spent to make electric guitars sound better. It's like, duh, yeah of course an electronic instrument created to sound good on an iPod is going to have an edge, when on an iPod. For those who haven't damaged their hearing, however, the human ear can easily reach 20,000 hz. Far above, if you are young (or lucky). Typical iPod max? 5,000 hz. Perfect for high volume rock and elevator music.