$100 million question: Where's broadband in US?

Sep 12, 2009 By PETER SVENSSON and JOELLE TESSLER , AP Technology Writers
FILE - In this May 30, 2007 file photo, Craig Santos of Eustis Cable in Brookfield, Vt. installs fiber optic cable for Comcast in Ira, Vt. The stimulus package championed by the Obama administration set aside up to $350 million to create a national broadband map. That struck some people in the telecommunications industry as excessive. (AP Photo/Toby Talbot, file)

(AP) -- The national stimulus package passed by Congress in February may have been too enthusiastic about spending money on one particular project: figuring out where broadband Internet access is available and how fast it is.

The $787 billion stimulus bill championed by the Obama administration set aside up to $350 million to create a national map that could guide policies aimed at expanding high-speed Internet access. That $350 million tag struck some people in the as excessive, compared with existing, smaller efforts. The map won't even be done in time to help decide where to spend much of the $7.2 billion in stimulus money earmarked for broadband programs.

Now it appears the final cost won't be as high as $350 million - though just how much it will be is unclear.

To ensure the mapping money is used "in a fiscally prudent manner," the National Telecommunications and Information Administration signaled Wednesday it would initially spend more than $100 million, and then reassess the program.

The agency, which is part of the Commerce Department, said it has received requests for $107 million in funding for projects that would map broadband in individual states over the first two years. The states want another $26 million for various purposes over five years, including steps to encourage broadband demand. On top of that, the NTIA will have to spend more money to collate the statewide maps into a national one.

But while the map should run much less than the $350 million cap set by Congress, the total still looks like it will be far higher than estimates based on the costs of smaller mapping programs in individual states.

In North Carolina, for instance, state broadband authority e-NC spends at most $275,000 per year on maintaining a map of broadband availability in the state, detailed enough to list individual addresses, according to executive director Jane Smith Patterson.

Rory Altman, director at telecommunications consulting firm Altman Vilandrie & Co., which has helped clients map broadband availability in some areas, said $350 million was a "ridiculous" amount of money to spend on a national broadband map.

Even $100 million might be high. The firm could create a national broadband map for $3.5 million, and "would gladly do it for $35 million," Altman said.

Dave Burstein, editor of the DSL Prime broadband industry newsletter, believes a reasonable cost for the map would be less than $30 million.

The map should reveal what most individuals already know: whether their homes can get broadband, and how fast it is. Officially, the goal for the map is to help shape broadband policy and determine where best to invest government funds. It may also help consumers shopping for Internet service.

However, the map won't be ready in time to influence the first round of broadband grants and loans funded by the stimulus package. That money will start going out this fall. And the map likely won't be finished before February's scheduled release of a national broadband plan being developed by the Federal Communications Commission, which is also mandated by the stimulus bill.

About two-thirds of U.S. homes already have broadband. It's available to many more, perhaps 90 percent of homes, but the figure is uncertain because of the lack of authoritative nationwide studies. The cable industry alone says it covers 92 percent of U.S. households.

When the Pew Internet and American Life Project surveyed people who didn't have broadband in 2007 and 2008, it found that most of them aren't interested in it, find the Internet too hard to use, or don't have computers. Lack of available broadband was the third most common reason.

Still, there is concern that the U.S. is falling behind other countries in the reach and speed of its Internet connections, and that this might hinder economic growth. Advocates of expanding broadband also worry that some rural areas might never get because service providers don't see a payoff in extending their lines there.

Identifying those areas will be a major thrust of the mapping project. The maps will show broadband availability, type (phone or cable, for example) and speeds for each small cluster of homes, roughly equivalent to a city block in urban areas.

Each state's grant for mapping will go to either a nonprofit or a government agency. Internet service providers have already committed to handing over data about where they have broadband coverage, so the main job will be to collect and translate that information into a map.

Mark Seifert, who is overseeing the broadband grant and mapping programs at the NTIA, offers several reasons why the federal government may spend proportionally more on mapping than some states. For one thing, he said, most efforts that have been done in states have focused on so-called "last-mile" connections that link homes and businesses with the broader infrastructure of the Internet. The NTIA also wants extensive data on that behind-the-scenes Internet infrastructure.

What's more, since much of the mapping data will come from phone and cable companies, the NTIA wants the information to be independently verified - which could involve knocking on doors to confirm where broadband is and is not available and conducting other on-the-ground checks.

"You can spend less money on a map ... but you get what you pay for," he said. "Data costs money."

Although the map will not be done in time to guide this round of broadband funding in the , it could prove useful for later broadband deployment programs. And it could help set priorities in the years ahead for huge federal programs such as the Universal Service Fund and the Rural Utilities Service, which spend billions of dollars annually to subsidize telecom services.

In addition to the NTIA's mapping project, there's a parallel push at the FCC to gather more detailed data on broadband subscribers. Both efforts are designed to aid the Obama administration's goal of "data-driven decision making" in setting telecom policy, said Colin Crowell, a senior counselor to FCC Chairman Julius Genachowski.

"There is a voracious appetite for all kinds of broadband data," said Crowell, who helped write the broadband mapping legislation as a staffer on a House subcommittee overseeing telecommunications. "Policymakers have been wringing their hands for several years that we don't have accurate data on broadband deployment and adoption."

©2009 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

Explore further: Scientists twist radio beams to send data: Transmissions reach speeds of 32 gigabits per second

add to favorites email to friend print save as pdf

Related Stories

Telco companies to provide data for broadband map

Aug 08, 2009

(AP) -- The country's biggest phone and cable companies have agreed to hand over information about their broadband networks to help the federal government produce a national map showing where high-speed Internet connections ...

FCC gets going on national broadband plan

Apr 08, 2009

(AP) -- The Federal Communications Commission took the first step Wednesday in developing a comprehensive plan to give all Americans high-speed Internet access.

Survey: Elderly, poor narrow broadband service gap

Jun 18, 2009

(AP) -- Some groups that have lagged in signing up for high-speed Internet service, like the elderly, the poor and rural residents, have started to gain on those who have had a head start, according to a new survey.

Recommended for you

Cutting congestion on the data network highway

Sep 12, 2014

Perhaps no other consumer-driven technology has made such incredible advances in such a relatively short space of time as the mobile phone. Today's smartphones are used to stream videos, access social media ...

T-Mobile to sell phones that call, text on Wi-Fi (Update)

Sep 10, 2014

T-Mobile will sell more than 100 smartphone models with a built-in feature that taps into Wi-Fi networks to make phone calls and send texts when customers can't connect to the wireless carrier's cellular network.

User comments : 8

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

Velanarris
not rated yet Sep 13, 2009
Did they think of jsut asking the providers for accurate resource maps?

Probably would have been easier, and even cheaper than the state maps.
JerryPark
not rated yet Sep 13, 2009
We must judge the results by the goal. The goal was to waste large amounts of money. Bingo.
docknowledge
1 / 5 (1) Sep 13, 2009
Gimme a break. Those speeds are only need to steal movies.

Obama, in this respect, forget the middle class, lower class or whatever you are representing. The US doesn't need to spend a dime in the next ten years "upgrading" Internet speed. So displaying a page takes 45 seconds, instead of 30. What does 15 seconds work out to at minimum wage?
Bob_Wallace
5 / 5 (1) Sep 13, 2009
docknowledge - How long has it been since you operated using dialup? Do you know the restrictions presented when your access is satellite ISP?

Do you always use bogus numbers in your arguments?
vika_Tae
not rated yet Sep 13, 2009
'displaying a page' is all well and good, but for any interactive real-time application - and no I am not referring to games - these levels are required.
weewilly
not rated yet Sep 13, 2009
When there is little of no oversight as to how quickly this printed money goes out to greedy hands with nothing of value returned, that is wasteful spending. But this is what they American Government does best these days.
Shulin
not rated yet Sep 17, 2009
docknowledge apparently has never used the internet.

Streaming services like Netflix/Hulu/etc, purchasing games and software online, digital distribution in general, all require large amounts of bandwidth. Pull your head out of it's hole and realize that there are more uses to the internet than just plain web browsing.
docknowledge
5 / 5 (1) Sep 22, 2009
docknowledge apparently has never used the internet.

Streaming services like Netflix/Hulu/etc, purchasing games and software online, digital distribution in general, all require large amounts of bandwidth. Pull your head out of it's hole and realize that there are more uses to the internet than just plain web browsing.


So it takes 6 minutes to download a game expansion pack, instead of 9. Your point is that you are willing to pay $100s of dollars a year to save a few minutes when you probably aren't even watching the computer? I'm not.