Court rejects cap on cable market share -- again

Aug 28, 2009 By DEBORAH YAO , AP Business Writer

(AP) -- An appeals court overturned a rule that said a cable TV company could not serve more than 30 percent of the nation's subscribers. The verdict Friday was a victory for the largest cable company, Comcast Corp., which has 25 percent share and sued to block the rule.

It was an embarrassing decision for the , which had already seen the cap rejected and imposed it again. Friday's ruling from the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit called the limit "arbitrary and capricious," and threw it out.

Fearing a cable , Congress in 1992 directed the FCC to set limits on how many customers cable TV operators could reach nationwide. The FCC set the 30 percent limit, but that was thrown out twice by the courts. Two years ago, under then-FCC Chairman Kevin Martin, the same cap was reinstated, prompting the new challenge from Comcast.

In the ruling, the noted - at times with sarcasm and thinly veiled incredulity - that the FCC sought to justify the previously rejected cap by recalculating its formula. But the outcome remained the same at 30 percent.

"The Commission concluded no cable operator could safely be allowed to serve - mirabile dictu (roughly "it's a wonder to say") - more than 30 percent of all subscribers," the court said. The ruling then quoted the French expression that translates as "The more things change, the more things stay the same."

The FCC had argued that a cable TV operator with enough market clout could choose not to carry a cable channel, thereby causing it to fail and diminishing the diversity of programming available to consumers.

But the court noted that the FCC admitted its analysis did not fully reflect the impact of satellite TV companies, which now serve about a third of households with pay TV and could carry a network if major cable operators did not. Moreover, phone companies are offering TV services now and also could carry cable channels and contribute to their survival.

The court said that in its 2001 rejection of the same cap, it instructed the FCC to consider such competitors to cable. "The Commission nonetheless failed to heed our direction and we are again faced with the same objections to the rationale for the cap," Friday's ruling said.

and the cable industry applauded the decision. Ken Ferree, president of The Progress & Freedom Foundation, a think that that supports market-oriented policies, said the FCC's cable cap "was nothing more than `abracadabra - here's the limit.' That's no way to run a government."

The FCC, which is now led by Obama appointee Julius Genachowski, said the commission is reviewing the decision and will take it into account on future actions to implement the law.

One FCC commissioner, Robert McDowell, was more vocal, saying he had disagreed with the decision to re-impose the cap in 2007. He said he felt the rule was vulnerable to a challenge given that it had already been overturned. He said that the commission's cap was based on "aging data and questionable assumptions" that didn't adequately reflect the entry of new competitors to cable operators.

"In the future, outcomes in our proceedings should be driven by the facts and law, rather than the other way around," McDowell said in a statement.

But Media Access Project, an advocacy law firm that represented parties who joined the side of the FCC in the lawsuit, said it was disappointed by the ruling and will consult with the commission whether a Supreme Court review is feasible. If not, it will ask Congress to pass laws to insure more choice and lower cable TV prices.

"This is not the end of the fight," said CEO Andrew Jay Schwartzman.

©2009 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

Explore further: Millions without mobile phone service in Argentina

add to favorites email to friend print save as pdf

Related Stories

Comcast to sell advertising for Verizon FiOS TV

Jun 24, 2009

(AP) -- Setting aside their rivalry in the interests of business, Comcast Corp. said Wednesday it will sell advertising for Verizon Communications Inc.'s FiOS television service in 10 markets where they both compete.

Cable TV companies mull impact of online video

Apr 01, 2009

(AP) -- Cable TV operators have treaded gingerly with online video. The companies want to meet consumer demand for watching shows on the Internet. But they don't want cable TV to lose its place as the home's main entertainment ...

FCC Sets Digital TV Rules

Apr 27, 2007

The FCC adopts measures to ensure a smooth transition to DTV in 2009, which is necessary to free up the 700MHz band for wireless voice and data.

Recommended for you

Britain's BT in talks to buy mobile operator EE

Dec 15, 2014

BT Group PLC said Monday it is in exclusive talks to buy mobile phone operator EE from Germany's Deutsche Telekom and France's Orange for 12.5 billion pounds ($20 billion) in cash and shares.

Re-imagining the network

Dec 12, 2014

Communication networks are evolving to keep pace with increasing consumer needs and business demands. We've already experienced the progressive jumps from 1G to 4G wireless networks and 5G is looming in the not-too-distant ...

High-speed Internet on its way to more schools

Dec 11, 2014

The Federal Communications Commission agreed Thursday to dramatically boost spending to bring high-speed Internet access to schools and libraries in poor or rural areas, a move that would likely increase Americans' phone ...

User comments : 4

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

Caliban
1 / 5 (1) Aug 28, 2009
Yes- why try to fight monopoly? Afterall, think of the savings in operating costs- through job-elimination alone, millions could be saved every year! And we know that we can depend on the good folks at comcast to provide us with the broadest possible choice of programming, telecom, and internet service delivered on a continually upgraded state-of-the-art network, and all for just pennies over their operating costs.
I'm sure that we could expect to be virtually drowned in the flow of the milk of comcast's benevolence.
Royale
1 / 5 (1) Aug 28, 2009
Some of the finest sarcasm I've seen on here Caliban. You remind me of Maddox. http://maddox.xmission.com
vika_Tae
not rated yet Aug 29, 2009
Actually, it could be seen as a good thing - cable ethernet rolled out to more individuals.
Royale
not rated yet Aug 31, 2009
I think the main problem is that it's perpetuating less competition. Regardless on whether it becomes available to a few more people... I'm pretty sure it's available to mostly everyone living in a city or suburb in the US.

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more

Click here to reset your password.
Sign in to get notified via email when new comments are made.