Solving the phase problem in x-ray diffraction

Aug 26, 2009 By Miranda Marquit feature

(PhysOrg.com) -- Nearly 100 years ago, in 1912, a paper by Max von Laue made it possible to use x-rays to study the structure of different crystalline substances. He won a Nobel Prize in 1914 for his work, but, even so, the method was limited. Without being able to measure the phases of the diffracted beams, it is only possible to use Laue’s method to get a partial description of material structures.

“While Laue’s work was very important, it doesn’t provide the complete picture,” Emil Wolf tells PhysOrg.com. “Even though we have an idea of how DNA and other substances are structured, thanks in part to this process, it is really an approximation. There is actually data missing to give us a complete picture of many of the structures we are familiar with.”

Wolf is a researcher at the University of Rochester in Rochester, New York. He shows that by reformulating the problem of phase measurement in diffracted x-ray beams, it might be possible to better study the structures of many materials, providing a more complete picture. “Instead of trying to measure beam phases - something that is practically impossible and meaningless,” Wolf points out. “One should measure instead certain correlations collected with averages.” His efforts are reported in Physical Review Letters: “Solution of the Phase Problem in the Theory of Structure Determination of Crystals from Experiments.”

“Part of the problem is that many assumptions are made based on an idealized version of a beam,” Wolf continues. “Unfortunately, the usual assumptions are unrealistic. Beams are not monochromatic; they are irregular. Instead of trying to make [impossible] measurements of erratic phase variations or estimating it with a an idealized rendition, we propose using measurable functions to obtain the missing data.”

Having the ability to more accurately probe the structures of many materials could be useful going forward from a fundamental standpoint as well as a practical standpoint. “Great recognition has been given for just approximations. Having more complete structures could be even more helpful. For medicine and chemistry, this would be helpful because in order to make improvements to drugs, you want to known how the atoms arranged. This could have great implications in physics, chemistry and medicine as well,” says Wolf.

The next step, Wolf says, is to prove his work experimentally. He has done a great deal of work to study the feasibility of testing out his equations and methods, and he feels that it is something doable. “There has been some interest from experimental groups and other researchers who want to try this out. There are some facilities that are equipped to try this out. It may take some time to work out how to do it, but it is only a matter of time.”

Wolf continues: “I’ve been examining some of the literature, and it appears that it is possible. What we’ve come up with measuring beam correlations offers a new principle for a more complete solution to a very basic problem. It may take some time before other scientists appreciate these results, but this issue is too important and this solution has too much potential to be set aside.”

More Information: Emil Wolf, “Solution of the Phase Problem in the Theory of Structure Determination of Crystals from X-Ray Diffraction Experiments,” Physical Review Letters (2009). Available online: http://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevLett.103.075501.

Copyright 2009 PhysOrg.com.
All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed in whole or part without the express written permission of PhysOrg.com.

Explore further: What's next for the Large Hadron Collider?

add to favorites email to friend print save as pdf

Related Stories

New interferometer could simplify materials research

Aug 13, 2009

(PhysOrg.com) -- “Most current hard x-ray interferometers are based on crystals, which require their high quality and high mechanical stability,” Anatoly Snigirev tells PhysOrg.com. “This can make x-ray interferometry quite ...

Getting rid of the twin image that plagues holography

Jun 19, 2007

For decades, since the ability to create a holographic record was discovered, a problem has plagued the field. “In holography,” Tatiana Latychevskaia tells PhysOrg.com, “a twin image unfortunately appears. It is see ...

Could a quantum motor do work?

Jul 07, 2009

(PhysOrg.com) -- Ever since the idea of a quantum world was discovered, physicists have been trying their best to create applications and uses that mirror the accomplishments of the classical world. However, due to the fact ...

Why Does Water Expand When it Cools? A New Explanation

Jul 17, 2009

(PhysOrg.com) -- Most of us, when we take our first science classes, learn that when things cool down, they shrink. (When they heat up, we learn, they usually expand.) However, water seems to be the exception ...

Recommended for you

What's next for the Large Hadron Collider?

19 hours ago

The world's most powerful particle collider is waking up from a well-earned rest. After roughly two years of heavy maintenance, scientists have nearly doubled the power of the Large Hadron Collider (LHC) ...

User comments : 1

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

Alizee
Aug 26, 2009
This comment has been removed by a moderator.
holoman
2 / 5 (2) Aug 26, 2009
Sure wish the flipping applet and calculations were
that easy in realtime but it isn't unfortunately,
no more said.

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more

Click here to reset your password.
Sign in to get notified via email when new comments are made.