Extinction runs in the family

Aug 06, 2009 By Susan Brown
Survivors. Venus clams, a large family with more than 500 living species, made it through the most recent mass extinction. Credit: K.J. McClure, College of William and Mary

(PhysOrg.com) -- Global calamities like the one that doomed most dinosaurs forever alter the varieties of life found on Earth, but new research shows that it doesn't take a catastrophe to end entire lineages. An analysis of 200 million years of history for marine clams found that vulnerability to extinction runs in evolutionary families, even when the losses result form ongoing, background rates of extinction.

"Biologists have long suspected that the of species and lineages play a big role in determining their vulnerability to extinction, with some branches of the tree of life being more extinction-prone than others," said Kaustuv Roy, a biology professor at the University of California, San Diego, noting that human activities threaten some evolutionary lineages of living vertebrates more than others. "Now we know that such differential loss is not restricted to extinctions driven by us but is a general feature of the extinction process itself."

Roy and colleagues Gene Hunt of the Smithsonian Institution and David Jablonski of the University of Chicago report their findings in Science this week.

Lost. In an earlier age, these marine bivalves called rudists were so abundant they formed reefs. Rudists vanished in the mass extinction at the end of the Cretaceous period. Credit: Mark A. Wilson, The College of Wooster

Their study focused on marine bivalves such as clams, oysters, mussels, and scallops, whose tough shells fossilize well to provide a rich record for study. By analyzing a global database of bivalve fossils stretching from the to the present, the researchers noted when each genus disappeared and whether their relatives disappeared at the same time.

On average, closely related clusters of clams vanished together more often than expected by chance.

"Both background extinctions, which represent most extinctions in the history of life, and mass extinctions tend to be clumped into particular evolutionary lineages," Jablonski said.

The effect was particularly strong during the at the end of the , when clam lineages with the highest 'background' rates of extinction during more normal times were hardest hit. Three families with the highest background rates disappeared entirely. Two others, with rates more than twice the median, suffered heavy losses and have not recovered to this day.

"Big extinctions have a filtering effect. They tend to preferentially cull the more vulnerable lineages, leaving the resistant ones to proliferate afterwards," Hunt said.

When extinctions are scattered randomly across the evolutionary tree, the breadth of evolutionary history remains represented among living things, even when many species are lost. Clumped extinctions do the opposite, disproportionately removing the deeper history.

"Extinctions in the past and presumably in the future will lop off chunks of evolutionary trees, not just prune the trees and leave most of the history intact," Jablonski said.

The message for conservation is to focus efforts on vulnerable lineages, the authors say. To preserve the full spectrum of evolutionary history found among living things today, the most fragile families will need careful protection.

Even relatively low levels of threat could eliminate large limbs, Roy said. "If you have whole lineages more vulnerable than others, then very soon, even with relatively moderate levels of extinction, you start to lose a lot of evolutionary history."

Source: University of California - San Diego (news : web)

Explore further: Bees able to spot which flowers offer best rewards before landing

add to favorites email to friend print save as pdf

Related Stories

Study Pinpoints Tropics as Biodiversity Spawning Ground

Oct 05, 2006

A team of scientists has completed a study that explains why the tropics are so much richer in biodiversity than higher latitudes. And they say that their work highlights the importance of preserving those ...

Exceptions prove rule of tropical importance in biodiversity

Nov 07, 2007

Even a group of shellfish that appear to violate the overarching pattern of global biodiversity actually follows the same biological rules as other marine organisms, confirming a general theory for the spread of life on Earth. ...

Recommended for you

Classic Lewis Carroll character inspires new ecological model

15 hours ago

Inspired by the Red Queen in Lewis Carroll's Through the Looking Glass, collaborators from the University of Illinois and National University of Singapore improved a 35-year-old ecology model to better understand how species ...

User comments : 3

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

Avitar
1 / 5 (2) Aug 06, 2009
That natural selection evelolution is not fast enough to produce the biosphere as we see it. Regional contenent size calamities like super volcanow are required every hundred millinum or so to explain the speed of evelution.
Ronan
4 / 5 (1) Aug 06, 2009
Avitar, what are you talking about? I don't understand what you're trying to say or what you're basing it on.

At any rate...This has some somewhat disturbing implications for today, particularly when one thinks of the plight of amphibians in general. Hopefully, amphibia is a large enough group, with enough diversity, that this wouldn't easily apply to them, but...size and diversity didn't save the dinosaurs or the non-crocodilian crurotarsans, so...
Ethelred
not rated yet Aug 07, 2009
Its not a matter of calamities but change of any kind that accelerates evolution. If the environment is stable there simply isn't much to force change.

Supervolnoes are not the only things that can cause the change. Splitting and joining plates. Changes in the Sun's output. Major impacts such as the one at Chixiulub. however the right way to spell it. The Deccan and Siberian Traps, which may have been induced by impacts. Yellowstone looks to have pretty nasty.

Key developments in organisms have clearly had major effects on all organisms. Even those that didn't have the developments.

Sexual reproduction, specialized cells, Eyesight, exoskeltons, endoskeltons, lungs, wings, DNA replacing RNA for information storage, hemoglobin, blood, vast numbers of things and all allowed rapid changes in the species that developed them and thus changed the environment of the species that had to deal with them or go extinct as many did.

Ethelred