No crystal ball necessary: New tool IDs predictable economic variables

Jul 21, 2009

You don't need a crystal ball to tell you what is going to happen next in the economy. You need a statistical model. A new method from North Carolina State University can help researchers determine which economic variables they should focus on by identifying whether a variable can be predicted.

The new method could be a breakthrough for economists and statisticians, says Dr. Mehmet Caner, an associate professor of economics at NC State and co-author of the paper unveiling the new research. "This could lead to much great insight into the national and global economy by providing the impetus to develop new forecasting models for those variables that can be predicted," he says.

Currently, economists and statisticians use tools called "unit root tests" to determine whether an economic variable - such as unemployment - can be predicted. "The issue," Caner says, "is that unit root tests often say variables are unpredictable when they actually can be predicted.

"I think our method will show that many variables believed to be unpredictable are actually predictable," Caner says, "including currency exchange rates and gross domestic product."

Caner worked with Dr. Keith Knight, of the University of Toronto, to develop an entirely new method using new models to better differentiate between predictable and unpredictable economic variables.

The idea stemmed in part from the use of Bridge estimator models in medical research to identify sections of genetic code that may be related to disease. Caner and Knight saw that similar techniques could be used to determine which economic variables within an economic system might be predictable.

Caner will present the new research, "No Country for Old Unit Root Tests: Bridge Estimators Differentiate between Nonstationary versus Stationary Models and Select Optimal Lag," at the European Economic Association and Econometric Society European meeting being held in Barcelona, Spain, from Aug. 23-27.

Source: North Carolina State University (news : web)

Explore further: Rural loss and ruin can be avoided

add to favorites email to friend print save as pdf

Related Stories

New model predicts hot spots for mercury in fish

Dec 01, 2008

Mercury levels in fish are prompting widespread consumption advisories and uncertainty among consumers over which species are safe to eat. Now researchers at North Carolina State University have developed a model that will ...

It's a gamble: Econophysicists meld science, economics

Nov 30, 2006

Predicting financial markets is more of a gamble than traditional economists will admit, and making sense of such numbers is more like trying to decipher noise blasting from a loudspeaker, says one University of Houston econophysicist, ...

Why conservation efforts often fail

Sep 18, 2007

Modern conservation techniques have brought us the resurgence of American bald eagles, sustainable forest harvests and the rescue of prized lobster fisheries. So how can modern conservation strategies also have wrought such ...

How Will the Economy Fare in 2007?

Jan 17, 2007

North Carolina State professor Dr. Michael Walden is an economist and not an airplane pilot, but he uses aviation terminology to discuss the prospects for the U.S. economy in the next 12 months.

Recommended for you

Shrinking dinosaurs evolved into flying birds (w/ Video)

11 minutes ago

A new study involving scientists from the University of Southampton has revealed how massive, meat-eating, ground-dwelling dinosaurs evolved into agile flying birds: they just kept shrinking and shrinking, ...

Congressional rift over environment influences public

3 hours ago

American citizens are increasingly divided over the issue of environmental protection and seem to be taking their cue primarily from Congress, finds new research led by a Michigan State University scholar.

Rural loss and ruin can be avoided

6 hours ago

An Australian Reconstruction Development Board needs to be established to help avoid more needless forcing of Australian farmers from their land, a QUT economist has said.

User comments : 4

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

Icester
not rated yet Jul 21, 2009
Well, at least they should have plenty of data to test their theories on. It should be interesting if they can model the current economic crisis. Maybe once and for all the Democrat vs Repub philosophies can be tested.
Velanarris
5 / 5 (1) Jul 21, 2009
Well, at least they should have plenty of data to test their theories on. It should be interesting if they can model the current economic crisis. Maybe once and for all the Democrat vs Repub philosophies can be tested.

Neither philosophy is correct in its entirety, but there are some things we all know to be false.

For example, the GOP is wrong when they've said, "War is good for the economy." Conversely, the DNP is wrong when they say you "Have to spend your way out of debt".


There's only one right answer, vote em all out of office unless they do something that is entirely for the people, and not just for the people who fund their campaign.
PaulLove
5 / 5 (1) Jul 21, 2009
The primary problem is they support their party over their nation they aren't looking to make the situatin better they just aim to help out their campaign contributors

I pledge allegiance to the party and to the chicanery for which it stands, one nation under our thumb with prosperity and justice for none
defunctdiety
not rated yet Jul 21, 2009
Economics is one of those things, like AI or climate and/or weather, I don't think we're going to be able to accurately and reliably model them until we have quantum computers. There's too many variables within variables within variables.

It's always bothered me when people refer to economics as a science anyway. There's general ideas and reasonable principles but I don't think there's any immutable laws, like physics. It's still just a freaking giant ongoing experiment, much like the various civilizations.