'Invisibility cloak' could protect against earthquakes

Jul 20, 2009
'Invisibility cloak' could protect against earthquakes
The 'invisibility cloak' could be applied to buildings by installing rings into foundations

(PhysOrg.com) -- Research at the University of Liverpool has shown it is possible to develop an 'invisibility cloak' to protect buildings from earthquakes.

The seismic waves produced by earthquakes include body waves which travel through the earth and surface waves which travel across it. The new technology controls the path of surface waves which are the most damaging and responsible for much of the destruction which follows earthquakes.

The technology involves the use of concentric rings of plastic which could be fitted to the Earth's surface to divert surface waves. By controlling the stiffness and elasticity of the rings, waves travelling through the 'cloak' pass smoothly into the material and are compressed into small fluctuations in pressure and density. The path of the surface waves can be made into an arc that directs the waves outside the protective cloak. The technique could be applied to buildings by installing the rings into foundations.

Sebastien Guenneau, from the University's Department of Mathematics, who developed the technology with Stefan Enoch and Mohamed Farhat from the Fresnel Institute (CNRS) in Marseilles, France, explained: "We are able to 'tune' the cloak to the differing frequencies of incoming waves which means we can divert waves of a variety of frequencies. For each small frequency range, there is a pair of rings which does most of the work and these move about a lot - bending up and down - when they are hit by a wave at their frequency.

"The waves are then directed outside the cloak where they return to their previous size. The cloak does not reflect waves - they continue to travel behind it with the same intensity. At this stage, therefore, we can only transfer the risk from one area to another, rather than eliminate it completely."

He added: "This work has enormous potential in offering protection for densely populated areas of the world at risk from earthquakes. The challenge now is to turn our theories into real applications that can save lives - small scale experiments are underway."

Seismic waves also include coupled pressure and shear body waves which are less destructive than surface waves. Sebastien Guenneau and Sasha Movchan at the University of Liverpool, together with Michele Brun at Cagliari University, have designed an 'elastic' cloak to protect against these particularseismic waves and the team is currently seeking a suitable material to accommodate the elastic parameters of the cloak.

The new research to protect against earthquakes is published in Applied Physics Letters and Physical Review Letters.

Source: University of Liverpool (news : web)

Explore further: Cooling with molecules

add to favorites email to friend print save as pdf

Related Stories

Tsunami Invisibility Cloak

Sep 26, 2008

Rather than building stronger ocean-based structures to withstand tsunamis, it might be easier to simply make the structures disappear.

Researchers develop 2-D invisibility cloak

Dec 18, 2007

Harry Potter may not have talked much about plasmonics in J. K. Rowling's fantasy series, but University of Maryland researchers are using this emerging technology to develop an invisibility cloak that exists beyond the world ...

Small waves can produce monster waves

Aug 10, 2006

Normal waves can unexpectedly turn into waves the size of a ten-story building. What’s more, these monster waves arise many times more rapidly than was previously thought. This has been shown by researchers at Umea University ...

Recommended for you

Cooling with molecules

8 hours ago

An international team of scientists have become the first ever researchers to successfully reach temperatures below minus 272.15 degrees Celsius – only just above absolute zero – using magnetic molecules. ...

Backpack physics: Smaller hikers carry heavier loads

Oct 21, 2014

Hikers are generally advised that the weight of the packs they carry should correspond to their own size, with smaller individuals carrying lighter loads. Although petite backpackers might appreciate the ...

User comments : 7

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

SincerelyTwo
5 / 5 (1) Jul 20, 2009
Could this be applied to spacecraft to protect against all harmful radiation? etc?

It would be amazing if we no longer had to use materials to absorb radiation but instead re-direct it all away entirely.
nkalanaga
not rated yet Jul 20, 2009
Would that qualify as a "deflector shield"?
Fazer
5 / 5 (1) Jul 20, 2009
Could this be applied to spacecraft to protect against all harmful radiation?


I am sure something like you say will eventually be developed, but for now, these cloaking schemes, both the ones for use with EM radiation, and this newer theoretical design for use with mechanical waves, are only suited for specific wavelengths.

The possible uses are endless. How about thermal blankets? Or structures built into electronics that cause heat to flow only along desired pathways?

After reading this article, I am wondering when the first lawsuit will be filed against a landlord using this technology for causing a "wave anomaly" to appear on his neighbor's land, utterly destroying everything on that plot beacuse the cloak inadvertantly concentrated the waves in that direction.
PinkElephant
not rated yet Jul 20, 2009
After reading this article, I am wondering when the first lawsuit will be filed against a landlord using this technology for causing a "wave anomaly" to appear on his neighbor's land, utterly destroying everything on that plot beacuse the cloak inadvertantly concentrated the waves in that direction.


My thoughts exactly.

As for,

...are only suited for specific wavelengths.


That's the problem with the notion of shielding against cosmic radiation. These kinds of "invisibility cloaks" work only for long-wave radiation that is indeed best modeled as a wave. Short-wave radiation (like gamma rays, for example) is better modeled as particles, not to mention actual particles like cosmic rays. These things can't be practically deflected, as they travel too fast and huge energies are required to push them aside over such short distances; they also come from all directions, so no dipole-like field arrangement would be effective; unfortunately they can only be absorbed.
ArtflDgr
not rated yet Jul 20, 2009
there is a better way for earthquake waves on the surface that is less complex and serves the purpose better.
nkalanaga
not rated yet Jul 20, 2009
Sure - build earthquake proof buildings. But there comes a point where the cost of protecting the building from a large quake is prohibitive.

One way to improve earthquake resistance would be to do away with vertical walls. A truncated pyramid can't easily fall, as the weight of the walls holds it together, and if the roof is on top of the walls, it can't fall into the building. But even that design would fail in a large enough quake.
ArtflDgr
not rated yet Jul 26, 2009
no.. what i mean is that in a wave that does damage the slopes are long and steep... but if you break those waves up, something that can be done much easier than some invisability cloak, then you get a lot of vibration instead of huge slopes. the point here is that its much easier to build for a lot of vibration but hard to build for a lot of sheer. the average energy is the same, but since its distributed and smaller than the size of the building, it becomes a lot of rumble. such structures can easily be built as empty columns or you can dual use them by filling them with water, and have radiant arms so that waves that hit them also get dispersed in other directions.

a small down was hit hard by a tiny earthquake because the wave came in on the open size of a crescent valley.