Physicists find way to control individual bits in quantum computers

Jul 07, 2009
Optical lattices use lasers to separate rubidium atoms (red) for use as information "bits" in neutral-atom quantum processors -- prototype devices which designers are trying to develop into full-fledged quantum computers. NIST scientists have managed to isolate and control pairs of the rubidium atoms with polarized light, an advance that may bring quantum computing a step closer to reality. Credit: NIST

Physicists at the National Institute of Standards and Technology have overcome a hurdle in quantum computer development, having devised a viable way to manipulate a single "bit" in a quantum processor without disturbing the information stored in its neighbors. The approach, which makes novel use of polarized light to create "effective" magnetic fields, could bring the long-sought computers a step closer to reality.

A great challenge in creating a working quantum computer is maintaining control over the carriers of information, the "switches" in a quantum processor while isolating them from the environment. These , or "qubits," have the uncanny ability to exist in both "on" and "off" positions simultaneously, giving quantum computers the power to solve problems conventional computers find intractable - such as breaking complex cryptographic codes.

One approach to quantum computer development aims to use a single isolated rubidium atom as a . Each such rubidium atom can take on any of eight different energy states, so the design goal is to choose two of these energy states to represent the on and off positions. Ideally, these two states should be completely insensitive to stray magnetic fields that can destroy the qubit's ability to be simultaneously on and off, ruining calculations. However, choosing such "field-insensitive" states also makes the qubits less sensitive to those magnetic fields used intentionally to select and manipulate them. "It's a bit of a catch-22," says NIST's Nathan Lundblad. "The more sensitive to individual control you make the qubits, the more difficult it becomes to make them work properly."

To solve the problem of using magnetic fields to control the individual atoms while keeping stray fields at bay, the NIST team used two pairs of energy states within the same atom. Each pair is best suited to a different task: One pair is used as a "memory" qubit for storing information, while the second "working" pair comprises a qubit to be used for computation. While each pair of states is field- insensitive, transitions between the memory and working states are sensitive, and amenable to field control. When a memory qubit needs to perform a computation, a can make it change hats. And it can do this without disturbing nearby memory qubits.

The NIST team demonstrated this approach in an array of atoms grouped into pairs, using the technique to address one member of each pair individually. Grouping the atoms into pairs, Lundblad says, allows the team to simplify the problem from selecting one qubit out of many to selecting one out of two - which, as they show in their paper, can be done by creating an effective magnetic field, not with electric current as is ordinarily done, but with a beam of polarized light. The polarized-light technique, which the NIST team developed, can be extended to select specific qubits out of a large group, making it useful for addressing individual qubits in a quantum processor without affecting those nearby. "If a working quantum computer is ever to be built," Lundblad says, "these problems need to be addressed, and we think we've made a good case for how to do it." But, he adds, the long-term challenge to remains: integrating all of the required ingredients into a single apparatus with many qubits.

More information: N. Lundblad, J.M. Obrecht, I.B. Spielman, and J.V. Porto. Field-sensitive addressing and control of field-insensitive neutral-atom qubits. Nature Physics, July 5, 2009.

Source: National Institute of Standards and Technology (news : web)

Explore further: New experiment provides route to macroscopic high-mass superpositions

add to favorites email to friend print save as pdf

Related Stories

NIST Demonstrates Better Memory with Quantum Computer Bits

Aug 10, 2005

Physicists at the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) have used charged atoms (ions) to demonstrate a quantum physics version of computer memory lasting longer than 10 seconds—more than 100,000 times longer ...

Next step to the quantum computer

Oct 06, 2004

Physicists at the University of Bonn build quantum data memory Physicists from the University of Bonn have succeeded in taking a decisive step forward towards processing quantum information with neutral atoms: in the la ...

2 qubits in action, new step towards the quantum computer

Jun 14, 2007

Researchers at Delft University of Technology have succeeded in carrying out calculations with two quantum bits, the building blocks of a possible future quantum computer. The Delft researchers are publishing ...

A Quantum CPU: the Pentium Q?

May 23, 2006

A new design scheme for a quantum processor core makes potential quantum computers more technically feasible, more efficient, and in many cases faster by keeping all of the quantum bits active all the time, rather than switching ...

Recommended for you

Quantum holograms as atomic scale memory keepsake

Oct 21, 2014

Russian scientists have developed a theoretical model of quantum memory for light, adapting the concept of a hologram to a quantum system. These findings from Anton Vetlugin and Ivan Sokolov from St. Petersburg ...

1980s aircraft helps quantum technology take flight

Oct 20, 2014

What does a 1980s experimental aircraft have to do with state-of-the art quantum technology? Lots, as shown by new research from the Quantum Control Laboratory at the University of Sydney, and published in Nature Physics today. ...

User comments : 3

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

finitesolutions
1 / 5 (2) Jul 07, 2009
Even with current technologies topping my bank account is technically a very easy to solve problem. If the quantum computer will solve this I will take it. Otherwise it is useless to me.
Traveler
not rated yet Jul 08, 2009
Quantum computing is pure crackpottery, on a par with the flat earth hypothesis. Don't let physicists pull a wool over your eyes and treat you like an idiot.

http://rebelscien...ery.html
Traveler
not rated yet Jul 08, 2009
"If a working quantum computer is ever to be built," Lundblad says...

Woah! Hold on a Planck second. Doesn't this mean that all the previous announcements to the effect that researchers have already built working quantum computers with various numbers of qbits, were a bunch of BS?

Yep. That's exactly what they were, BS. I smell crackpottery and fraud every time quantum computing is mentioned. NIST should be ashamed of themselves, for the way they spend the taxpayer's money on silly crackpottery. Where is the congressional oversight on this nonsense?

Isn't it about time that this so-called science that never shows anything solid (it's always around the corner and in need of more funding) gets fingered for what it is? Where are the critics of QC? Are they all scared by the peer review system? I think so.