What goes down, must come up: Geoscientists offer new model for degassing of Earth's mantle

May 27, 2009

A new analysis of the processes that constantly stir the Earth's deep mantle is helping to explain how the mantle holds onto a portion of ancient noble gases that were trapped during the Earth's formation.

The research, which appears this week in the journal Nature, takes aim at a question that has vexed geoscientists for years: how to reconcile leading theories about the convection of Earth's with observations of ancient noble gases in . Researchers at Rice University and Harvard University developed a new model to explain how noble gases -- elements like helium, neon and argon -- are lost from the Earth's interior during mantle convection.

"Most existing models find that convection should have left the mantle extensively depleted in ancient noble gases, unless part or all of the lower mantle has been somehow isolated," said study co-author Helge Gonnermann, assistant professor of Earth science at Rice. "We set out to see if there was a mechanism that could both preserve ancient noble gases in the lower mantle and still be consistent with the existing framework for whole mantle convection."

On human timescales, the Earth's surface seems to change very little. But geoscientists know the planet's topmost layer, or lithosphere, is actually a series of interlocking tectonic plates that are in constant motion. When plates collide, mountain ranges form, and when they pull apart, as happens deep beneath the oceans, new crust forms by partial melting of the uppermost mantle. Plates also slide one beneath another in a process known as subduction, and seismologists discovered about 15 years ago that some subducted plates plunge deep into the Earth. In some cases, they even sink across the mantle transition zone, a layer about 660 kilometers deep that divides the Earth's upper and lower mantle.

"This was a real problem because the prevailing view in geoscience was that only the was involved in this plate tectonic recycling process," Gonnermann said. "One reason people believed this was because there appear to be relatively high concentrations of ancient noble gases in ocean island basalts, volcanic rocks found at volcanic island chains, such as Hawaii."

One of these ancient noble gases is helium-3, an isotope of that isn't created by any process inside the Earth. Consequently, scientists know that virtually all the helium-3 found on Earth is left over from the planet's formation. Helium-3 tends to get released from the mantle when it rises to form new crust. As the mantle cycles, from mantle to ocean crust and back to mantle again, geochemists expect to see less and less helium-3. While this is what's observed in most basalt rocks formed from lavas erupting at mid-ocean ridges, there are exceptions, particularly in basalt rocks from Hawaii and other volcanic ocean island chains.

Ocean island chains are thought to form when mantle plumes rise from the lowermost mantle to the Earth's surface, where the mantle undergoes partial melting to produce basalt magma.

"The presence of ancient noble gases in these basalts implies that they have remained locked inside the lower mantle since the Earth formed about 4.5 billion years ago," Gonnermann said. "In contrast, most of these ancient noble gases appear to have leaked out of the upper mantle, because the plate tectonic recycling process allows noble gases to escape with the basalt magma as it continuously forms new ocean crust at mid-ocean ridges."

In the new study, Gonnermann and longtime collaborator Sujoy Mukhopadhyay, a Harvard geochemist, developed a model that could reconcile convection involving the lower mantle with the helium-3 measurements found in ocean island basalts.

The model suggests that both the upper and lower mantle are involved in convection, but it affects them in different ways. Whereas the upper mantle has been extensively degassed through repeated tectonic cycling, the lower mantle has been recycling approximately once during the past 4.5 billion years.

Continuous mixing of subducted plates into the lower mantle has been diluting the concentrations of ancient noble gases there. Instead of extracting ancient noble gases at their original concentrations, progressively smaller amounts are extracted at any given rate of tectonic cycling. Consequently, about 40 percent of the ancient helium-3 can still be present in the lower mantle, even though it may have undergone one complete tectonic cycling over the past 4.5 billion years.

"Contrary to the conventional view that tectonic cycling of the lower mantle should result in extensive mixing between the lower and upper mantle, thereby erasing any differences in helium-3, we find that much of the tectonic cycling of the lower mantle essentially bypasses the upper mantle," Mukhopadhyay said. "What goes down must come up: Slabs that subduct and mix into the lower mantle are balanced by mantle plumes, rich in helium-3, which rise from the lower mantle to the Earth's surface without mixing significantly as they traverse the upper mantle."

Source: Rice University (news : web)

Explore further: Mystery solved: 'Sailing stones' of death valley seen in action for the first time

add to favorites email to friend print save as pdf

Related Stories

Lava provides window on early Earth

Nov 02, 2007

Researchers at Harvard and the University of Hawaii believe they’ve resolved a long-standing controversy over the roots of islands — volcanoes in the middle of tectonic plates — showing that the islands’ ...

Helium-3 - all is not lost

Sep 03, 2005

Is there a reservoir of primordial rock deep within the Earth, left over from the birth of our planet? Geochemical data have traditionally indicated 'yes', but evidence from seismology seemed inconsistent with the survival ...

Scientists reveal fate of Earth's oceans

May 10, 2006

Scientists at The University of Manchester have uncovered the first evidence of seawater deep inside the Earth shedding new light on the fate of the planet's oceans, according to research published in Nature this week (May 1 ...

Liverpool scientist discovers new layer of the Earth

Apr 14, 2005

A University of Liverpool scientist has discovered a new layer near the Earth's core, which will enable the internal temperature of the Earth's mantle to be measured at a much deeper level than previously possible.

Recommended for you

User comments : 4

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

2.3 / 5 (6) May 27, 2009

Earth's upper mantle differentiated to form the crust, oceans and atmosphere, but many parts of Earth's deep interior are still primitive.

Our investigation of Earth's noble gases confirmed the 1969 suggestion by Turekian and Clarke [Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 6 (1969) 346-348] that Earth accreted in layers, beginning with the formation of its iron core from iron meteorites that were initially dominant in the region close to the Sun ["The noble gas record of the terrestrial planets," Geochemical Journal 15 (1981) 247-267.

With kind regards,
Oliver K. Manuel
not rated yet May 27, 2009
Very interesting web site and observations. I'm particularly appreciative that you have your papers online in pdf format.

Thank you sir!
4 / 5 (2) May 27, 2009
Um, if I've read it correctly, one of OKM's website claims is that our Sun formed by accretion onto a pulsar neutron star. IIRC, that's a recipe for serious cosmic fireworks, even collapse to black holes.

Another claim does not seem to have been updated since solar neutrinos were found to be switching flavours, resolving the 'missing' numbers.

He could be right about the offset solar centre, there's still enough unknown about the magnetic multipoles. I don't know enough astrophysics to take issue with his many other claims...

Your mileage may vary.
1 / 5 (4) May 31, 2009

Um, if I've read it correctly, one of OKM's website claims is that our Sun formed by accretion onto a pulsar neutron star.

You are right, Nik.

Gravitational interactions of this dense, energetic solar core with orbiting planets produce solar cycles and changes in our climate.

Our climate and the center-of-mass of the solar system are always changing.

With kind regards,
Oliver K. Manuel