Research Examines Factors That Influence Intention to Pirate Digital Media; People Do Because They Can

May 11, 2009

(PhysOrg.com) -- A study by information systems researchers at the University of Arkansas shows that as many as three out of four college students may be illegally copying and downloading digital material, including copyright-protected music, movies and software.

The finding confirms nationwide data that most students have pirated digital material. However, while the percentage is dramatic, the number of students pirating now is likely decreasing, the researchers said, as entertainment companies and universities implement more advanced and comprehensive prevention technologies.

The researchers found that people pirate digital media because they possess the ability and resources to do so, and because it is easy to copy and download copyrighted music and movies. Furthermore, the study revealed that once an individual participates in piracy, the intention to repeat the illegal behavior increases.

“Past piracy behavior and perceived behavioral control were strong predictors of intent to pirate,” said Paul Cronan, professor of information systems and lead author of “Factors that Influence the Intention to Pirate Software and Media,” which was published in the Journal of Business Ethics. “Results from the questionnaires led us to conclude that subjects who had the ability and resources to pirate digital media had a higher intention toward piracy, and that more occurrences and experiences with piracy tended to increase intentions toward more of the same behavior.”

To better understand why digital piracy occurs and what influences an individual’s intent to illegally copy and download copyrighted material, Cronan and Sulaiman Al-Rafee, assistant professor of information systems at the University of Kuwait, sampled 280 students - 164 male students and 116 female students - from a business college at a university in the Midwest. Through questionnaires, the researchers asked the students to comment on their behavior and beliefs about piracy. The questions were related to various hypotheses about six factors, identified in previous research, that influence the intention to pirate digital material: intention, attitude, subjective norms, perceived behavioral control, past piracy behavior and moral obligation.

More than three fourths - 76.5 percent - of the students had pirated material. Almost a third - 30.6 percent - of these students reported participating in a “large amount” of digital piracy, and half of this population said they pirated a “small amount.” There were significant differences between male and female students. Of all students who had pirated, 65.1 percent were men; 34.9 percent were women.

As for factors that influence the decision to illegally copy and download material, the researchers found that past piracy behavior - defined as the frequency of occurrence of digital piracy in the past - had the greatest effect on the intent to pirate. Subjects who had previously pirated had a higher intention to pirate in the future, especially as the frequency of piracy increased.

As Cronan mentioned above, perceived behavioral control - a measure of how easy or difficult it is for a subject to perform the behavior in question - also had a significantly positive effect on intent. More than eight out of 10 subjects - 84.3 percent, specifically - reported that it was easy or very easy to pirate digital media, and only 0.3 percent found it “hard” or “very hard” to pirate. Perhaps not surprisingly, the results revealed a strong connection between those who had the ability and resources to pirate and the intention to do so.

Forty-four percent of the subjects indicated a favorable attitude toward digital piracy. Less than a fourth - 23.6 percent - had a less favorable attitude, and 32.5 percent were neutral. This means that more than three-fourths of the thought illegal copying and downloading of copyrighted material was OK or had no opinion about it. Not surprisingly, the researchers found that those who had a more favorable attitude toward piracy had a higher intention to pirate.

Moral obligation - an individual’s feeling of guilt or personal obligation to perform or not perform a behavior - was also a significant predictor of intention. Subjects who felt more guilt or moral obligation toward digital piracy had a lower intention to pirate. Subjective norms - an individual’s perception of social pressure to perform or not perform the behavior - was not a significant predictor of intent to pirate.

“As expected, there was a positive relationship between subjective norm and intention,” Cronan said. “But it was not significant. We could not conclude that subjects’ intentions regarding digital piracy were positively affected by the approval of others.”

Recording and film companies have reported significant financial loss due to piracy. According to the Recording Industry Association of America, there was a decline of 31 percent in music sales from 1999 to 2002 due to illegal copying and downloading of copyrighted material. The Motion Picture Association of America estimates that the industry worldwide lost about $18.2 billion in 2005 because of piracy.

Provided by University of Arkansas (news : web)

Explore further: Precarious work schedules common among younger workers

add to favorites email to friend print save as pdf

Related Stories

'Digital piracy' may benefit companies

Mar 17, 2008

Unauthorised copying of software, music or films, so-called digital piracy, may have benefits for the affected companies, an Oxford researcher has claimed.

It’s not just a game, dude

Mar 06, 2006

The video game industry lost more than $1.8 billion to global piracy through illegal copying, counterfeiting, and distributing in 2004. In latest issue of IBM Systems Journal researchers present two novel approaches for game ...

Trouble for iTunes in France?

Mar 15, 2006

France hopes consumers will use legal software to covert digital content into other formats by forcing companies including Apple to comply via revised digital copyright law.

An-arrgh-chy! What Blackbeard can teach us about politics

Feb 21, 2008

Pirates, like gangsters, highwayman, and other colorful outlaws, have always carried a certain romantic appeal with them upon the high seas. Thanks to a certain movie trilogy, they are the most appealing of the outlaws at ...

Recommended for you

Precarious work schedules common among younger workers

19 hours ago

One wish many workers may have this Labor Day is for more control and predictability of their work schedules. A new report finds that unpredictability is widespread in many workers' schedules—one reason ...

Girls got game

20 hours ago

Debi Taylor has worked in everything from construction development to IT, and is well and truly socialised into male-dominated workplaces. So when she found herself the only female in her game development ...

Computer games give a boost to English

Aug 28, 2014

If you want to make a mark in the world of computer games you had better have a good English vocabulary. It has now also been scientifically proven that someone who is good at computer games has a larger ...

Saddam Hussein—a sincere dictator?

Aug 28, 2014

Are political speeches manipulative and strategic? They could be – when politicians say one thing in public, and privately believe something else, political scientists say. Saddam Hussein's legacy of recording private discussions ...

User comments : 4

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

dirk_bruere
not rated yet May 11, 2009
Only 3/4 pirate stuff? Clearly 25% of students are slackers or too technologically illiterate to do so. How does the arts/science divide show up?
feliponz
not rated yet May 11, 2009
Did they separate the pirated "stuff" into categories? It would be interesting to see what are the attitudes towards music compared to videogames, or work tools like photoshop and 3D software. Surely, downloading music would be viewed a bit differently by people than downloading a way more expensive piece of software?
frajo
2.3 / 5 (3) May 15, 2009
This "Journal of Business Ethics" does not study the morality of Big Business, only the morality of its victims.
The decline in musical sales could be influenced by several factors, not just by using modern technologies. Why don't they take this possibility into account?
And they don't take into account the amorality of striking poor people with immense fines that are in no sound relation to the "damage" done.
And they didn't study what percentage of people would have bought at all a regular CD or DVD if there wasn't the internet.

This study is completely biased in favour of Big Business. This is not science - it's religion.
odebi
not rated yet May 31, 2009
I agree with frajo : this is not science.

The only data recorded by Cronan are :
- attitude (good/bad pleasant/unpleasant ...)
- subjective norms
- perceived behavior control
- past piracy behavior
- moral obligation

And _nothing_ about other factors : need, price, purchasing power, availability...

Moreover, it is really startling to read things like: "According to the Recording Industry Association of America (RIAA), there was a decline of 31% in music sales from 1999 to 2002, which was primarily a result of piracy (Feuilherade, 2004)." or : "The Motion Picture Association of American (MPAA) estimates that around 400,000%u2013600,000 movies are being copied/downloaded on the Internet everyday (Report MPAA, 2003). The MPAA also estimates that the
worldwide motion picture industry had lost about
$18.2 billion dollars in 2005 as the result of piracy
(http://www.mpaa.o...s.asp." in a 'scientific' study.

There is no cloud I can't extract a straight line from with that kind of methodology...

Same propaganda on the University of arkansas website :"Recording and film companies have reported significant financial loss due to piracy. According to the Recording Industry Association of America, there was a decline of 31 percent in music sales from 1999 to 2002 due to illegal copying and downloading of copyrighted material. The Motion Picture Association of America estimates that the industry worldwide lost about $18.2 billion in 2005 because of piracy."

http://dailyheadl...5041.htm