Judge in Pirate Bay trial may have been biased

Apr 23, 2009
Supporters of the web site 'The Pirate Bay', one of the world's top illegal filesharing websites, demonstrate in Stockholm, on April 18, 2009. A Swedish judge who found four men guilty of promoting copyright infringement by running filesharing site The Pirate Bay may have been biased and a retrial may be ordered, legal experts said Thursday.

A Swedish judge who found four men guilty of promoting copyright infringement by running filesharing site The Pirate Bay may have been biased and a retrial may be ordered, legal experts said Thursday.

"The trial may have to be redone. But in such case the lawyers have to request this immediately," one of Sweden's most high-profile defence lawyers, Leif Silbersky, told public broadcaster Swedish Radio.

His comments came after the radio station revealed one of the judges in the case, Tomas Norstroem, belongs to several copyright protection associations where film and record industry officials are also members.

On April 17, Stockholm's district court sentenced Fredrik Neij, Gottfrid Svartholm, Peter Sunde and Carl Lundstroem each to a year in jail and ordered them to pay damages of 30 million kronor (2.72 million euros, 3.56 million dollars) to the movie and recording industry.

The four vowed to appeal the verdict.

Sunde's defence lawyer, Peter Althin, said Thursday he would demand a retrial.

"In my appeal I'm going to argue that (the was biased). The court of appeal can then decide whether the district court's verdict should be thrown out and the case retried," Althin said.

Norstroem is a member of the Swedish Copyright Association, as are Monique Wadsted, who represented the film and recording industry in the trial, and the head of the Swedish Anti-Piracy Agency, Henrik Ponten.

The judge also sits on the board of the Swedish Association for the Protection of Industrial Property.

Yet Norstroem insisted that he was not biased.

"I do not consider myself biased because of these affiliations," he said.

Eric Bylander, a lecturer in litigation law at Gothenburg's business school, said the judge's opinion mattered little.

"It can look bad, regardless of what the judge thinks. In a high-profile case like this, it surprises me that they weren't more cautious," he said.

A lay judge was removed from the case before the trial because of his own possible conflict of interest as a member of a composers' association.

Founded in 2003, The makes it possible to skirt copyright fees and share music, film and computer game files using bit torrent technology, or peer-to-peer links offered on the site.

None of the material can be found on The Pirate Bay server itself.

The Pirate Bay claims to have some 22 million users worldwide.

(c) 2009 AFP

Explore further: Twitpic to stay alive with new owner

add to favorites email to friend print save as pdf

Related Stories

Sweden: hundreds protest Pirate Bay conviction

Apr 19, 2009

(AP) -- Wearing bandanas and waving Jolly Roger flags, hundreds of supporters of file-sharing hub The Pirate Bay demonstrated on Saturday against a Swedish court's conviction of the Internet site's organizers.

Hollywood scores win over Pirate Bay, 4 convicted

Apr 17, 2009

(AP) -- The entertainment industry won round one Friday in a legal battle against file-sharing hub The Pirate Bay, with guilty verdicts and one-year prison sentences handed down to four men accused of running ...

Court Denies Vonage Bid for Patent Case Retrial

May 04, 2007

A U.S. appeals court denies a request by Internet phone company Vonage Holdings that it order a retrial in the patent infringement case brought against it by Verizon Communications.

Recommended for you

Facebook dressed down over 'real names' policy

Sep 17, 2014

Facebook says it temporarily restored hundreds of deleted profiles of self-described drag queens and others, but declined to change a policy requiring account holders to use their real names rather than drag names such as ...

User comments : 2

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

ExtraMedium
5 / 5 (1) Apr 23, 2009
Every judge who's ever made a ruling in any trial in the entirety of history may have been biased. The question is whether or not he should have been legally allowed to decide in this case because of his other affiliations.
Egnite
not rated yet Apr 24, 2009
Maybe it's time for the Defense to be allowed to run background checks on the ruling judge...