Adolescents with unpopular names more prone to committing crime

Jan 28, 2009

A new study in the journal Social Science Quarterly examined the relationship between first name popularity in adolescents and tendency to commit crime. Results show that, regardless of race, juveniles with unpopular names are more likely to engage in criminal activity.

David E. Kalist and Daniel Y. Lee of Shippensburg University analyzed state data by comparing the first names of male juvenile delinquents to the first names of male juveniles in the population.

Researchers constructed a popularity-name index (PNI) for each name. For example, the PNI for Michael is 100, the most frequently given name during the period. The PNI for David is 50, a name given half as frequently as Michael. The PNI is approximately 1 for names such as Alec, Ernest, Ivan, Kareem, and Malcolm.

The least popular names were associated with juvenile delinquency among both blacks and whites. While the names are likely not the cause of crime, they are connected to factors that increase the tendency to commit crime, such as a disadvantaged home environment, residence in a county with low socioeconomic status, and households run by one parent.

Also, adolescents with unpopular names may be more prone to crime because they are treated differently by their peers, making it more difficult for them to form relationships. Juveniles with unpopular names may also act out because they consciously or unconsciously dislike their names.

Source: Wiley

Explore further: Nimoy inspired generations of sci-fi fans

add to favorites email to friend print save as pdf

Related Stories

Should the Internet have an 'off' switch?

Feb 21, 2011

A raging debate over new legislation, and its influence on the Internet, has tongues wagging and fingers pointing from Silicon Valley to Washington, D.C.

The Athenians: Another warning from history?

Oct 05, 2009

(PhysOrg.com) -- The collapse of Greek democracy 2,400 years ago occurred in circumstances so similar to our own it could be read as a dark and often ignored lesson from the past, a new study suggests. ...

Recommended for you

Bribery 'hits 1.6 billion people a year'

Feb 27, 2015

A total of 1.6 billion people worldwide – nearly a quarter of the global population – are forced to pay bribes to gain access to everyday public services, according to a new book by academics at the Universities of Birmingham ...

How music listening programmes can be easily fooled

Feb 26, 2015

For well over two decades, researchers have sought to build music listening software that can address the deluge of music growing faster than our Spotify-spoilt appetites. From software that can tell you ...

User comments : 4

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

Mauricio
5 / 5 (2) Jan 28, 2009
What about Barack? or Arnold? or Lance? or Bertrand? or Noam?

Stupid research seems to me... but who knows, I might be wrong.

I would think that poverty and single mother homes are better predictors of adolescent crime.
zevkirsh
not rated yet Jan 29, 2009
DUMB , once again proving that social science , is not 'science'
DGBEACH
not rated yet Jan 29, 2009
SO they're saying that Adolf Hitler's mother was to blame (she was Jewish, right?) ? LMAO
noosfractal
not rated yet Jun 06, 2009
Mauricio invalidates their multi-million dollar study in 3 sentences.

Who gave this Kalist guy money? How do we ensure that it doesn't happen again?

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more

Click here to reset your password.
Sign in to get notified via email when new comments are made.