Ethanol profitability calculator developed by Iowa State University researcher

Jan 14, 2009

( -- A researcher at Iowa State University has developed a tool to determine what market conditions are needed for ethanol producers to make a profit.

David Peters, an assistant professor of sociology in Iowa State's College of Agriculture and Life Sciences, has been getting questions about the profitability of ethanol plants under current market conditions and decided to create a spreadsheet that would allow anyone to figure it out for themselves.

"I've developed a model that inputs all the costs," he said. "Then it indexes it to corn prices and ethanol prices to determine profitability."

In creating the tool, he considered that there is conflicting information about ethanol.

"Different groups have different perspectives," he said. "But when you sit down and do the numbers, I wanted this to be a neutral, third-party view."

Peters expects this calculator will be useful for several different groups.

"This is a tool for local communities, investors, policy makers and anyone else who wants to better understand how these ethanol plants are doing," said Peters.

"Of course investors are very interested in calculating profitability," he said. "But communities that have plants, or are considering plants, also want to know if they'll make money. The communities invest a lot in local infrastructure and want to know if the plant will be profitable."

According to Peters' model, near-term price conditions -- corn cost, approximately $4; ethanol price, approximately $1.75 -- a typical ethanol plant that has capital debt is losing 17 to 23 cents on every gallon produced. For a plant producing 100 million gallons each year, that is an annual operating loss of $16 to $23 million. Unless the plant has cash reserves to weather this storm, they could be in trouble, says Peters.

In the past few years, when ethanol prices were high and corn low, many plants made enough money to retire their debt early. These plants with no capital debt are now roughly breaking even or losing a few cents on every gallon, according to Peters.

Peters predicts that the current market may lead to some consolidation among ethanol producers as they try to remain profitable.

"No one has a crystal ball to see the future, but this can give people an idea of where prices have to be," he said. "For example, if corn is at $4.25, then ethanol would have to be at $2.00 for plants with debt to break even -- and $1.85 if they have no debt."

Peters' calculator allows anyone to input their own costs or prices to estimate what the costs of corn and ethanol would have to be for a company to be profitable.

Peters says there are other considerations that he could not include in his calculations.

"Ethanol is important for clean air and that wasn't really figured into the model," he said. "Health costs and a cleaner environment are important, so from a public policy perspective, it's important."

Peters' model can be found at .

Provided by Iowa State University of Science and Technology

Explore further: Freedom and responsibility of science

add to favorites email to friend print save as pdf

Related Stories

Mesquite a complementary biofuel feedstock

Aug 04, 2014

As requirements grow for use of cellulosic biofuels to meet the energy needs of the nation, researchers look at potential feedstocks and any effects these alternative sources may have on greenhouse gas emissions.

Cover crops make stover more sustainable, profitable

Aug 04, 2014

Farmers using cover crops as a soil conservation method can remove much more corn stover per acre for biofuels or other uses and at the same time potentially increase their income, Purdue University research shows.

Harvesting the power of big data in agriculture

Jun 12, 2014

Connecting with old friends? There's an app for that. Logging your fitness goals? There's an app for that. Making your farm more sustainable? There, too, is an app for that. In our technology-driven world, farmers, scientists ...

Recommended for you

Freedom and responsibility of science

4 hours ago

Yesterday, the German Research Foundation (DFG) and the Leopoldina National Academy of Sciences presented their recommendations for "The Freedom and Responsibility of Science" in Berlin. Both research organizations appeal ...

What I learned from debating science with trolls

Aug 20, 2014

I often like to discuss science online and I'm also rather partial to topics that promote lively discussion, such as climate change, crime statistics and (perhaps surprisingly) the big bang. This inevitably ...

Activists urge EU to scrap science advisor job

Aug 19, 2014

Nine major charities urged the European Commission on Tuesday to scrap a science advisor position it says puts too much power over sensitive policy into the hands of one person.

More to a skilled ear in music

Aug 15, 2014

The first pilot study in Australia to give musicians the skills and training to critically assess music by what they hear rather than what they see begins this month at the Sydney Conservatorium of Music.The study aims to ...

User comments : 3

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

not rated yet Jan 14, 2009
"an assistant professor of sociology"???

You know THIS guy has a heavy math background...
not rated yet Jan 14, 2009
This actually isn't hard to do, by any means. It's a very simple spreadsheet, and only looks "impressive" because there are so many scenarios. What would make more sense is to let the user specify the costs: a bushel of corn, the water rate, electricity rate (varies alot through the US), as well as natural gas. Reading his assumptions, users should also be able to input trucking costs (he assumed that corn was 15 miles away, maybe in Iowa but not many other places; the price of diesel is important here). Anyways when I read "calculator" I figured you specify some costs and it comes up with the break-even price of ethanol, this is just a bunch of scenarios (corn & ethanol) with fixed costs that are not representative of all plants (but may fit most of Iowa nicely).
not rated yet Apr 16, 2009
The history of ethanol as a "green" alternative should give us pause. What was suppose to be an easy answer has become quite complex with big variations in cost from state to state (due to the cost of water for growing corn) and due to the competition for corn (animal feed, etc.)

We are all too quick to jump on new technology without understanding the implications. I have very serious concerns about the rate at which government is pushing us toward huge investments in unproven technology as answers to questions that have not been fully analyzed. Yes, there are environmental consequences of using fossil fuels, but there are environmental consequences to just about everything... e.g. having children and feeding the poor.

On top of that, every environmental changes in history was clearly NOT caused by humanity. Changes of these types WILL happen again, in spite of what WE do. What we need is flexibility in dealing with environmental changes and drop the blame game as to how "we (or more often "they") are responsible.

It is amazing that we can blithely accept as "beyond our control" the financial collapse of the last 6 months... a TOTALLY human created event, with all inputs and outputs fully documented... and still THINK we have some idea about how to weigh the trade offs between the various sources of energy we use.

That is human ego "gone wild"!