Star Light, Star Bright, Its Explanation is Out of Sight

Jan 06, 2009
This pair of NASA Hubble Space Telescope pictures shows the appearance of a mysterious burst of light that was detected on February 21, 2006, brightened over 100 days, and then faded into oblivion after another 100 days. The source of the outburst remains unidentified. The event was detected serendipitously in a Hubble search for supernovae in a distant cluster of galaxies. The light-signature of this event does not match the behavior of a supernova or any previously observed astronomical transient phenomenon in the universe. Astronomers do not know the object's distance, so it can either be in our Milky Way galaxy or at a great astronomical distance. The optical spectrum of the object contains absorption features that have not yet been identified. This may represent a previously undetected class of transient phenomenon in the universe. Credit: NASA, ESA, and K. Barbary (University of California, Berkeley/Lawrence Berkeley National Lab, Supernova Cosmology Project)

(PhysOrg.com) -- A mysterious flash of light from somewhere near or far in the universe is still keeping astronomers in the dark long after it was first detected by NASA's Hubble Space Telescope in 2006. It might represent an entirely new class of stellar phenomena that has previously gone undetected in the universe, say researchers.

Astronomers commonly observe intense flashes of light from a variety of stellar explosions and outbursts, such as novae and supernovae. Hubble discovered the cosmic flash on February 21, 2006. It steadily rose in brightness for 100 days, and then dimmed back to oblivion after another 100 days.

The rise and fall in brightness has a signature that simply has never been recorded for any other type of celestial event. Supernovae peak after no more than 70 days, and gravitational lensing events are much shorter. Therefore, this observation defies a simple explanation, reports Kyle Barbary of the Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory (LBNL) in Berkeley, Calif. He is describing the bizarre Hubble observation at the 213th meeting of the American Astronomical Society in Long Beach, Calif. "We have never seen anything like it," he concludes.

The spectral fingerprints of light coming from the object, cataloged as SCP 06F6, also have eluded identification as being due to any specific element. One guess is that the features are redshifted molecular carbon absorption lines in a star roughly one billion light-years away.

But searches through various astronomical survey catalogs for the source of the light have not uncovered any evidence for a star or galaxy at the location of the flash. The Supernova Cosmology Project at LBNL discovered it serendipitously in a search for supernovae.

Hubble was aimed at a cluster of galaxies 8 billion light-years away in the spring constellation Bootes. But the mystery object could be anywhere in between, even in the halo of our own Milky Way galaxy.

Papers published by other researchers since the event was reported in June 2006, have suggested a bizarre zoo of possibilities: the core collapse and explosion of a carbon rich star, a collision between a white dwarf and an asteroid, or the collision of a white dwarf with a black hole.

But Barbary does not believe that any model offered so far fully explains the observations. "I don't think we really know what the discovery means until we can observe similar objects in the future."

All-sky surveys for variable phenomena, such as those to be conducted with the planned Large Synoptic Survey Telescope, may ultimately find similar transient events in the universe.

Provided by Hubble Centre

Explore further: Quest for extraterrestrial life not over, experts say

add to favorites email to friend print save as pdf

Related Stories

Sakurai's Object: Stellar evolution in real time

Apr 02, 2014

(Phys.org) —Stellar lifetimes are measured in billions of years, so changes in their appearance rarely take place on a human timescale. Thus an opportunity to observe a star passing from one stage of life ...

'Smart' racket offers tennis revolution

Mar 17, 2014

Aluminium and graphite swept away the wooden racket that Bjorn Borg used to win 11 Grand Slam titles, but smart rackets that analyse power and spin promise a new tennis revolution.

Rocks around the clock: asteroids pound tiny star

Feb 19, 2014

(Phys.org) —Scientists using CSIRO's Parkes telescope and another telescope in South Africa have found evidence that a tiny star called PSR J0738-4042 is being pounded by asteroids—large lumps of rock ...

Recommended for you

Quest for extraterrestrial life not over, experts say

Apr 18, 2014

The discovery of an Earth-sized planet in the "habitable" zone of a distant star, though exciting, is still a long way from pointing to the existence of extraterrestrial life, experts said Friday. ...

Continents may be a key feature of Super-Earths

Apr 18, 2014

Huge Earth-like planets that have both continents and oceans may be better at harboring extraterrestrial life than those that are water-only worlds. A new study gives hope for the possibility that many super-Earth ...

Exoplanets soon to gleam in the eye of NESSI

Apr 18, 2014

(Phys.org) —The New Mexico Exoplanet Spectroscopic Survey Instrument (NESSI) will soon get its first "taste" of exoplanets, helping astronomers decipher their chemical composition. Exoplanets are planets ...

User comments : 11

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

itistoday
5 / 5 (2) Jan 06, 2009
Too long to be a shot from an Aurorian battle cruiser too... shucks!
superhuman
3 / 5 (4) Jan 06, 2009
Supernovae peak after no more than 70 days, and gravitational lensing events are much shorter.


While the majority of lensing events can be short rare longer ones are certainly possible, after all the duration only depends on the relative velocities of objects. The steady rise and fall of brightness seems to support lensing, first the object moves into focus then out of it, finally the irregular shape at the photo also can be seen as supporting this.
nkalanaga
3.7 / 5 (3) Jan 06, 2009
Lensing seems more likely than an alien weapon, but how about an alien spaceship's drive? On a slightly curved course, a constant acceleration drive could show this signature. Such a course would be consistent with an interplanetary orbit.

I don't seriously believe this, and agree that lensing is the most likely (known) coause, but aliens can't be ruled out.
Mauricio
5 / 5 (1) Jan 06, 2009
It is going to take a long long long time for the "skeptical" to accept alien civilizations. Skeptical is becoming synonymous with rigid.
NeilFarbstein
3 / 5 (2) Jan 07, 2009
An alien ship manned by white dwarves? Not likely.
Possibly LGM.
Thecis
1 / 5 (1) Jan 07, 2009
I also agree that aliens couldn't be ruled out. But if that is a mere "search light", I would not likely want to see the hand that is holding this "mere" flashlight...
Lensing could be. Superhuman said that lensing could be longer because of the velocities of the galaxies. I don't really agree. The angle needed to focus the star in our telescopes is very sensitive. Any deviation due to speed (our own and that of the lensing galaxy and the one we see behind that one) will have a huge effect on the way wee see it. So I tend to agree with the article that Lensing couldn't be it (but to be honest, I can't rule it out completely either).
We also have to keep in mind that collissions could be an answer. After all, the universe is so immensly fast, what we have seen is smaller than what we haven't seen. I think this is indeed a not yet recorded event that we will see more often in the future (yes, also when this is alien life that enjoys blowing up suns for example. Once you have done the first I can imagine you want to do another).
mysticfree
5 / 5 (1) Jan 07, 2009
Probably just a Death Star that exploded and then burned. Long live the rebellion!
superhuman
2.3 / 5 (3) Jan 07, 2009
Superhuman said that lensing could be longer because of the velocities of the galaxies. I don't really agree. The angle needed to focus the star in our telescopes is very sensitive.


My point is that longer lensing is certainly possible and shouldn't be outright dismissed based on the fact that we only registered short lensing events so far. Nothing prevents longer events from taking place, they are only less probable.

The better synchronized the velocities of 2 objects on the opposite sides of the lensing mass the longer the event. Yes, the focus is very sensitive but there are also countless stars and galaxies to choose from so there does not seem to be an easy way to estimate how common it might be.

We would need to have such an estimate - probability of lensing events as a function of their duration to say something more definitive but I suspect we haven't observed the Universe long enough to determine it though I might be wrong on this. (It might also be possible to model this function based on mass distribution in the Universe but it would still have to be confirmed experimentally)
Thecis
1 / 5 (1) Jan 08, 2009
Good point. I have to agree with you.
smiffy
5 / 5 (1) Jan 08, 2009
I'm mystified as to how any gravitational lensing effect is any shape other than a ring, or part ring like a crescent moon.

Also I can't see how there is such an increase in the amount of light between the before and after photos if it's down to gravitational lensing, which can, after all, only enlarge the image, not increase the quantity of light.

I suppose that if there were a dust cloud that masked the light completely and then the lens moved into position so that it refracted all the light around the cloud, you could get an increase in light. Seems an extremely unlikely arrangement though.
Thecis
1 / 5 (2) Jan 13, 2009
When you are in exactly the right spot, gravitational lensing will give a perfect image without any other images (on the other hand, if you take a small enough fraction of a ring, it would appear as a dot).

I think you are right to say that lensing could not (in that extend) increase the light. It would have to be some other phenomenon (but it could be made visible by lensing and all the moving objects etc...)

But even as something is extremely unlikely, but will happen very often in such a large galaxy. The fact that it is probably the first time we have seen it, contributes to the fact that is unlikely.

More news stories

NASA's MMS observatories stacked for testing

(Phys.org) —Engineers at NASA's Goddard Space Flight Center in Greenbelt, Md., accomplished another first. Using a large overhead crane, they mated two Magnetospheric Multiscale, or MMS, observatories – ...

ISEE-3 comes to visit Earth

(Phys.org) —It launched in 1978. It was the first satellite to study the constant flow of solar wind streaming toward Earth from a stable orbit point between our planet and the sun known as the Lagrangian ...

Easter morning delivery for space station

Space station astronauts got a special Easter treat: a cargo ship full of supplies. The shipment arrived Sunday morning via the SpaceX company's Dragon cargo capsule.

Atom probe assisted dating of oldest piece of earth

(Phys.org) —It's a scientific axiom: big claims require extra-solid evidence. So there were skeptics in 2001 when University of Wisconsin-Madison geoscience professor John Valley dated an ancient crystal ...