Ericsson Predicts Mobile Phones With Full HD, 1 GHz Processor Frequency By 2012

Nov 08, 2008 by Mary Anne Simpson weblog
Ericsson Predicts Mobile Phones With Full HD and 1 GHz Transmission Speeds By 2012
Ericsson Predicts Mobile Phones With Full HD and 1 GHz Transmission Speeds By 2012. Image: Nikkei Electonics

(PhysOrg.com) -- Mobile phones of the future will be equipped with a 12 MP to 20 MP cameras with full HD capability by 2012, according to Jonas Lundstedt, Director of Ericsson's Portfolio Management, Product and Portfolio Management.

New technologies aptly named HSPA Evolution and LTE which means long term evolution will increase the transmission speeds initially to 100Mbps and make possible the progression to full HD quality images. Ericsson plans to actively develop embedded modules, base station facilities and other products in order to bring about the future mobile terminal hand-held device, according to reporter Hiroki Yomogita published on November 6 by Nikkei Electronics.

Currently, HSPA technology has a maximum transmission speed of 7.2Mbps. Ericsson´s system has the lion´s share of commercial networks utilizing HSPA compatible terminals. Today, 805 kinds of HSPA-compatible terminals have been released from approximately 129 manufacturers. According to Hakan Eriksson, Chief Technology Officer at Ericsson, LTE will significantly enhanced the mobile broadband experience for users, who will be able to enjoy more performance-demanding applications like interactive TV, advanced games or professional services. It is expected that 1.8 billion people will have broadband by 2012 and of this amount 2/3 will be mobile broadband subscribers.

Wireless technology will be the predominant way of accessing broadband and Internet connectivity in homes, offices, schools and businesses. Initially, the developing world and other countries will rely primarily on HSPA. LTE is expected to pick up quickly relying on its relationship with the current GSM/WCDMA/HSPA technology family. Another key benefit of LTE is its performance and capacity. Ericsson has already demonstrated peak rates of 160Mbits/s. The future will deliver speeds 300Mbits/s and higher.

The LTE Radio Access Network round trip times will be 10ms or less. Thus, LTE is a prime candidate for the 4G network because it meets all the requirements. Another advantage of LTE is its operator deployment flexibility. It supports flexible carrier bandwidth from 1.4MHz to 20MHz. It also supports both FDD and TDD. The advantage is that an operator may introduce LTE in new bands to where it is easiest for 10 MHz or 20 MHz carriers and eventually switch exclusively to LTE.

According to Mr. Eriksson, the strong market pull for HSPA is creating a burgeoning mobile bandwidth eco-system of device makers, network makers, application developers and enterprises. Since LTE supports hand-over and roaming to existing mobile networks, all devices will have ubiquitous mobile broadband coverage from day one. Ericsson plans to be at the head of the pack for a total transformation of mobile communications. Their vision is a terminal display with XGA resolution and the operating frequency of the application processor will reach 1GHz. It is expected the Japanese market which is moving fast in HSPA will be first to deploy the HSPA Evolution and LTE technology.

Explore further: FINsix small-size laptop adapter uses special power platform

add to favorites email to friend print save as pdf

Related Stories

Advanced radio technologies for fairer 4G communications

Mar 04, 2013

If you live in one of the dozen or so European countries with an up and running 4Gmobile network, you may have already bought a 4G-enabled phone, hoping to enjoy the blisteringly fast data rates your operator ...

Review: Samsung's Galaxy Nexus a sweet smartphone

Dec 15, 2011

As fans of Google's Android mobile software well know, each new version is named after a sugary treat, such as Gingerbread or Honeycomb. Android is about to get even sweeter with Ice Cream Sandwich - a smooth, ...

Whose 4G is fastest? AT&T, Sprint or Verizon

Mar 28, 2011

Just because you slap a shiny label on something doesn't make it so. All the major wireless carriers are now touting faster 4G networks, but the networks themselves are far from identical.

Recommended for you

Sony's PlayStation 4 sales top seven million

2 hours ago

Sony says it has sold seven million PlayStation 4 worldwide since its launch last year and admitted it can't make them fast enough, in a welcome change of fortune for the Japanese consumer electronics giant.

Study: Samsung phone durable, but iPhone has edge

Apr 14, 2014

Samsung's new Galaxy S5 smartphone is more durable than last year's model and other leading Android phones, but the iPhone 5s outperformed all of them in part because of its smaller size, a new study finds.

Invention loves collaboration at Milan show

Apr 14, 2014

Collaboration drove invention during Milan's annual International Furniture Show and collateral design week events, yielding the promise of homes without mobile phone chargers, and with more ergonomic seating, ...

User comments : 6

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

tkjtkj
4.5 / 5 (2) Nov 08, 2008
The photo does show a
future cellphone 'cpu speed' of
1 Ghz, but i dont see any ref
to any 'transmission speed' of
that value.

bar
5 / 5 (2) Nov 08, 2008
tkjtkj, you are right to notice the CPU speed. Transmission rates are given in (x)bits/second, where x can be k (for kilo), M (for mega), etc.

The article does mention demonstrated 160 Mbits/sec, which is equivalent to amazing (for the current state of technology) 8 bits/second/Hz if they used 20 MHz channel.

I wouldn't even bother to speculate what channel bandwidth would be used for 1 Gbit/sec, as I assume that whoever wrote the article didn't know much about the subject and mixed the CPU speed with the data rate.
bar
5 / 5 (2) Nov 08, 2008
Plus, I just noticed the data rate of 100 Mbits/sec on that picture above.
zbarlici
5 / 5 (1) Nov 08, 2008
I hava a 55 inch 1080P tv. The manual says that in order to see any difference between the 720p and the 1080p resolutions i must sit not further than eight feet from the screen... i wonder how close you` have to be to your little three-inch PDA to see the difference between 720p and 1080p
earls
2 / 5 (1) Nov 08, 2008
2012, sheesh, talk about pessimists.
la7dfa
5 / 5 (1) Nov 16, 2008
Until someone comes up with better lenses, I see no point in high resolution cameras on cell phones.
My SE C-902 with 5 Megapixels stinks big time compared with any regular compact camera.

More news stories

Sony's PlayStation 4 sales top seven million

Sony says it has sold seven million PlayStation 4 worldwide since its launch last year and admitted it can't make them fast enough, in a welcome change of fortune for the Japanese consumer electronics giant.

Robotics goes micro-scale

(Phys.org) —The development of light-driven 'micro-robots' that can autonomously investigate and manipulate the nano-scale environment in a microscope comes a step closer, thanks to new research from the ...

Biologists help solve fungi mysteries

(Phys.org) —A new genetic analysis revealing the previously unknown biodiversity and distribution of thousands of fungi in North America might also reveal a previously underappreciated contributor to climate ...