Ecologists use oceanographic data to predict future climate change

Nov 06, 2008

Earth scientists are attempting to predict the future impacts of climate change by reconstructing the past behavior of Arctic climate and ocean circulation. In a November special issue of the journal Ecology, a group of scientists report that if current patterns of change in the Arctic and North Atlantic Oceans continue, alterations of ocean circulation could occur on a global scale, with potentially dramatic implications for the world's climate and biosphere.

Charles Greene of Cornell University and his colleagues reconstructed the patterns of climate change in the Arctic from the Paleocene epoch to the present. Over these 65 million years, the Earth has undergone several major warming and cooling episodes, which were largely mitigated by the expansion and contraction of sea ice in the Arctic.

"When the Arctic cools and ice sheets and sea ice expand, the increased ice cover increases albedo, or reflectance of the sun's rays by the ice," says Greene, the lead author on the paper. "When more of the sun is reflected rather than absorbed, this leads to global cooling."

Likewise, when ice sheets and sea ice contract and expose the darker-colored land or ocean underneath, heat is absorbed, accelerating climate warming. Currently, the Earth is in the midst of an interglacial period, characterized by retracted ice sheets and warmer temperatures.

In the past three decades, changes in Arctic climate and ice cover have led to several reorganizations of northern ocean circulation patterns. Since 1989, a species of plankton native to the Pacific Ocean has been colonizing the North Atlantic Ocean, a feat that hasn't occurred in more than 800 thousand years. These plankton were carried across the Arctic Ocean by Pacific waters that made their way to the North Atlantic.

"When Arctic climate changes, waters in the Arctic can go from storing large quantities of freshwater to exporting that freshwater to the North Atlantic in large pulses, referred to as great salinity anomalies," Greene explains. "These GSAs flow southward, disrupting the ocean's circulation patterns and altering the temperature stratification observed in marine ecosystems."

In the continental shelf waters of the Northwest Atlantic, the arrival of a GSA during the early 1990s led to a major ecosystem reorganization, or regime shift. Some ocean ecosystems in the Northwest Atlantic saw major drops in salinity, increased stratification, an explosion of some marine invertebrate populations and a collapse of cod stocks.

"The changes in shelf ecosystems between the 1980s and 1990s were remarkable," says Greene. "Now we have a much better idea about the role climate had in this regime shift."

The changes observed in recent decades are only the tip of the iceberg. Previous interglacial periods have ended when the global ocean's deep circulation slowed in response to reductions in the formation of North Atlantic Deep Water, or NADW, a large, deep mass of highly saline water in the North Atlantic. At these tipping points in the Earth's history, NADW formation was disrupted by pulses of freshwater entering the North Atlantic. The slowing of the global ocean's deep circulation results in less heat being transported to higher latitudes, accelerating ice formation and advancing the Earth into glacial conditions.

Recent modeling studies show that NADW formation will likely be resilient to freshwater pulses from the Arctic during the 21st century, according to the authors. Continued exposure to such freshwater forcing, however, could disrupt global ocean circulation during the next century and lead to very abrupt changes in climate, similar to those that occurred at the onset of the last ice age.

"If the Earth's deep ocean circulation were to be shut down, many of the atmospheric, glacial and oceanic processes that have been stable in recent times would change, and the change would likely be abrupt," says Greene. "While the ecosystem consequences of gradual changes in the ocean are somewhat predictable, all bets are off after such abrupt changes occur."

Source: Ecological Society of America

Explore further: Climate change increases risk of crop slowdown in next 20 years

add to favorites email to friend print save as pdf

Related Stories

Corals provide clues for climate change research

Jul 16, 2014

(Phys.org) —Just as growth rings can offer insight into climate changes occurring during the lifespan of a tree, corals have much to tell about changes in the ocean. At Caltech, climate scientists Jess ...

2013 New Zealand's warmest winter on record

Jul 18, 2014

The world continued to warm last year, according to the State of the Climate in 2013 report, with some Southern Hemisphere countries, including New Zealand, having one of their warmest years on record.

What geology has to say about global warming

Jul 14, 2014

Last month I gave a public lecture entitled, "When Maine was California," to an audience in a small town in Maine. It drew parallels between California, today, and Maine, 400 million years ago, when similar ...

Recommended for you

'Shocking' underground water loss in US drought

Jul 24, 2014

A major drought across the western United States has sapped underground water resources, posing a greater threat to the water supply than previously understood, scientists said Thursday.

User comments : 8

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

jeffsaunders
4.3 / 5 (3) Nov 06, 2008
Wasn't this story the basis of that movie that came out a few years ago? The one where U.S. froze solid overnight?
mikiwud
3.8 / 5 (4) Nov 07, 2008
65 million yeras ago, the continents were in a different configuration and thus the oceans and currents changed for other reasons than climate.
GrayMouser
3.7 / 5 (3) Nov 07, 2008
"When the Arctic cools and ice sheets and sea ice expand, the increased ice cover increases albedo, or reflectance of the sun's rays by the ice," says Greene, the lead author on the paper. "When more of the sun is reflected rather than absorbed, this leads to global cooling."

This is in opposition to http://www.physor...102.html

Gee, battling theories.
Velanarris
5 / 5 (2) Nov 08, 2008
Ocean circulation is caused by the warm and cold water conveyors. This is a known mechanism. This mechanism is driven by the energy absorbed warming the water.

Now that there is an abundance of energy being absorbed due to less albedo provided by the ice sheets and poles the water heat will rise leading to more evaporation and precipitation.

That precipitation comes from clouds, which have a higher albedo, thereby reducing the amount of sunlight reaching the water and reducing cloud cover and albedo.

It couldn't possibly be a cyclical equilibrium. Not a chance....
rubberman
1 / 5 (4) Nov 09, 2008
The human element couldn't possibly alter any natural cyclical equilibrium. Not a chance....
denijane
1 / 5 (2) Nov 10, 2008
I don't get the point of those articles. When you have a result, present it. But until you have it, just do your work. We all know those scenarios, why should we read them over and over again?

Those articles are the reason why people still doubt Global Climate Change. Because instead of data, they offer us speculations. And it's not like there's not enough data. But dear climate scientists are way to busy to speculate, they simply don't have the time to process the data.
http://tothefutur...spot.com
GrayMouser
5 / 5 (2) Nov 10, 2008
Now Ecologists want to be Climate Scientists! Follow the money...
Velanarris
5 / 5 (3) Nov 11, 2008
I don't get the point of those articles. When you have a result, present it. But until you have it, just do your work. We all know those scenarios, why should we read them over and over again?

Those articles are the reason why people still doubt Global Climate Change. Because instead of data, they offer us speculations. And it's not like there's not enough data. But dear climate scientists are way to busy to speculate, they simply don't have the time to process the data.
http://tothefutur...spot.com


No one doubts climate change. The climate changes, we all agree on that and that is where the "overwhelming concensus" ends. Some people believe it's going to be catastrophic, some think it will be fine, some think it's man made, most do not.

The "denialists" as we've been marked, believe it's within natural variability. That's it. That's all there is to the argument. Is it natural or not? The answer is: no one knows, our climate is too complex to be explained away by some simple models with assumed variables, our prior temp record is not reliable enough, and until we have a well measured history of climate the global warming/global cooling alarmism will not end.

It's been going on since we first started tracking climate back in the early 1900's and maybe a little before then as well.