Liquid Mirror Telescopes on the Moon

Oct 09, 2008
An artist's concept of a spinning liquid mirror telescope on the Moon. Credit: Univ. of British Columbia.

A team of internationally renowned astronomers and opticians may have found a way to make "unbelievably large" telescopes on the Moon.

"It's so simple," says Ermanno F. Borra, physics professor at the Optics Laboratory of Laval University in Quebec, Canada. "Isaac Newton knew that any liquid, if put into a shallow container and set spinning, naturally assumes a parabolic shape—the same shape needed by a telescope mirror to bring starlight to a focus. This could be the key to making a giant lunar observatory."

Borra, who has been studying liquid-mirror telescopes since 1992, and Simon P. "Pete" Worden, now director of NASA Ames Research Center, are members of a team taking the idea for a spin.

On Earth, a liquid mirror can be made quite smooth and perfect if it its container is kept exactly horizontal and rests on a low-vibration low-friction air bearing that is spun by a synchronous motor having one stable speed. "It doesn't need to spin very fast," says Borra. "The rim of a 4-meter–diameter mirror—the largest I've made in my lab—travels only 3 miles per hour, about the speed of a brisk walk. In the low gravity of the Moon, it would spin even slower."

Most liquid-mirror telescopes on Earth have used mercury. Mercury remains molten at room temperature, and it reflects about 75 percent of incoming light, almost as good as silver. The biggest liquid-mirror telescope on Earth, the Large Zenith Telescope operated by the University of British Columbia in Canada, is 6 meters across—a diameter 20 percent larger than the famous 200-inch mirror of the Hale telescope at Palomar Observatory in California. Yet when completed in 2005, the Canadian Palomar-class liquid-mirror telescope cost less than $1 million to build—only a few percent the cost of a solid-mirror telescope of the same diameter--and, for that matter, only a sixth of Palomar's original cost in 1948.

Those economics are making astronomers sit up and begin noodling out plans for a lunar observatory.

"Our study [with Borra] started when I was still an astronomy professor at the University of Arizona before I came to NASA in 2006," Worden recalls. "The real appeal of this approach is that we could get an unbelievably large telescope on the Moon."

Mercury is unworkable on the Moon: it's very dense and thus heavy to launch, it's very expensive, and it would evaporate quickly when exposed to the lunar vacuum. In recent years, however, Borra and his colleagues have been experimenting with a class of organic compounds known as ionic liquids. "Ionic liquids are basically molten salts," Borra explains. "Their evaporation rate is almost zero, so they would not vaporize in the lunar vacuum. They can also remain liquid at very low temperatures." He and his colleagues are now seeking to synthesize ionic liquids that remain molten even at liquid-nitrogen temperatures.

Much less dense than mercury, ionic liquids are only slightly denser than water. Although not highly reflective themselves, a spinning mirror of an ionic liquid can be coated with an ultrathin layer of silver just as if it were a solid mirror. Weirdest of all, the silver layer is so thin—only 50 to 100 nanometers—that it actually solidifies. In the vacuum of space, a liquid mirror coated with a thin solid layer of silver would neither evaporate nor tarnish.

A liquid mirror can't be tilted away from the horizontal because the fluid would pour out, destroying the mirror. But that does not mean a liquid mirror telescope cannot be pointed. Optical designers are now experimenting with ways of electromechanically warping secondary mirrors suspended above a liquid mirror—or even slightly warping the liquid mirror itself—to aim at angles away from the vertical. Similar techniques are used to point the great Arecibo radio telescope in Puerto Rico.

Furthermore, says Borra, "if the telescope is located anywhere other than exactly at the poles, with each rotation of Earth or Moon it would scan a circular strip of sky. And the rotational axis of the Moon wobbles with a period of 18.6 years; so over a period of 18.6 years, the telescope would actually look at a good-sized region of the sky."

Locating a major liquid-mirror telescope near the lunar poles is appealing. The telescope itself could reside near the bottom of a permanently shadowed crater where it would stay at cryogenic temperatures, desirable for the best infrared astronomy. Yet solar panels could be erected on nearby permanently illuminated mountain peaks to generate power to keep the mirror spinning.

The fact that a liquid-mirror telescope always looks straight up vastly simplifies its construction and reduces mass by eliminating heavy mounts, gearing, and pointing-control systems needed for a steerable telescope. "All you'd need is the liquid-mirror container, which might be an umbrella-like device that self-deploys, plus a nearly frictionless superconducting bearing and its drive motor," Borra says. Worden estimates that all the materials for an entire lunar telescope 20 meters across would be "only a few tons, which could be boosted to the Moon in a single Ares 5 mission in the 2020s." Future telescopes might have mirrors as large as 100 meters in diameter—larger than a football field.

"A mirror that large could peer back in time to when the universe was very young, only half a billion years old, when the first generation of stars and galaxies were forming," Borra exclaimed. "Potentially more exciting is pure serendipity: new things we might discover that we just don't expect."

Says Worden: "Putting a giant telescope on the Moon has always been an idea of science fiction, but it soon could become fact."

Source: by Trudy E. Bell, Science@NASA

Explore further: Sticky end for sex geckos sent into space by Russia

add to favorites email to friend print save as pdf

Related Stories

Would Earth look like a habitable planet from afar?

Jun 30, 2014

Even when a distant world has the trademarks of habitability—it's Earth-sized, it's in the zone around its star where liquid water is possible—finding signs of life is tricky. The telescope technology ...

Recommended for you

Caterpillar comet poses for pictures en route to Mars

17 hours ago

Now that's pure gorgeous. As Comet C/2013 A1 Siding Spring sidles towards its October 19th encounter with Mars, it's passing a trio of sumptuous deep sky objects near the south celestial pole this week. ...

Hoisting a telescope with helium

17 hours ago

Many a child has forgotten to hold tight to the string of a helium balloon only to have it escape and rise until it disappeared in the glare of the sun. Helium balloons want to rise, but launching a balloon ...

User comments : 14

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

thales
5 / 5 (4) Oct 09, 2008
Yes!! Those are some sweet ideas. This would be a phenomenal opportunity for a new spaceflight company. So the question is, which private company will be the first to do it? There could be a lot of profit to be made in selling the rights to use the telescope, the rights to the images, and in government or private grants. Not to mention ad sponsorship - what company wouldn't want to be associated with the first private enterprise on the Moon?
zevkirsh
1.4 / 5 (14) Oct 09, 2008
stock market is crashing , this is never going to get funding within 50 years. dumb idea to be thinking about when in fact, it wont ever happen.
dirk_bruere
4.3 / 5 (8) Oct 09, 2008
Tell that to the Chinese
Mercury_01
1 / 5 (6) Oct 09, 2008
This was my idea, and I also invented rollerblades and the internet.
Crossrip
4.9 / 5 (8) Oct 09, 2008
Dumb idea? Were the Hoover Dam and the Golden Gate Bridge dumb ideas. Times of economic depression are hard but they also inspire us to dream bigger.
SMMAssociates
5 / 5 (4) Oct 10, 2008
Seems to me that we probably should do this eventually, even if we can't do it right away. You never know what "pure science" will drop on the floor that's useful.

From a trickle-down standpoint (which is a dirty word for some), we may be better off to do it now rather than later....

Regards
Soylent
4.8 / 5 (4) Oct 10, 2008
stock market is crashing , this is never going to get funding within 50 years. dumb idea to be thinking about when in fact, it wont ever happen.


Oh, there's an enormous amount of money available. Investors have grown weary of wallstreet dishonesty, risky paper assets and arbitrarily changing rules(e.g. the shorting ban); I think infrastructure is going to be exactly the sort of thing that money will be plowed into.
Jayem
5 / 5 (4) Oct 10, 2008
Em...isn't this news a bit old...I remember reporting on this back in June (http://www.moonpo..._2007:).
John
Doug_Huffman
2.3 / 5 (3) Oct 10, 2008
High-tech trickle down is better than no-tech welfare trickle down because it is productive of other than more welfare recipients.
lengould100
2.3 / 5 (3) Oct 10, 2008
There there, that's a good little neo-con. Now off to bed.
thales
not rated yet Oct 10, 2008
Thanks len! So sleepy... hey, waaait a second. You were being sarcastic, weren't you! Aw, len, you're a character!
zevkirsh
1 / 5 (2) Oct 11, 2008
And the rotational axis of the Moon wobbles with a period of 18.6 years; so over a period of 18.6 years, the telescope would actually look at a good-sized region of the sky." ....retarded
Jayman
not rated yet Oct 13, 2008
What a great idea !! With a giant telescope on the moon, we'll be able to see the moon really up close. All we now need is to drop down a cable long enough. Hope planes don't fly into the hanging cable.
Oderfla
not rated yet Oct 20, 2008
lmfaoaidekw!!!!!