Robots Detect Behavioral Cues to Follow Humans

Aug 21, 2008 by Lisa Zyga feature
Robots Detect Behavioral Cues to Follow Humans
A follower robot follows a leader robot (with UC Davis logo). Using behavioral cues, the follower can make its mission more reliable and accurate. Image credit: Chueh, et al. ©2008 IEEE.

Robots can be ironic. Even though they might not have emotions of their own, they can still detect and respond to humans’ emotions. A recent study has shown that, by picking up on human emotional traits, as well as a variety of other conscious and unconscious behavioral cues, robots may be able to act more naturally and accurately with humans.

The researchers, from the University of California, Davis, have developed a system that allows follower robots to use behavioral cues from human leaders and other robots in order to track and follow them. The ability to follow will likely be essential as robots continue to work alongside people more and more, such as in office buildings, hospitals, and airports.

“As humans, we constantly incorporate other peoples' current actions as clues (cues) as to what they may do in the future,” Sanjay Joshi of the University of California, Davis, told PhysOrg.com. “For instance, we have a ‘sixth sense’ on the highway to know that a certain car will swerve into our lane soon, based on the driver's current driving patterns. Then, we may become more defensive in our own driving. In our work, we wanted to begin the process of allowing robots to use behavioral cues (of humans or other robots), to make the robot's mission more reliable and accurate. In social work environments populated by numerous people and robots, these types of cues should be abundant.”

In their robot-following system, the researchers integrated information provided by behavioral cues to improve the performance of robot followers along with other tracking methods, such as cameras. The system continuously estimates the future predicted position of the leader as it moves, and then directs the follower robot to the predicted position.

The researchers’ aim was to reduce the amount of instructions or technical expertise required from human leaders to robots. As the authors noted, robots may be accepted if they are helpful, but can easily be rejected if they are difficult to work with.

The researchers explained that behavioral cues that robots might use could include any action or signal that the leader exhibits that hints at a future action. These might be intended behaviors, such as pointing or waving. Other cues might be unconscious, such as behaviors that indicate stress or sadness, since they may indicate generally quick or slow movement patterns. Also, studies on human walking have shown that people unconsciously turn their head up to 25 degrees about 200 milliseconds before turning.

In experiments, the researchers tested how well a follower robot (Evolution Robotics’ Scorpion) could follow a leader robot (another Scorpion) as it zig-zagged and turned a corner of a hallway. Turning was the more difficult action to follow, since the leader robot escaped the sight of the follower robot. Without using behavioral cues, the follower robot would initiate a searching algorithm by turning and looking around. If the leader wasn’t too far away, the follower could detect it and continue following; otherwise, it would be lost and stop moving.

The addition of the behavioral-cue controller significantly helped the follower robot to keep track of the leader. By detecting the leader’s subtle behaviors, the follower could anticipate when the leader was about to turn and predict its future path. Even though it lost sight of the leader, it kept close enough to its path so that it could find the leader again after the “blind” turn.

Overall, the behavioral-cue model had advantages in cases where the leader robot made drastic turns that would otherwise leave the follower robot lost. But since other controllers also had advantages, the researchers suggest that a supervisory control system that coordinates multiple controllers could be useful. They also anticipate that a wide range of behavioral cues should lead to highly successful robot followers.

“In the future, we hope to explore relevant behavioral cues for other robot tasks in human-robot work environments, and work on the robotics and computer science tools needed to make effective use of those cues,” Joshi said.

More information: Chueh, Michael; Au Yeung, Yi Lin William; Lei, Kim-Pang Calvin; and Joshi, Sanjay S. “Following Controller for Autonomous Mobile Robots Using Behavioral Cues.” IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics, Vol. 55, No. 8, August 2008.

Copyright 2008 PhysOrg.com.
All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed in whole or part without the express written permission of PhysOrg.com.

Explore further: Robots lending a helping hand to build planes

add to favorites email to friend print save as pdf

Related Stories

Muscle-powered bio-bots walk on command (w/ Video)

Jun 30, 2014

(Phys.org) —A new generation of miniature biological robots is flexing its muscle. Engineers at the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign demonstrated a class of walking "bio-bots" powered by muscle ...

Touch to feel the virtual world (w/ Video)

Jul 02, 2013

Haptic technology, which simulates the sense of touch through tactile feedback mechanisms, has been described as "doing for the sense of touch what computer graphics does for vision." Haptics are already ...

Recommended for you

Robots lending a helping hand to build planes

21 hours ago

Trying to squeeze into small enclosed areas, carrying out highly repetitive tasks, retiring with back injuries even while your expertise is needed: these everyday realities of working in aviation construction ...

C2D2 fighting corrosion

Aug 22, 2014

Bridges become an infrastructure problem as they get older, as de-icing salt and carbon dioxide gradually destroy the reinforced concrete. A new robot can now check the condition of these structures, even ...

Meet the "swarmies"- robotics' answer to bugs

Aug 22, 2014

(Phys.org) —A small band of NASA engineers and interns is about to begin testing a group of robots and related software that will show whether it's possible for autonomous machines to scurry about an alien ...

Hitchhiking robot reaches journey's end in Canada

Aug 21, 2014

A chatty robot with an LED-lit smiley face sent hitchhiking across Canada this summer as part of a social experiment reached its final destination Thursday after several thousand kilometers on the road.

User comments : 4

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

smiffy
2 / 5 (1) Aug 22, 2008
Why not have the leader robot simply indicate which way it's going to turn? As even people in cars do.
NOM
4 / 5 (1) Aug 28, 2008
Why not have the leader robot simply indicate which way it's going to turn? As even people in cars do.
That would help with robot to robot communication, but the article is discussing combinations of humans and robots.
wrapper
not rated yet Sep 04, 2008
Why not have the leader robot simply indicate which way it's going to turn? As even people in cars do.

This is about learning not receiving directions, the driver anticipates anothers movement, without signaling. And Behavioral Cues concept is outstanding.
smiffy
not rated yet Sep 19, 2008
Anthropization of robots is for toymakers.