The new shape of music: Music has its own geometry, researchers find

Apr 17, 2008
Geometrical Music Theory
The figure shows how geometrical music theory represents four-note chord-types -- the collections of notes form a tetrahedron, with the colors indicating the spacing between the individual notes in a sequence. In the blue spheres, the notes are clustered, in the warmer colors, they are farther apart. The red ball at the top of the pyramid is the diminished seventh chord, a popular 19th-century chord. Near it are all the most familiar chords of Western music. Credit: Dmitri Tymoczko, Princeton University

The connection between music and mathematics has fascinated scholars for centuries. More than 200 years ago Pythagoras reportedly discovered that pleasing musical intervals could be described using simple ratios.

And the so-called musica universalis or "music of the spheres" emerged in the Middle Ages as the philosophical idea that the proportions in the movements of the celestial bodies -- the sun, moon and planets -- could be viewed as a form of music, inaudible but perfectly harmonious.

Now, three music professors – Clifton Callender at Florida State University, Ian Quinn at Yale University and Dmitri Tymoczko at Princeton University -- have devised a new way of analyzing and categorizing music that takes advantage of the deep, complex mathematics they see enmeshed in its very fabric.

Writing in the April 18 issue of Science, the trio has outlined a method called "geometrical music theory" that translates the language of musical theory into that of contemporary geometry. They take sequences of notes, like chords, rhythms and scales, and categorize them so they can be grouped into "families." They have found a way to assign mathematical structure to these families, so they can then be represented by points in complex geometrical spaces, much the way "x" and "y" coordinates, in the simpler system of high school algebra, correspond to points on a two-dimensional plane.

Different types of categorization produce different geometrical spaces, and reflect the different ways in which musicians over the centuries have understood music. This achievement, they expect, will allow researchers to analyze and understand music in much deeper and more satisfying ways.

The work represents a significant departure from other attempts to quantify music, according to Rachel Wells Hall of the Department of Mathematics and Computer Science at St. Joseph's University in Philadelphia. In an accompanying essay, she writes that their effort, "stands out both for the breadth of its musical implications and the depth of its mathematical content."

The method, according to its authors, allows them to analyze and compare many kinds of Western (and perhaps some non-Western) music. (The method focuses on Western-style music because concepts like "chord" are not universal in all styles.) It also incorporates many past schemes by music theorists to render music into mathematical form.

"The music of the spheres isn't really a metaphor -- some musical spaces really are spheres," said Tymoczko, an assistant professor of music at Princeton. "The whole point of making these geometric spaces is that, at the end of the day, it helps you understand music better. Having a powerful set of tools for conceptualizing music allows you to do all sorts of things you hadn't done before."

Like what?

"You could create new kinds of musical instruments or new kinds of toys," he said. "You could create new kinds of visualization tools -- imagine going to a classical music concert where the music was being translated visually. We could change the way we educate musicians. There are lots of practical consequences that could follow from these ideas."

"But to me," Tymoczko added, "the most satisfying aspect of this research is that we can now see that there is a logical structure linking many, many different musical concepts. To some extent, we can represent the history of music as a long process of exploring different symmetries and different geometries."

Understanding music, the authors write, is a process of discarding information. For instance, suppose a musician plays middle "C" on a piano, followed by the note "E" above that and the note "G" above that. Musicians have many different terms to describe this sequence of events, such as "an ascending C major arpeggio," "a C major chord," or "a major chord." The authors provide a unified mathematical framework for relating these different descriptions of the same musical event.

The trio describes five different ways of categorizing collections of notes that are similar, but not identical. They refer to these musical resemblances as the "OPTIC symmetries," with each letter of the word "OPTIC" representing a different way of ignoring musical information -- for instance, what octave the notes are in, their order, or how many times each note is repeated. The authors show that five symmetries can be combined with each other to produce a cornucopia of different musical concepts, some of which are familiar and some of which are novel.

In this way, the musicians are able to reduce musical works to their mathematical essence.

Once notes are translated into numbers and then translated again into the language of geometry the result is a rich menagerie of geometrical spaces, each inhabited by a different species of geometrical object. After all the mathematics is done, three-note chords end up on a triangular donut while chord types perch on the surface of a cone.

The broad effort follows upon earlier work by Tymoczko in which he developed geometric models for selected musical objects.

The method could help answer whether there are new scales and chords that exist but have yet to be discovered.

"Have Western composers already discovered the essential and most important musical objects?" Tymoczko asked. "If so, then Western music is more than just an arbitrary set of conventions. It may be that the basic objects of Western music are fantastically special, in which case it would be quite difficult to find alternatives to broadly traditional methods of musical organization."

The tools for analysis also offer the exciting possibility of investigating the differences between musical styles.

"Our methods are not so great at distinguishing Aerosmith from the Rolling Stones," Tymoczko said. "But they might allow you to visualize some of the differences between John Lennon and Paul McCartney. And they certainly help you understand more deeply how classical music relates to rock or is different from atonal music."

Source: Princeton University

Explore further: Hyperbolic homogeneous polynomials, oh my!

add to favorites email to friend print save as pdf

Related Stories

Composer reveals musical chords' hidden geometry

Jul 06, 2006

Composers often speak of fitting chords and melodies together, as though sounds were physical objects with geometric shape -- and now a Princeton University musician has shown that advanced geometry actually does offer a ...

Recommended for you

Teachers' scare tactics may lead to lower exam scores

1 hour ago

As the school year winds down and final exams loom, teachers may want to avoid reminding students of the bad consequences of failing a test because doing so could lead to lower scores, according to new research published ...

Hyperbolic homogeneous polynomials, oh my!

2 hours ago

Cutting-edge mathematics today, at least to the uninitiated, often sounds as if it bears no relation to the arithmetic we all learned in grade school. What do topology and combinatorics and n-dimensional ...

Poll: Big Bang a big question for most Americans

8 hours ago

Few Americans question that smoking causes cancer. But they have more skepticism than confidence in global warming, the age of the Earth and evolution and have the most trouble believing a Big Bang created the universe 13.8 ...

User comments : 11

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

OregonWind
5 / 5 (3) Apr 17, 2008
This is fascinating. I wonder if that would start a new wave of frantic mathematics activities.
PeterdeBruin
5 / 5 (7) Apr 17, 2008
Please note that Pythagoras lived more than 2,500 years ago - which is significantly earlier than 200 years ago.
drknowledge
5 / 5 (7) Apr 17, 2008
PhysOrg, could you please be responsible for editing the sensational titles of articles that appear here? The article and the research itself are fine. But, as has happened a number of times recently, the title makes a "statement" which is both not what the article claims, and is misleading. It's been known for centuries that music has mathematical pinning, and that there are geometrical representations. Therefore the title indicating "researchers have discovered geometry in music" is, what's called in Wikipedia "peacock language". I.e., claims without substance. Don't degrade legitimate research by appending sensationalism in the form of titles of which the authors of the content would not approve.
Mercury_01
5 / 5 (1) Apr 17, 2008
I love this. As a DJ, I have often dreamed of converting music into a mathmatical set, and thn mathmatically changing that set to create music that hasnt been heard before. this could be used to make sounds and whole songs that follow geometrical morphology. It could be applied to a 3 dimentional effects processor that follows the position of your hands above the sensor board. someone tell KORG to make some minor software mods to thier product!
Tachyon8491
2.2 / 5 (10) Apr 17, 2008
As a composer of classical music but also with some decades of scientific training, the research witnessed in this article represents the worst of scientistic reductionism to me. "Music is so mathematical" such people say, and cannot begin to understand the underlying reality that music analogises in one of the most profound modelling languages that exists in revealing the mystical beauty of cosmic being. Listen to e.g. the d-minor Chaconne by J.S. Bach - then please, geometrise it - this approach equates to building a wire model of the Taj Mahal. The origin of musicality is psychodynamic and strongly relies on not just musicality and talent, but on a psychospiritual maturity which seems to become rarer as we evolve progressively towards materialistic technocracy...
Turbodog
3.2 / 5 (6) Apr 17, 2008
Much praise to Tachyon8491. As a retired professional guitarist, music is math, but math is not music. Music is the expression of life and personality that can be reduced to mathematical equations. However an equalition cannot symbolize life in the way a poetic verse does!
earls
5 / 5 (1) Apr 18, 2008
Is not writing notes of music the same as composing a formula to generate those notes?!
poopon
not rated yet Apr 20, 2008
Ah! Now if you had a picture of a song you could show it around and people could see that a new song is just really an old song with new words.
thales
not rated yet Apr 25, 2008
I wonder if a genetic algorithm could be used to evolve music. That would be pretty cool.
DeeSmith
not rated yet Apr 27, 2008
To follow up on Dr Knowledge's comment: Baroque composers employed a mathematical (geometry) basis of composition. Even the ancient Greek's musical notations are geometric in nature.

http://www.jhu.ed...ath.html
Mercury_01
not rated yet Apr 28, 2008
lets not confuse notes with how we interprit those notes. Were not trying to intalectualise music, just its patterns.

More news stories

Hyperbolic homogeneous polynomials, oh my!

Cutting-edge mathematics today, at least to the uninitiated, often sounds as if it bears no relation to the arithmetic we all learned in grade school. What do topology and combinatorics and n-dimensional ...

Teachers' scare tactics may lead to lower exam scores

As the school year winds down and final exams loom, teachers may want to avoid reminding students of the bad consequences of failing a test because doing so could lead to lower scores, according to new research published ...

Poll: Big Bang a big question for most Americans

Few Americans question that smoking causes cancer. But they have more skepticism than confidence in global warming, the age of the Earth and evolution and have the most trouble believing a Big Bang created the universe 13.8 ...