Research duo suggest possible explanation for rapid growth of seed black holes in early universe

Aug 08, 2014 by Bob Yirka report
This graphic shows the center of a newly formed star cluster (stars are in yellow), within which the seed black hole gets its super boost of gas (shown in blue).

(Phys.org) —A pair of researchers, Tal Alexander of the Weizmann Institute of Science, in Israel and Priyamvada Natarajan with Yale University in the U.S. has come up with a possible explanation for the rapid growth of black holes believed to have existed in the early universe. In their paper published in the journal Science, the two propose that early black holes could have grown much more rapidly than those observed today due to dense gases that existed at the time that allowed for rapid growth in the absence of an accretion disk.

Black holes are thought to exist at the center of most if not all galaxies—but contrary to popular science fiction, they don't simply suck in everything around them like a vacuum cleaner—if that were the case planet Earth would have been sucked into the black hole at the center of the Milky Way long ago. Materials are pulled into a black hole, but are slowed by the buildup of an accretion disk. That disk means that materials can only be pulled in along the plane of the disk. There is also the problem of materials colliding as they are pulled closer, generating enough energetic radiation to push other material away from the black hole. While this all makes sense in the modern era, it causes problems for space scientists seeking to figure out how everything got to where it is now—most theories point to super-massive black holes forming shortly after the Big Bang. But, how did they grow so big so fast?

Alexander and Natarajan think they may have the answer—they note that shortly after the Big Bang, the universe was of course, much smaller and denser. Cold dense gas, they suggest, in the vicinity of a black hole would not have been susceptible to causing heat creation due to collisions. But perhaps more importantly, the gravity pull from other nearby stars could have caused to move around in odd, erratic fashion, preventing the creation of an . That in turn would mean material could be pulled into the black hole from every direction, greatly increasing the speed at which it would build in mass.

A model the two built based on their ideas, suggests such a scenario could lead to a black hole starting with ten times the mass of our modern sun, growing to something ten billion times as big in just a billion years.

Explore further: Black hole that doesn't emit x-rays discovered near massive star

More information: Rapid growth of seed black holes in the early universe by supra-exponential accretion, Science DOI: 10.1126/science.1251053

ABSTRACT
Mass accretion by black holes (BHs) is typically capped at the Eddington rate, when radiation's push balances gravity's pull. However, even exponential growth at the Eddington-limited e-folding time tE ~ few×0.01 Gyr, is too slow to grow stellar-mass BH seeds into the supermassive luminous quasars that are observed when the universe is 1 Gyr old. We propose a dynamical mechanism that can trigger supra-exponential accretion in the early universe, when a BH seed is trapped in a star cluster fed by the ubiquitous dense cold gas flows. The high gas opacity traps the accretion radiation, while the low-mass BH's random motions suppress the formation of a slowly draining accretion disk. Supra-exponential growth can thus explain the puzzling emergence of supermassive BHs that power luminous quasars so soon after the Big Bang.

Press release

add to favorites email to friend print save as pdf

Related Stories

How much of the universe is black holes?

Jun 17, 2014

We all fear black holes, but how many of them are there out there, really? Between the stellar mass black holes and the supermassive ones, just how much of our Universe is black holes?

Recommended for you

Kepler proves it can still find planets

Dec 18, 2014

To paraphrase Mark Twain, the report of the Kepler spacecraft's death was greatly exaggerated. Despite a malfunction that ended its primary mission in May 2013, Kepler is still alive and working. The evidence ...

User comments : 4

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

Pexeso
1.6 / 5 (7) Aug 08, 2014
The localized accretion model has the problem, that the energy density released during this is so high, the pressure of accretion radiation will effectively stop it soon. Many physicists already support the model of dark matter stars or gravastars, which would allow the condensation of gas without excessive concentration of matter, accretion and premature radiation of energy. This is essentially a time reversed model: the galaxies were formed first in form of dense gas cloud and the black holes gradually separated from their centers like the oil droplets condensing from oil-water mixture. This model doesn't differ so much from gradual star formation from interstellar gas.
Torbjorn_Larsson_OM
5 / 5 (3) Aug 08, 2014
@Pexeso: Your comment has all sorts of problems, mainly that the research rejects your initial claim of "problem": they are showing by way of _radiation modeling_ that it works! "The high gas opacity traps the accretion radiation, while the low-mass BH's random motions suppress the formation of a slowly draining accretion disk."

Other problems is lack of references, and an unsubstantiated claim of "many" scientists supporting an alternative to the accepted black hole theory. [ http://en.wikiped...ravastar ]
yep
3.7 / 5 (3) Aug 09, 2014
More science creationism.
dogbert
1 / 5 (1) Aug 09, 2014
Alexander and Natarajan think they may have the answer—they note that shortly after the Big Bang, the universe was of course, much smaller and denser. Cold dense gas, they suggest, in the vicinity of a black hole would not have been susceptible to causing heat creation due to collisions.


How did the early universe come to have so much cold dense gas? Or how did the gas which existed cool down so quickly?
Arties
Aug 09, 2014
This comment has been removed by a moderator.
Arties
Aug 09, 2014
This comment has been removed by a moderator.
Arties
Aug 09, 2014
This comment has been removed by a moderator.
Arties
Aug 09, 2014
This comment has been removed by a moderator.

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more

Click here to reset your password.
Sign in to get notified via email when new comments are made.