Australian environmentalists welcome bank wariness on reef port

May 24, 2014
Protesters demonstrating for the protection of Australia's Great Barrier Reef on February 1, 2013

Environmentalists on Saturday welcomed Deutsche Bank's reluctance to invest in a major port expansion near Australia's Great Barrier Reef, saying it reflected global concern about the project.

Australia gave the green light to the major coal port expansion for India's Adani Group at Abbot Point on the Great Barrier Reef coast last year subject to strict environmental conditions.

But conservationists slammed the approval, warning it would hasten the natural wonder's demise given it is under pressure from climate change, land-based pollution and crown-of-thorn starfish outbreaks.

At its annual general meeting in Europe on Friday, Deutsche Bank said its policy for dealing with activities in or near World Heritage Sites ruled it out of investing in Abbot Point.

"Deutsche Bank does not support activities when the government and UNESCO do not agree that the planned activities do not place the exceptional universal value of the site at risk," the bank said.

"As we have seen, there is currently no consensus between UNESCO and the Australian government regarding the expansion of Abbot Point in the vicinity of the Great Barrier Reef.

"Our policy requires such a consensus at the least. We therefore would not consider applications for the financing of an expansion any further."

UNESCO has stated concerns about coastal development proposed in the region including port and coal operations, with the body expected to discuss the issue at a meeting in June.

The Australian Marine Conservation Society, which is campaigning against the port expansion, welcomed Deutsche Bank's stance, which it said showed global concern about plans to "industrialise the coastline of the Great Barrier Reef".

"Financiers are now dropping off Abbot Point like flies—signalling a growing unwillingness to be associated with the enormous financial and reputational risks that this project carries," said the society's Felicity Wishart.

"I mean, would you want your brand attached to the demise of one of the world's most precious natural icons—The Great Barrier Reef?"

Approved plans for the Abbot Point expansion allow for the dredging and dumping of millions of tonnes of seabed in the reef's waters under strict environmental conditions.

Australia's Environment Minister Greg Hunt has said that getting the management and protection of the reef right was a top priority for the government.

Abbot Point port is considered crucial to the development of coal mines in Queensland's Galilee Basin, delivering one of the country's most important exports to Asian markets.

Explore further: Australia approves major coal port expansion on reef

add to favorites email to friend print save as pdf

Related Stories

Australia approves major coal port expansion on reef

Dec 10, 2013

Australia gave the green light to a major coal port expansion for India's Adani Group on the Great Barrier Reef coast Tuesday under what were described as some of the nation's strictest-ever environmental ...

Recommended for you

Beijing's focus on coal lost in haze of smog

1 hour ago

The soaring, grimy chimneys of the coal-fired power station have belched the last of their choking fumes into Beijing's air, authorities say—but experts doubt the plan will ease the capital's smog.

Stopping the leaks

18 hours ago

When a big old cast-iron water main blows, it certainly makes for a spectacular media event.

Alpine lifelines on the brink

20 hours ago

Only one in ten Alpine rivers are healthy enough to maintain water supply and to cope with climate impacts according to a report by WWF. The publication is the first-ever comprehensive study on the condition ...

User comments : 11

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

Lex Talonis
4.3 / 5 (6) May 24, 2014
Drowning in pollution... in the air, on the soil and in the oceans...

"Abbot Point port is considered crucial to the development of coal mines in Queensland's Galilee Basin, delivering one of the country's most important exports to Asian markets."

"There goes the barrier reef........."

And the old mantras:

"Gotta make the sales" -

"Gotta burn MORE dirty coal.." -

"And dredge the fuck out of the sea bed while we do it..."

Never mind the collapse of the food chain from the ocean - to most of the worlds dinner plates.
Sinister1812
3.9 / 5 (7) May 24, 2014
Even the Deutsch Bank have more sense than the Lib government.
Vietvet
5 / 5 (6) May 24, 2014
Even the Deutsch Bank have more sense than the Lib government.



The mis-named Liberal Party in Australia is the conservative party. Comparable to Teaturds here.
Nik_2213
3.9 / 5 (7) May 24, 2014
"subject to strict environmental conditions" ?

They've selected the cheapest, nastiest alternative, completely ignoring the effects of drift, storms and shifting currents.

What are the odds that a laden dredger will have engine failure and be swept onto reef ??
Sinister1812
5 / 5 (6) May 24, 2014
Even the Deutsch Bank have more sense than the Lib government.



The mis-named Liberal Party in Australia is the conservative party. Comparable to Teaturds here.


Errm, that's what I meant. I should've been more clear and said Liberal Party, my mistake. I'm from there, so I know that. I usually vote left - Labor or The Greens.
Sinister1812
5 / 5 (5) May 24, 2014
Even the Deutsch Bank have more sense than the Lib government.


That sounded like a troll post, didn't it?
Caliban
5 / 5 (5) May 25, 2014
Even the Deutsch Bank have more sense than the Lib government.


That sounded like a troll post, didn't it?


Sinister,

Only if the context wasn't understood by the Reader. It was good of V V to clarify it for non- Australians, though.

animah
5 / 5 (3) May 25, 2014
http://www.ga.gov...ths.html

35,000km of coastline, and they had to put it there!
Sinister1812
5 / 5 (2) May 26, 2014
Even the Deutsch Bank have more sense than the Lib government.


That sounded like a troll post, didn't it?


Sinister,

Only if the context wasn't understood by the Reader. It was good of V V to clarify it for non- Australians, though.


Yeah it was. Just had to clarify what I meant as well. Got a couple 1s for that comment. :P
Vietvet
5 / 5 (3) May 26, 2014
@Sinster1812

I should have have just made my point without down voting. Sorry I was too quick to pull the trigger.
Sinister1812
5 / 5 (3) May 26, 2014
@Sinster1812

I should have have just made my point without down voting. Sorry I was too quick to pull the trigger.


Haha, no worries. It's all good. I blame whoever named the party "Liberal". lol!