"Super bacteria" cleaning up after oil spills

Mar 10, 2014
"We think that the data obtained from these experiments will be of considerable importance to the oil companies", says Roman Netzer at SINTEF. Credit: Thor Nielsen/SINTEF

Norwegian researchers in Trondheim have achieved surprising results by exploiting nature's own ability to clean up after oil spills.

We all know that can assist in cleaning up after . What is surprising is that given the right kind of encouragement, they can be even more effective.

"We know that oil spills happen – and that they will happen again", says Roman Netzer, a researcher and biologist at SINTEF. "We also know that this can have a major negative impact on the natural environment. This is why we've been studying a series of chemical and biological analytical techniques to assess the levels of seriousness of oil spills. We also wanted to find out whether so-called bioremediation represents an effective approach to cleaning up after such accidents", he explains.

Bioremediation is nature's way of cleaning up. Plants, bacterial decomposers or enzymes are used to remove contaminants and restore the balance of nature in the wake of pollution incidents.

When we clean up after an oil spill of a given size, such as along our shorelines, we start by applying mechanical methods using spades and brooms, combined with chemicals. However, we shouldn't deceive ourselves, even when the worst of the spill has been cleared away. The surface usually conceals oil buried deeper in the sediment.

"It is here that biological, or bioremediation, methods, come into their own", says Netzer. "This approach can make cleaning up operations even more thorough, and cost-effective. We wanted to find out what works – and how. And not least to gather data that can be used to support decision-making processes in situations where nature needs that little extra help" he explains.

So the researchers set up a number of experiments in the marine laboratory. Their aim was to look into how the microscopic residents of the oceans, such as bacteria and other microbes, can assist us in cleaning up pollutants, and whether they are capable of restoring the natural balance afterwards. And not least, to determine the limiting factors involved in this process. It was only after they had failed to achieve any significant response from their initial experiments, causing them to change the experimental parameters, that their sensational results emerged.

Imitating nature along the shoreline

Here at Brattørkaia in Trondheim, researchers have assembled a comprehensive "oil library" which they use in this type of research. The properties of the oils have been accurately measured and recorded, and this enabled the researchers to select the perfect oil for their experiment.

"The oil we chose is produced in large volumes on the Norwegian shelf, and is thus ideal for simulating a realistic scenario involving the accumulation of oil on a Norwegian shoreline", explains Netzer. "We then tried to simulate what happens in nature when oil becomes stranded", he says.

Sixteen tanks were filled with sediments, together with naturally-occurring bacterial flora, oil and seawater. The researchers also simulated the action of the tides by replacing the seawater and thus ensuring that there was an adequate supply of oxygen and nutrients. What then happened in the tanks was carefully recorded. But after a month of observations, only minor amounts of contaminants had been removed.

Biological analyses the most sensitive

Chemical and biological analyses carried out afterwards produced approximately the same results.

"However, we noted that the biological approaches, which analyse the concentrations of bacteria, their DNA, and oxygen consumption, were very sensitive and provided us with a great deal of information. Chemical approaches have to be very advanced in order to achieve the same detection thresholds" says Netzer.

"Even the results of the bacterial experiments were obviously disappointing", he explains. "But the biological results indicated that we were on the right track, and this gave us the idea to give nature a helping hand. We already knew that the bacteria would reproduce – and thus be more effective in their work – if they were provided with additional nutrients. In nature, bacteria flourish best in the presence of high concentrations of phosphates and nitrogen", says Netzer.

The problem is that the concentrations of these substances are insufficient", he says. So the researchers decided to give them a little supplement.

They also increased the water temperature, reduced the oxygen concentration and extended the duration of the experiment. The tidal regime was also adjusted, so that now there was a 12-hour interval (instead of the previous 3) between the introduction of new water to the tanks.

And this produced results! After one month, the researchers got their clear and unambiguous answers.

Analyses revealed that the extra nutrients had enabled the bacteria to work more effectively in breaking down the oil. At the same time, the increase in temperature, reduced and adjustment of the tidal cycle produced no significant effect.

"We think that the data obtained from these experiments will be of considerable importance to the oil companies – not least because they are now expanding their activities into environmentally-sensitive areas in and around the Barents Sea", says Netzer. He now envisages the introduction of a new weapon in the battle to clean up after oil spills.

"We believe that in time we will be able to make capsules which can attach themselves to rocks along the shoreline. These will provide the bacteria with ideal growing conditions by releasing nutrients as and when needed", says Netzer.

Explore further: Still-fresh remnants of Exxon Valdez oil protected by boulders

add to favorites email to friend print save as pdf

Related Stories

Oil dispersants not as harmful to marine life as predicted

Dec 04, 2013

The chemical dispersant used to counteract the Deepwater Horizon oil spill in the Gulf of Mexico in 2010 may not be as harmful to fish as first thought, says new research from Queen's professor Peter Hodson and his team of ...

Confronting threats to clean water

Nov 12, 2013

Despite the abundance of water on our planet, it remains a precious and sought after life-sustaining resource. Without the technology to provide safe, clean water to the masses, the general public would be consuming massive ...

Cold no curb on appetite

Sep 11, 2013

Living in a low temperature environment does not affect bacteria's appetite for hydrocarbons, according to recent research. This new knowledge could affect environmental risk assessment in the Arctic.

Recommended for you

Hopes, fears, doubts surround Cuba's oil future

23 hours ago

One of the most prolific oil and gas basins on the planet sits just off Cuba's northwest coast, and the thaw in relations with the United States is giving rise to hopes that Cuba can now get in on the action.

New challenges for ocean acidification research

Dec 19, 2014

Over the past decade, ocean acidification has received growing recognition not only in the scientific area. Decision-makers, stakeholders, and the general public are becoming increasingly aware of "the other carbon dioxide ...

Compromises lead to climate change deal

Dec 19, 2014

Earlier this month, delegates from the various states that make up the UN met in Lima, Peru, to agree on a framework for the Climate Change Conference that is scheduled to take place in Paris next year. For ...

User comments : 5

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

utomo_prawiro
4.7 / 5 (3) Mar 10, 2014
We need bacteria to eat daily garbage, which now is too many for a city. I hope there is a cheap but safe bacteria for this purpose. Example Jakarta produce 6500 Ton a day.
Jimee
5 / 5 (2) Mar 10, 2014
Research is just beginning on ways to recycle and reduce waste. Hopefully we will discover ways to do this before we drown in our own garbage.
vlaaing peerd
5 / 5 (2) Mar 11, 2014
@Utomo, organic waste can be dealt with quite sufficiently. Non organic, plastics, metals are best to separate and recycle, but practical implementation is expensive, hopefully you can vote for a local municipal that thinks this is important enough.

Greetings from Belanda. We owe you forever.
Sinister1812
5 / 5 (2) Mar 11, 2014
We need bacteria that dissolve plastic and other materials too. Seems to be a bit of that floating in the ocean.
ryggesogn2
1 / 5 (1) Mar 11, 2014
Enviros won't like this.
Technology is being used to enable cleaner use of oil.

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more

Click here to reset your password.
Sign in to get notified via email when new comments are made.