Anthropologist's new book explores how apes and humans evolved side by side

Mar 04, 2014 by William Harms
Prof. Russell Tuttle

(Phys.org) —The trajectory of human evolution has many markers, including footprints left in moist, volcanic ash 3.66 million years ago by three individuals in Laetoli, Tanzania.

Anthropologist Mary Leakey's team found them in 1978. She later called upon physical anthropologist Russell Tuttle to study them. The footprints are the oldest evidence that early hominids came down from trees and began walking upright.

"If you look at the footprints, they are quite similar to the footprints of ," said Tuttle, professor of anthropology and a leading expert on . People who live in the Amazon region who have never worn shoes have nearly matching , said Tuttle, author of Apes and Human Evolution, which Harvard University Press published in January.

In the book, Tuttle, one of the nation's leading paleoanthropologists, incorporates his research with a synthesis of a vast amount of research from other scientists who study primate evolution and behavior. The book explains how apes and humans evolved in relation to one another, and why humans became a bipedal, tool-making, culture-inventing species.

The Laetoli footprint pathway is about 90 feet long and provides a small glimpse to the origins of humans. Tuttle's research has shown that the hominids were quite short, probably 4 feet to 4 1/2 feet, a height that made them vulnerable to attack from lions and other large predators that would have been roaming the savannas of Africa after the hominid population increased and moved from the forests.

They represent one of several early hominid species that evolved, succeeded and then faded away—leaving behind fossils that are the record of our origins.

Although apes share some characteristics of humans, such as being able to walk upright and being able to communicate with each other, a notable behavioral gulf separates them from people, Tuttle said. 

Early humans' superior brains and their sociability, possibly developed when they made up bands of small creatures needing mutual defense in open areas, set them apart from other primates.

"Humans live in a unique symbolic niche: virtually everything we say, do, create, and make is consciously or unconsciously dependent upon symbols," Tuttle writes. "Although many other animals probably think about proximate situations, humans have beliefs about phenomena and relationships. Humans have social and moral codes, while apes are probably amoral."

Symbolically mediated language is an important part of the human story, but scholars are unable to agree on when or how it developed, Tuttle said. It could have emerged, for instance, when people started making increasingly complex tools and needed to communicate about how to use them. It could have begun as gestures that formed a basis for later verbal communication. The muscles and other organs that would have been involved do not survive in the fossils.

But Tuttle writes, "As the language of a hominid community grew more analytic, strong selective pressure for rapid analytic learning by children and sharing truthful information among close relatives resulted in language." Humans differ from apes in that they can transmit lessons to their children verbally and create a culture for their community. 

"There are clear adaptive advantages to individuals in societies that have common values, share resources gathered or produced according to individual skills, protect one another, and can rely on others to assist in child care and tuition instead of each individual having to provide entirely for herself, himself, and dependent progeny. At some point, communication systems became vital for coordinating subsistence activities and resolving disputes within and between groups."

Despite the distinctions between humans and non- primates, humans bear a special responsibility toward other primates, Tuttle said. Apes and other nonhuman primates should not be kept in solitary confinement and used for medical tests, for instance.

"It is time to acknowledge the major advances in behavioral and social sciences that demonstrate the remarkable cognitive abilities of apes. Although they might not be moral creatures, our treatment of them will surely reflect badly on our own morality until we change global public policy," he writes.

Explore further: Human ancestor was less-chimp-like than thought: study

add to favorites email to friend print save as pdf

Related Stories

Malaria: A vector infecting both apes and humans

May 03, 2013

In 2010, a study revealed that the main agent of malaria in humans, called Plasmodium falciparum, arose from the gorilla. Today, the vector which transmitted the parasite from apes to humans has just been i ...

Recommended for you

Life on Earth still favours evolution over creationism

Sep 11, 2014

Charles Darwin's Theory of Evolution, first published in 1859, offered a bold new explanation for how animals and plants diversified and still serves as the foundation underpinning all medical and biological ...

Non-dominant hand vital to the evolution of the thumb

Sep 10, 2014

New research from biological anthropologists at the University of Kent has shown that the use of the non-dominant hand was likely to have played a vital role in the evolution of modern human hand morphology.

Sloths are no slouches when it comes to evolution

Sep 10, 2014

Today's sloths might be known as slow, small animals, but their ancestors developed large body sizes at an amazing rate, according to an evolutionary reconstruction published today in the open access journal ...

User comments : 0