Why some air crash investigations remain mysteries of the deep

Mar 11, 2014 by Sidney Dekker
More than 100 vessels and aircraft from eight countries looking for missing Malaysia Airlines flight MH370, which disappeared on Saturday with 239 people on board. Credit: EPA/Ahman Yusni

The missing Malaysia Airlines flight MH370 has some similarities to the disappearance of Pan Am flight 944, which disappeared into the Pacific Ocean almost 50 years ago.

Late in the afternoon of November 8, 1957, the propeller-driven Boeing 377 vanished, with no distress call heard from the pilots.

The plane was on its first leg of a round-the-world journey that began in San Francisco. Its next stop would have been Honolulu but the airliner never arrived.

The biggest air-sea search since the vanishing of Amelia Earhart was launched, but even with those resources it took days before floating bodies and some debris was found.

The missing Malaysia Airlines flight

Things are quite different in 2014 with the disappearance of Malaysia Airlines flight MH370 on Saturday.

A Boeing 777 is a lot bigger than a Boeing 377. The water in which it disappeared is not as deep as the Pacific. The Boeing 777 has emergency locator equipment on board that sends out signals for weeks, which helps locate the wreckage.

And once they are found, the various onboard recorders carry a vast electronic footprint of hundreds of flight parameters, offering a second-by-second story of the position and trend of many of its systems and components.

This is why the vanishing of a big jet in 2014 is so befuddling. Virtually all jet airplanes lost to the sea since the 1950s (the start of the jet age) have been found, if not recovered.

But it can take a while. The world is still a big place – and 70% of it is covered in water.

Discovery takes time

It took two years to locate the main wreckage of Air France 447, an Airbus jet that disappeared into the Atlantic in 2009 between Brazil and Africa.

Adam Air, a Boeing 737-400 carrying 102 people, vanished over Indonesian waters between Surabaya and Manado on January 1, 2007, taking all lives with it. Its fate, too, remained a mystery for a while.

It took a week for an Indonesian ship to detect metal on the sea floor, but that was not necessarily conclusive. It took another two weeks for the US Navy to pick up signals from the plane's recorders, and seven months for the recorders to be actually recovered.

The wreckage is still on the sea floor. The final investigation report concluded that the pilots had become occupied with trouble-shooting their inertial navigation system and, after the autopilot inadvertently disconnected, lost control of the aircraft.

Looking for clues

A Malaysian coast guard ship during search and rescue operations for a missing Malaysian Airlines flight off the coast of Malaysia. Credit: EPA/Malaysian Maritime Agencey

The clues that were recovered from the Pan Am 944 accident give some indication of the sorts of things that investigators might be looking for when they eventually do find Malaysia flight MH370.

In Pan Am's case 19 bodies were recovered – 14 of them were wearing life vests but no shoes. This suggested that some preparations had been made for ditching.

Fragments of the fuselage indicated that the plane hit the ocean with the nose slightly down and the right wing lowered. Several of the recovered bodies showed impact trauma, but most died from drowning.

This suggests that 944's final plunge into the sea was not completely uncontrolled. This was supported by the finding that the wreckage had burn marks but only above the waterline. It indicated a post-crash fire: there was no evidence of a fire inflight.

Finding the 'eureka part'

We go to these lengths of investigation because we not only want to find the jet—we want to find out what went wrong. We need to find the "eureka part" that helps us to know why it disappeared.

But even when we find the jet, and the recorders, and we come up with a reasonable explanation, some mysteries will never be solved.

Despite meticulous investigation, many crashes contain irreducible uncertainties that niggle away at investigators and nourish conspiracy theorists alike, even when there is broad agreement on what probably happened. This is perhaps especially true of those aircraft that disappear into the sea.

Trans World Airline flight 800, a Boeing 747 classic that seemed to have exploded or been ripped apart in mid-air after take off from New York on its way to Paris and Rome in 1996, led to one of the most expensive investigations ever.

Pieces from the wreckage were painstakingly reconstructed into a semblance of the aircraft in one of the National Transportation Safety Board's hangars near Washington.

Yet the "eureka part" of Trans World Airline flight 800 was never found. The incident gave rise to a number of conspiracy theories:

  • a light streaking towards the jet, was seen by some witnesses just prior to the explosion
  • metal in one place seemed bent inwards and then outwards, pointing to a hole created by an external projectile
  • microscopic traces of pentaerythritol tetranitrate PETN, a compound used in plastic explosives, were found on a piece of flooring from the passenger compartment.

A conspiracy, involving the US Navy, a test missile, the FBI and a whole host of other agencies, would become one candidate explanation. The FBI said later that these traces were consistent with explosives allegedly spilled during a canine training exercise a few weeks before the crash.

Parts of the wreckage of the the Air France flight 447 found deep in the Atlantic Ocean. Credit: EPA/BAE

The chairman of the National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB) at the time, Jim Hall, alluded to the challenge to the reputation of his entire agency.

"What you're dealing with here is much more than an aviation accident because of the profile of the crash," he said. "What you have at stake here is the credibility of this agency and the credibility of the government to run an investigation."

Yet he would not be the first without a "eureka part" to show for his efforts. Or the last.

The debris from Pan Am flight 944 had been found 145km north of its intended track. A plausible reason for that has still not been found.

Malaysia Airlines MH370 might similarly not be found along its planned track. Perhaps the crew initiated a U-turn after discovering some problem that called for a return.

And even though the recorders and some of the wreckage of Air France 447 were eventually recovered from the deepest crevasses in the ocean floor ever, mysteries still remain.

Minutes before the Airbus hit the surface of the Atlantic, the cockpit voice recorder had the Captain instruct one of the other pilots: "alors tiens prends, prends ça."

In French, this means "take that, grab hold of that,". But "prends ça" can also mean "look at that". We don't know what he meant or what he pointed at, if anything. We will never know.

Questions are still being asked as to what caused TWA Flight 800 to explode and crash into the Atlantic in 1996. A group called the Flight 800 Independent Researchers Organisation (FIRO) is dedicated to helping official investigators determine the cause of the as yet unresolved disaster. There was even a documentary produced questioning the cause of the crash.

Some 47 years after the Pan Am 944 accident, a newspaper publisher and history professor are still investigating the causes of the crash, in which they lost dear ones or acquaintances.

If and when Malaysia Airlines flight MH370 is found, it may similarly keep some of its mysteries to itself.

Explore further: And the award for the safest airline in 2013 goes to ...

add to favorites email to friend print save as pdf

Related Stories

And the award for the safest airline in 2013 goes to ...

Jan 20, 2014

At the beginning of each year an array of awards are given in numerous industries to the top performers of the prior year. In the arts, Cate Blanchett won a Golden Globe last week for her performance in Blue Jasmine, and in sport, Cristiano Ronaldo won the Ballon d'Or ...

Lufthansa expands in-flight smartphone usage

Feb 13, 2014

Lufthansa, Germany's biggest airline, said Thursday it will allow passengers to use a range of mobile electronic devices in flight on all Airbus aircraft starting from next month.

WHOI-led team locates Air France wreckage

Apr 05, 2011

A search team led by the Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution (WHOI) has located the wreckage of Air France Flight 447 some 3,900 meters, or nearly 2.5 miles, below the surface of the Atlantic Ocean off Brazil’s ...

Recommended for you

Sistine chapel dazzles after technological makeover

19 hours ago

High above the altar in the Vatican's Sistine Chapel, the halo around Jesus Christ's head in Michelangelo's famous frescoes shines with a brighter glow, thanks to a revolutionary new lighting system.

Free urban data—what's it good for?

Oct 29, 2014

Cities around the world are increasingly making urban data freely available to the public. But is the content or structure of these vast data sets easy to access and of value? A new study of more than 9,000 ...

Rice team sets sights on better voting machine

Oct 27, 2014

At the urging of county election officials in Austin, Texas, a group of Rice University engineers and social scientists has pulled together a team of U.S. experts to head off a little-known yet looming crisis ...

User comments : 3

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

Skepticus
5 / 5 (2) Mar 11, 2014
If the plane was hit by a small meteoroid, just big enough to puncture the aircraft, then boom. The chances are exceedingly small, but not zero. There would be no warning, no mayday. Out in the nowhere of the open ocean, there would be no witnesses for the light trail of the rock.
LariAnn
5 / 5 (2) Mar 11, 2014
The meteoroid possibility seems plausible enough, given the number of airplanes aloft at any given time plus the numerous meteoroids that are invariably entering Earth's atmosphere day and night. Sooner or later it seems inevitable that one would strike an aircraft, with dire results.
Sinister1812
not rated yet Mar 12, 2014
How does a large plane go missing anyway? That's some Bermuda Triangle stuff right there.

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more

Click here to reset your password.
Sign in to get notified via email when new comments are made.