Climate change refugees are our responsibility

Feb 18, 2014 by Åsa Wahlquist
A child surrounded by flood water in Bangladesh. Credit: DFID-Rafiqur Rahman Raqu

Australia needs to plan for an influx of climate change refugees from neighbouring countries that face ever increasing risks from cyclones, rising sea levels and more severe droughts, according to a researcher at the University of Technology, Sydney (UTS).

Fears about waves of mass migration from climate change are unfounded, says the university's Elaine Kelly. But Dr Kelly, a UTS Chancellor's Post Doctoral Research Fellow, says Australia should start planning migration streams that include people who have lost their homes to climate change, in addition to those we already accept for other humanitarian reasons.

"The reality is climate change will provoke more displacement, and displacement of those who are most poor," says Dr Kelly. "How are we going to plan for that?"

The international community is now talking less about how to cut carbon dioxide (CO2) levels in the atmosphere and more about how to cope with the dramatic changes excessive amounts of CO2 will have on climate and temperatures, she says. One of the solutions is planned migration from those areas particularly vulnerable to the effects of climate change to less vulnerable places.

It is a major shift in thinking that has yet to be adopted by Australian politicians.

"We need to think about local, regional and international ways of regulating migration if we want to do it well," says Dr Kelly. "Australia needs to be involved in the [international] talks around climate change funding and how to initiate funds and implement these sorts of programs. But at the moment, we are withdrawing from those sorts of conversations," she says.

Dr Kelly argues that because climate change is increasing the pressure for people living in south-east Asia to migrate to safer regions, it is more important than ever that the debate about migration, and particularly about refugees, should be based on ethics rather than politics or national security.

In November, one of the strongest cyclones to hit the Philippines, Typhoon Haiyang, killed thousands of people and left millions homeless. A month earlier, in India, more than half a million people were evacuated from their homes before another cyclone hit. In May, one million people were evacuated as a cyclone hit Bangladesh, a country particularly vulnerable to cyclones and flooding.

Most climate change adaption will be local, says Dr Kelly. For example, from low-lying rural areas in Bangladesh to the capital, Dhaka, is expected to increase the city's population to 40 million by 2050 from 15 million today.

Dr Kelly has observed a sense of hospitality in the international refugee program for those suffering political persecution, a sense sorely lacking in Australia.

"Hospitality to affected countries from the industrial countries responsible for climate change must be seen as either a mode of adaptation or a form of compensation for profound losses and damages caused by climate change," she says.

"I would love to see a reasoned discussion of [the ethics of ] in Australia, one that isn't polemic and isn't driven by fear. I'd love to see a discussion that looks at the human issues and at the pragmatic approaches that government can take."

She also wants to see research conducted in communities that have welcomed migrants and regional communities that want more people.

"How can we develop and implement welcoming policies at that level? I'd love to see conversations happening at local levels and then putting pressure on members of parliament, and the state and federal governments to engage in the conversation."

Explore further: Climate change restricts migrant species access to oceans

add to favorites email to friend print save as pdf

Related Stories

Australia's gum trees 'at risk'

Dec 17, 2013

Many of Australia's iconic eucalypt ecosystems could change beyond recognition due to increased climate stress.

Climate change research is globally skewed

Jan 23, 2014

The supply of climate change knowledge is biased towards richer countries - those that pollute the most and are least vulnerable to climate change – and skewed away from the poorer, fragile and more vulnerable regions of ...

Recommended for you

TransCanada seeks approvals for pipeline to Atlantic

9 hours ago

TransCanada on Thursday filed for regulatory approval of a proposed Can$12 billion (US$10.7 billion) pipeline to carry western Canadian oil to Atlantic coast refineries and terminals, for shipping overseas.

Does it help conservation to put a price on nature?

12 hours ago

Putting a price on the services which a particular ecosystem provides may encourage the adoption of greener policies, but it may come at the price of biodiversity conservation. Writing today in the journal ...

Reef-builders with a sense of harmony

14 hours ago

Cold-water corals of the species Lophelia pertusa are able to fuse skeletons of genetically distinct individuals. On dives with JAGO, a research submersible stationed at GEOMAR Helmholtz Centre for Ocean Research Kiel, scientists ...

User comments : 2

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

mememine69
2.3 / 5 (3) Feb 18, 2014
"Believe" in what?
Science has NEVER "believed" beyond; "could be".
Prove that science "believes" as much as you "believers" do or at least stop telling kids that science agrees with your "belief".
And stop embarrassing yourselves and get up to date;
*Occupywallstreet now does not even mention CO2 in its list of demands because of the bank-funded and corporate run carbon trading stock markets ruled by politicians.
*Canada killed Y2Kyoto with a freely elected climate change denying prime minister and nobody cared, especially the millions of scientists warning us of unstoppable warming (a comet hit).
Howhot
5 / 5 (2) Feb 23, 2014
"Believe" in what?

There is no belief, just facts and logic. How people react?; now that is belief. However @meme
the millions of scientists warning us of unstoppable warming (a comet hit).
is true. Mankind has never seen an atmosphere with 400ppm of CO2 in it. Not in it's 10 million year existence. Life that has seen higher CO2 levels are extinct. You be the judge. It's science that major CO2 events follow comet strikes (from major volcanism) and it is also true that every major extinction event occurred after sharp rise in CO2. So yeah, like a comet stricke, we could in 100 years look like a planet on the verge of extinction due to fossil fuel created CO2!

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more

Click here to reset your password.
Sign in to get notified via email when new comments are made.