Overcoming linguistic taboos: Lessons from Australia

Dec 11, 2013

Grammar is sometimes shaped by restrictions on language use. This is the key finding of a new study to be published in the December issue of the scholarly journal Language, demonstrating how taboos can bring on changes to language structures. The paper, "Preference organization driving structuration: Evidence from Australian Aboriginal Interaction for pragmatically motivated grammaticalization" is authored by Joe Blythe of the University of Melbourne, Australia, and the Max Planck Institute for Psycholinguistics in Nijmegen, the Netherlands.

In many Australian Aboriginal languages there are taboos that limit the use of personal names. When we speak in a group about someone known to all present, we need to ensure that who is referred to can be recognized, and names are obvious means that can secure that recognition. But if a particular person's name is restricted by a taboo, another means should be sought.

Luckily, extensive and detailed family relationships are expressed in the grammars of many Australian Aboriginal languages. These grammatical kinship inflections have apparently evolved because they are useful in dealing with the taboos that limit the use of personal names. When a particular name becomes unavailable, speakers of the Aboriginal Murrinh-Patha can use their kin-inflected grammar to allow others to recognize the person being spoken about, avoiding the tabooed name. For example, a woman can avoid saying the name of her late husband by stating, 'We two who were not brother and sister left' (ngankungintha ngunungamnginthadurr). After that, she can single out her late husband by using a form that will be understood to mean "he," as in, 'He put bullets in that big rifle as he came along this way' (thungku banurdurditharragathu thungku ngalla nyiniyu). Making the initial reference dual ('we two') and the subsequent reference singular ('he') is a routinized pattern of language use. It places the burden of inference on the kin-inflected grammar, sidestepping the need to specify individuals by name. Widespread taboos on personal names have led to the development of kin-based inflections in languages across the Australian continent because these structures can secure recognition when names are not appropriate.

Employing tools from historical linguistics and conversation analysis, this research provides a more complete picture of language evolution by presenting a longitudinal view of grammatical change along with a detailed view of a still evolving language in face-to-face conversation. It shows how the requirement for name-avoidance has most likely given rise to the kinship inflections that allow person recognition to be achieved. This study illustrates that an examination of how and for what practical purposes some linguistic structures are used in social interaction can reveal just why they emerge in the first place.

Explore further: Grammatical structures as a window into the past

More information: A pre-print version is available online at: http://www.linguisticsociety.org/document/language-vol-89-issue-4-news-release-article. A synopsis of the paper is available at: http://preferenceorganization.wordpress.com/.

Provided by Linguistic Society of America

4.3 /5 (3 votes)
add to favorites email to friend print save as pdf

Related Stories

New language discovery reveals linguistic insights

Jun 18, 2013

A new language has been discovered in a remote Indigenous community in northern Australia that is generated from a unique combination of elements from other languages. Light Warlpiri has been documented by University of Michigan ...

Grammatical structures as a window into the past

Nov 04, 2013

A new large-scale database and atlas of key structural properties of mixed languages from the Americas, Africa and Asia-Pacific has been published by researchers at the Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary ...

Language fuels the Balkans' ethnic tensions, linguist says

Jun 27, 2013

(Phys.org) —Nowhere has linguistic research involved more discord than in the Balkans. Serbian and Bulgarian linguists have both attempted to prove that Macedonian – one of the official languages of the Republics of Yugoslavia ...

Historical context guides language development

Apr 14, 2011

Not only do we humans enjoy talking -- and talking a lot -- we also do so in very different ways: about 6,000 languages are spoken today worldwide. How this wealth of expression developed, however, largely remains a mystery. ...

Study shows humans and apes learn language differently

Apr 02, 2013

(Medical Xpress)—How do children learn language? Many linguists believe that the stages that a child goes through when learning language mirror the stages of language development in primate evolution. ...

Recommended for you

User comments : 2

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

geokstr
not rated yet Dec 12, 2013
It's not necessary to go to the Outback and study aboriginals to see the effects of taboos on language.

You can go to any public indoctrination center, which we used to call schools and universities, to see the pernicious effects of political correctness and how quickly it can be used to shut down controversial language, and how that influences whether topics uncomfortable or disadvantageous to statists can be discussed at all.

NewSpeak is already considered doubleplusgood to the left. Soon we will have always been at war with MiddleAsia.

Orwell only got two things wrong: the year and Big Bro's melanin content.
Humpty
not rated yet Dec 13, 2013
Well said.