Who you know: Study shows favoritism is ubiquitous in labor markets

Oct 14, 2013

(Phys.org) —Workplace discrimination can destroy morale, breed resentment and lead to lost productivity and unemployment. Although equal-opportunity laws have been created to address discrimination, do they also address favoritism in the workplace? According to a new economics study from The University of Texas at Austin and Maastricht University, inclusion may be more of a factor than exclusion in un-leveling the playing field.

The study, co-authored by Daniel Hamermesh, professor of economics at The University of Texas at Austin, reveals a marked distinction between in-group favoritism (endophilia) and out-group (exophobia) in schools, which could carry over to labor markets.

"We need to reconsider what we know about the effectiveness of anti-discrimination policies and the advances against discrimination in the labor market," says Jan Feld, an economist at Maastricht University and lead author of the study. "These two preferences generate different outcomes with different distributions of welfare, so that determining their relative size is economically important and, as we have shown, possible."

Although the words "favoritism" and "discrimination" seem to have similar meanings, favoritism actually describes a preference for others who are similar to oneself rather than hostility toward others perceived to be different. This subtle distinction can lead to very different outcomes.

As part of the study, the researchers examined 1,495 final exam results from 25 courses at Maastricht University in the Netherlands. Since the university has a large share of German students (51 percent) and academic staff (22 percent) mixed with Dutch and other nationalities, this environment was particularly appropriate for distinguishing between favoritism and discrimination.

Researchers randomly included and excluded names on the students' final exams, thus allowing or not allowing 42 graders to infer the students' gender and nationality. They found, on average, the graders showed favoritism but not discrimination by nationality. They also found no evidence, on average, of differential treatment by gender.

Seeing unfair management practices through the lens of , rather than discrimination alone, is revealing, says Hamermesh. Results from the study have important implications for anti-discriminatory policies such as affirmative action and corporate human resource practices.

"Having shown that endophilia is more important than exophobia suggests we should focus more on getting those in the majority not to view their own group as better, and less on getting them to view minorities as their equals," Hamermesh says.

The study was issued this month by the National Bureau of Economic Research.

Explore further: A two generation lens: Current state policies fail to support families with young children

add to favorites email to friend print save as pdf

Related Stories

'Weightism' increases risk for becoming, staying obese

Jul 24, 2013

Weight discrimination may increase risk for obesity rather than motivating individuals to lose weight, according to research published July 24 in the open access journal PLoS ONE by Angelina Sutin and Antonio Terracciano from t ...

Epilepsy discrimination still rife

May 28, 2013

People with epilepsy continue to face high rates of stigma and discrimination, particularly in the workplace, according to Flinders University disability expert Dr Michelle Bellon.

Discrimination may harm your health

Jan 12, 2012

Racial discrimination may be harmful to your health, according to new research from Rice University sociologists Jenifer Bratter and Bridget Gorman.

Recommended for you

Scholar tracks the changing world of gay sexuality

Sep 19, 2014

With same-sex marriage now legalized in 19 states and laws making it impossible to ban homosexuals from serving in the military, gay, lesbian and bisexual people are now enjoying more freedoms and rights than ever before.

User comments : 0