Face-to-face: Skull study shows variation of pre-Columbian cultures in Mexico

Sep 11, 2013 by Matt Shipman
Highlighted areas show regions where the prehistoric skulls came from. Click to enlarge. Credit: Ashley Humphries

(Phys.org) —A new analysis of the skulls of prehistoric peoples in Mexico reveals significant regional variation in the facial characteristics of indigenous populations – indicating that there were notable physical differences between geographically separate groups before the arrival of Europeans.

"There has long been a school of thought that there was little physical variation prior to European contact," says Ann Ross, a at NC State who co-authored a paper on the work. "But we've found that there were clear differences between indigenous peoples before Europeans or Africans arrived in what is now Mexico."

The research team looked at skulls dating from A.D. 1 through the late 15th century. The researchers assessed facial landmarks, such as the cheekbones, the bones surrounding the eyes and the bridge of the nose. For purposes of comparison, the researchers also examined skulls of Spanish, African American and Mayan origin, dating to after Europeans arrived in Mexico.

After evaluating the skulls, the researchers ran statistical analyses of the facial landmarks. The results of those analyses allowed them to compute something called the Mahalanobis distance, which allowed them to measure the overall difference between the population groups. This assessment showed a clear separation between populations in different parts of pre-Columbian Mexico.

"This makes it clear that there was no clear, overarching phenotype for indigenous populations," says Ashley Humphries, a Ph.D. student at the University of South Florida (USF) and lead author of the paper. "All native peoples did not look alike."

The paper, "A Geometric Morphometric Study of Regional Craniofacial Variation in Mexico," was published online Sept. 4 in the International Journal of Osteoarchaeology. Co-authors include Ashley Maxwell, also a Ph.D. student at USF and Douglas Ubelaker of the National Museum of Natural History. Humphries and Maxwell both worked with Ross while master's students at NC State.

Explore further: Ancient clay seals may shed light on biblical era

More information: onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10… 002/oa.2345/abstract

Related Stories

Mexico finds 50 skulls in sacred Aztec temple

Oct 06, 2012

(AP)—Mexican archaeologists said Friday they uncovered the largest number of skulls ever found in one offering at the most sacred temple of the Aztec empire dating back more than 500 years.

Recommended for you

Ancient clay seals may shed light on biblical era

17 hours ago

Impressions from ancient clay seals found at a small site in Israel east of Gaza are signs of government in an area thought to be entirely rural during the 10th century B.C., says Mississippi State University archaeologist ...

Digging up the 'Spanish Vikings'

Dec 19, 2014

The fearsome reputation of the Vikings has made them the subject of countless exhibitions, books and films - however, surprisingly little is known about their more southerly exploits in Spain.

Short-necked Triassic marine reptile discovered in China

Dec 17, 2014

A new species of short-necked marine reptile from the Triassic period has been discovered in China, according to a study published December 17, 2014 in the open-access journal PLOS ONE by Xiao-hong Chen f ...

Gothic cathedrals blend iron and stone

Dec 17, 2014

Using radiocarbon dating on metal found in Gothic cathedrals, an interdisciplinary team has shown, for the first time through absolute dating, that iron was used to reinforce stone from the construction phase. ...

User comments : 2

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

tadchem
2.2 / 5 (6) Sep 11, 2013
To 15th century Europeans, they 'all looked alike'.
Lorentz Descartes
1 / 5 (6) Sep 12, 2013
Not so tadchem, I remember writing a paper about the travel logs of Cortes etc during college. Many accounts described wild facial differences within the Indians, and how those related to class. Some of the inbred nobility must've looked wild, with cleft chins or tiny noses etc.

But it's true that the average continent bound European was very ill informed. I could understand that, with N americans being so genetically similar because of the founder effect, every bit of variation was cherished.

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more

Click here to reset your password.
Sign in to get notified via email when new comments are made.