Face-to-face: Skull study shows variation of pre-Columbian cultures in Mexico

Sep 11, 2013 by Matt Shipman
Highlighted areas show regions where the prehistoric skulls came from. Click to enlarge. Credit: Ashley Humphries

(Phys.org) —A new analysis of the skulls of prehistoric peoples in Mexico reveals significant regional variation in the facial characteristics of indigenous populations – indicating that there were notable physical differences between geographically separate groups before the arrival of Europeans.

"There has long been a school of thought that there was little physical variation prior to European contact," says Ann Ross, a at NC State who co-authored a paper on the work. "But we've found that there were clear differences between indigenous peoples before Europeans or Africans arrived in what is now Mexico."

The research team looked at skulls dating from A.D. 1 through the late 15th century. The researchers assessed facial landmarks, such as the cheekbones, the bones surrounding the eyes and the bridge of the nose. For purposes of comparison, the researchers also examined skulls of Spanish, African American and Mayan origin, dating to after Europeans arrived in Mexico.

After evaluating the skulls, the researchers ran statistical analyses of the facial landmarks. The results of those analyses allowed them to compute something called the Mahalanobis distance, which allowed them to measure the overall difference between the population groups. This assessment showed a clear separation between populations in different parts of pre-Columbian Mexico.

"This makes it clear that there was no clear, overarching phenotype for indigenous populations," says Ashley Humphries, a Ph.D. student at the University of South Florida (USF) and lead author of the paper. "All native peoples did not look alike."

The paper, "A Geometric Morphometric Study of Regional Craniofacial Variation in Mexico," was published online Sept. 4 in the International Journal of Osteoarchaeology. Co-authors include Ashley Maxwell, also a Ph.D. student at USF and Douglas Ubelaker of the National Museum of Natural History. Humphries and Maxwell both worked with Ross while master's students at NC State.

Explore further: Asian origins of native American dogs confirmed

More information: onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/oa.2345/abstract

Related Stories

Mexico finds 50 skulls in sacred Aztec temple

Oct 06, 2012

(AP)—Mexican archaeologists said Friday they uncovered the largest number of skulls ever found in one offering at the most sacred temple of the Aztec empire dating back more than 500 years.

Recommended for you

Egypt archaeologists find ancient writer's tomb

Apr 19, 2014

Egypt's minister of antiquities says a team of Spanish archaeologists has discovered two tombs in the southern part of the country, one of them belonging to a writer and containing a trove of artifacts including reed pens ...

Crowd-sourcing Britain's Bronze Age

Apr 17, 2014

A new joint project by the British Museum and the UCL Institute of Archaeology is seeking online contributions from members of the public to enhance a major British Bronze Age archive and artefact collection.

Roman dig 'transforms understanding' of ancient port

Apr 17, 2014

(Phys.org) —Researchers from the universities of Cambridge and Southampton have discovered a new section of the boundary wall of the ancient Roman port of Ostia, proving the city was much larger than previously ...

User comments : 2

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

tadchem
2.2 / 5 (6) Sep 11, 2013
To 15th century Europeans, they 'all looked alike'.
Lorentz Descartes
1 / 5 (6) Sep 12, 2013
Not so tadchem, I remember writing a paper about the travel logs of Cortes etc during college. Many accounts described wild facial differences within the Indians, and how those related to class. Some of the inbred nobility must've looked wild, with cleft chins or tiny noses etc.

But it's true that the average continent bound European was very ill informed. I could understand that, with N americans being so genetically similar because of the founder effect, every bit of variation was cherished.

More news stories

Clippers and coiners in 16th-century England

In 2017 a new £1 coin will appear in our pockets with a design extremely difficult to forge. In the mid-16th century, Elizabeth I's government came up with a series of measures to deter "divers evil persons" ...

Making graphene in your kitchen

Graphene has been touted as a wonder material—the world's thinnest substance, but super-strong. Now scientists say it is so easy to make you could produce some in your kitchen.