Removing complexity layers from the universe's creation

July 26, 2013

Complicated statistical behaviour observed in complex systems such as early universe can often be understood if it is broken down into simpler ones. Two physicists, Petr Jizba (currently affiliated with the Czech Technical University in Prague), and Fabio Scardigli (now working at Kyoto University in Japan), have just published results in EPJ C pertaining to theoretical predictions of such cosmological systems' dynamics.

Their work focuses on complex dynamical systems whose statistical behaviour can be explained in terms of a superposition of simpler underlying dynamics. They found that the combination of two cornerstones of contemporary physics—namely Einstein's special relativity and quantum-mechanical dynamics—is mathematically identical to a complex described by two interlocked processes operating at different energy scales. The combined dynamic obeys Einstein's special relativity even though neither of the two underlying dynamics does. This implies that Einstein's might well be an emergent concept and suggests that it would be worthwhile to further develop Einstein's insights to take into account the quantum structure of space and time.

To model the double process in question, the authors consider quantum mechanical dynamics in a background space consisting of a number of small crystal-like domains varying in size and composition, known as polycrystalline space. There, particles exhibit an analogous motion to pollen grains in water, referred to as Brownian motion. The observed relativistic dynamics then comes solely from a particular grain distribution in the polycrystalline space. In the cosmological context such distribution might form during the 's formation.

Finally, the authors' new interpretation focuses on the interaction of a with gravity, that, according to Einstein's , can be understood as propagation in curved space-time. The non-existence of the relativistic dynamics on the basic level of the description leads to a natural mechanism for the formation of asymmetry between particles and anti-particles. When coupled with an inflationary cosmology, the authors' approach predicts that a charge asymmetry should have been produced at ultra-minute fractions of seconds after the Big Bang. This prediction is in agreement with constraints born out of recent cosmological observations.

Explore further: One clock with two times: When quantum mechanics meets general relativity

More information: European Physical Journal C 73: 2491, DOI 10.1140/epjc/s10052-013-2491-x

Related Stories

Is dark energy static or dynamic?

November 12, 2012

(—While hypothesized dark energy can explain observations of the universe expanding at an accelerating rate, the specific properties of dark energy are still an enigma. Scientists think that dark energy could take ...

Revealing quantum flow

December 28, 2012

(—UK-based physicist Ole Steuernagel from the University of Hertfordshire, alongside Dimitris Kakofengitis and Georg Ritter, have found that a new powerful tool they call 'Wigner flow' is the quantum analogue of ...

Researchers explore quantum entanglement

February 8, 2013

Albert Einstein called quantum entanglement—two particles in different locations, even on other sides of the universe, influencing each other—"spooky action at a distance."

GR20/Amaldi10: Space-time is not the same for everyone

July 9, 2013

Before the Big Bang, space-time as we know it did not exist. So how was it born? The process of creating normal space-time from an earlier state dominated by quantum gravity has been studied for years by theorists at the ...

Recommended for you

Test racetrack dipole magnet produces record 16 tesla field

November 30, 2015

A new world record has been broken by the CERN magnet group when their racetrack test magnet produced a 16.2 tesla (16.2T) peak field – nearly twice that produced by the current LHC dipoles and the highest ever for a dipole ...

Turbulence in bacterial cultures

November 30, 2015

Turbulent flows surround us, from complex cloud formations to rapidly flowing rivers. Populations of motile bacteria in liquid media can also exhibit patterns of collective motion that resemble turbulent flows, provided the ...

CERN collides heavy nuclei at new record high energy

November 25, 2015

The world's most powerful accelerator, the 27 km long Large Hadron Collider (LHC) operating at CERN in Geneva established collisions between lead nuclei, this morning, at the highest energies ever. The LHC has been colliding ...


Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

1 / 5 (2) Jul 26, 2013
"...and suggests that it would be worthwhile to further develop Einstein's insights to take into account the quantum structure of space and time."

Oh my gosh! Why didn't I think of that!

It's kind of comical when someone writes with such a supercilious air, who seems to have no idea of what he's writing about - "Their work focuses on complex dynamical systems whose statistical behaviour can be explained in terms of a superposition of simpler underlying dynamics." So are these these two dynamical systems entangled?

5 / 5 (2) Jul 27, 2013
It's a thought experiment. Cool jets, hematite, there's nothing wrong with thought experiments.

What they're saying is that relativity at macro scales *might be* an emergent property of two or more small-scale systems of natural rules, and so discrepancies between relativity and quantum mechanics *might* vanish if we knew what the other small-scale system(s) are, what natural laws they obey. They tested the idea with modeling two simple small-scale systems, with interesting results.

They didn't claim to have proved that those two small-scale systems are real.

It's an interesting way to think about the problem of incompatibility between relativity and quantum mechanics, that's all.

Your question, "So are these two dynamical systems entangled?" seems to be meaningless. The two modeled subsystems interacted to produce relativity as an emergent phenomenon. Entanglement is a quantum mechanical property.
1 / 5 (2) Jul 27, 2013
The links goes back to LQG, so is uninteresting. (LQG has no dynamics, so can't be a basis for physics.)

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more

Click here to reset your password.
Sign in to get notified via email when new comments are made.