Shellfish show population growth did not send humans out of Africa

Jun 18, 2013 by Marcia Malory report
Cymbula oculus (Born, 1778). .Credit: H. Zell / Wikipedia.

(Phys.org) —Artifacts from the Middle Stone Age, which lasted from about 200,000 to 50,000 years ago, provide us with the earliest glimpses of modern human art and culture. Previously, scientists thought an increase in population drove the behavioral innovations that led to the creation of these artifacts and eventually, the expansion out of Africa. However, by examining mollusk shells from Stone Age sites, Richard Klein of Stanford University and Teresa Steele of University of California, Davis, have determined that a significant population increase did not occur until the Late Stone Age, after the migration out of Africa had already begun. Their research appears in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

Archeologists have found precursors of modern human artwork and jewelry, including fragments of ochre with abstract and shells with , in Middle Stone Age sites. The humans who made them, between 85,000 and 65,000 years ago, must have had modern and exhibited modern behaviors. During the Late Stone Age, these abilities and behaviors allowed humans to create objects that are recognizable as art and spurred the migration to Eurasia.

has been a popular explanation for the innovations of the Middle Stone Age. As population increases, the chance that someone will come up with an innovative idea also increases. At the same time, the probability that an idea will be lost decreases.

To test the hypothesis that a large increase in population drove Middle Stone Age innovation, Klein and Steele measured the shells of slow-growing mollusks found in Middle and Late Stone Age middens on the southern and western coasts of South Africa. They reasoned that selection pressure, caused by an increase in , would decrease median shell size. Frequent foraging by large numbers of humans would have prevented many shellfish from reaching their full size.

The researchers found that the median size of Middle Stone Age shells was larger than that of Late Stone Age shells. This showed that selection pressure, and therefore human population, was greater in the Late Stone Age than the Middle Stone Age. In addition, shellfish from smaller species were more common in Late Stone Age than new Stone Age sites. As selection pressure increased with population size, humans would be less likely to overlook smaller shellfish as a source of food.

Klein and Steele claim that because the population increase did not occur until after the migration out of Africa, which took place between 60,000 and 50,000 years ago, had already begun, there must be another explanation for the cultural advancements of the Middle Stone Age. This could be a change in the human genome or pressure causd by climate change.

Explore further: How dinosaur arms turned into bird wings

More information: Archaeological shellfish size and later human evolution in Africa, PNAS, Published online before print June 17, 2013, doi: 10.1073/pnas.1304750110

Abstract
Approximately 50 ka, one or more subgroups of modern humans expanded from Africa to populate the rest of the world. Significant behavioral change accompanied this expansion, and archaeologists commonly seek its roots in the African Middle Stone Age (MSA; ∼200 to ∼50 ka). Easily recognizable art objects and "jewelry" become common only in sites that postdate the MSA in Africa and Eurasia, but some MSA sites contain possible precursors, especially including abstractly incised fragments of ocher and perforated shells interpreted as beads. These proposed art objects have convinced most specialists that MSA people were behaviorally (cognitively) modern, and many argue that population growth explains the appearance of art in the MSA and its post-MSA florescence. The average size of rocky intertidal gastropod species in MSA and later coastal middens allows a test of this idea, because smaller size implies more intense collection, and more intense collection is most readily attributed to growth in the number of human collectors. Here we demonstrate that economically important Cape turban shells and limpets from MSA layers along the south and west coasts of South Africa are consistently and significantly larger than turban shells and limpets in succeeding Later Stone Age (LSA) layers that formed under equivalent environmental conditions. We conclude that whatever cognitive capacity precocious MSA artifacts imply, it was not associated with human population growth. MSA populations remained consistently small by LSA standards, and a substantial increase in population size is obvious only near the MSA/LSA transition, when it is dramatically reflected in the Out-of-Africa expansion.

Related Stories

Wet weather helped human culture grow (Update)

May 21, 2013

We moan about the wet weather all too often but it may have been crucial in the development of human culture from about 70,000 years onwards, according to scientists reporting in Nature Communications today. ...

Africa's Homo sapiens were the first techies

Dec 05, 2012

The search for the origin of modern human behaviour and technological advancement among our ancestors in southern Africa some 70 000 years ago, has taken a step closer to firmly establishing Africa, and especially ...

Beachcombing for early humans in Africa

Jun 03, 2013

(Phys.org) —From the earliest modern humans to the present day, our species has evolved dramatically in both biological and behavioural terms. What forces prompted these momentous changes?

Recommended for you

How dinosaur arms turned into bird wings

23 hours ago

Although we now appreciate that birds evolved from a branch of the dinosaur family tree, a crucial adaptation for flight has continued to puzzle evolutionary biologists. During the millions of years that elapsed, wrists went ...

User comments : 3

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

VendicarE
5 / 5 (1) Jun 18, 2013
People migrated out of Africa because they could.

There is no mystery.

Technology is needed to live in the north however. You have to be capable of bullding shelter for yourself and the animals you intend to slaughter over the winter. And you need to be able to gather enough plant material, to provide food during those months for both yoursle and those animals.

The principle benefit to living in the north comes from the fact that freezing temperatures reduce insect and animal parasitism, and insect born disease.
Torbjorn_Larsson_OM
5 / 5 (1) Jun 18, 2013
It is complex.

The primary area where sapiens migrated to was filled with neanderthals. They would have met initial local diseases as the met and mixed and brought their own that instead afflicted their competition. Later by natural resistance but also mixing they would largely have overcome the disease problems.

Hence it is interesting that this research see an immediate population increase. I suspect the selection effect of migration, promoting initiative and abilities, was a major influence from then on.
Anda
not rated yet Jun 19, 2013
Anyway all this study is based just in one assumption:
"They reasoned that selection pressure, caused by an increase in human population, would decrease median shell size."
Maybe or maybe not...