Original Australians numbered 1,000-3,000, study finds

Apr 23, 2013
This undated University of Southern Queensland photo shows a 28,000-year-old charcoal rock art fragment excavated from Arnhem land in Australia's Northern Territory. Australia was first settled by between 1,000 and 3,000 humans around 50,000 years ago, but the population crashed during the Ice Age before recovering to a peak of some 1.2 million people around five centuries ago, a study said.

Australia was first settled by between 1,000 and 3,000 humans around 50,000 years ago, but the population crashed during the Ice Age before recovering to a peak of some 1.2 million people around five centuries ago, a study said on Wednesday.

Estimating the early population of Australia is a source of debate in anthropology, partly because it touches on how European colonisation affected the country's indigenous people.

In an paper published by Britain's Royal Society, Alan Williams of the Australian National University in Canberra took a fresh look at investigations into ancient settlements where charcoal and other sources have been carbon-dated.

Using this data as a telltale of , Williams believes the first inhabitants of Australia arrived around 50,000 years ago and comprised a "founding group" of between 1,000 and 3,000 people.

This number is somewhat higher than previous estimates and suggests the first settlements were a result of deliberate migration rather than straggling, he says.

The newcomers crossed via a from , across a continental shelf that is now flooded, according to a common theory.

The numbers grew but then fell by as much as 60 percent between 21,000-18,000 years ago during the peak of the , when Australia became cooler and far drier than it is today, Williams believes.

At the end of the Ice Age, the population grew in fits and starts, reaching a peak of around 1.2 million 500 years ago.

It then went into slow decline to reach between 770,000 and 1.1 million by 1788, the start of British colonisation.

Europeans brought with them smallpox, measles, flu and other diseases that proved catastrophic for an without immunity.

Information about the demographic impact of colonisation is sketchy, but anthropologists say a starting point is to have a reliable figure of the population before European contact.

Past attempts to chart Australia's before contact have given hugely varying figures. They include a founding population of fewer than 150 people, and by 1788 as few as 250,000 and as many as 1.2 million.

The study appears in Proceedings of the Royal Society B.

Explore further: 110-million-year-old crustacean holds essential piece to evolutionary puzzle

More information: rspb.royalsocietypublishing.or… .1098/rspb.2013.0486

add to favorites email to friend print save as pdf

Related Stories

How the European conquest affected Native Americans

Jan 24, 2012

Researchers from Germany and the United States suggest that the European conquest triggered the loss of more than half the Native American population. The results of their study provide new insight into the ...

Recommended for you

Fish eye sheds light on color vision

Dec 23, 2014

A fish eye from a primitive time when Earth was but one single continent, has yielded evidence of color vision dating back at least 300 million years, researchers said Tuesday.

Study sheds new light on the diet of extinct animals

Dec 22, 2014

A study of tooth enamel in mammals living today in the equatorial forest of Gabon could ultimately shed light on the diet of long extinct animals, according to new research from the University of Bristol.

User comments : 3

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

BradynStanaway
3 / 5 (1) Apr 23, 2013
Thank you.
Irukanji
3 / 5 (2) Apr 23, 2013
50,000 years before the British came and sweet fuck all to show for it..

300 years since the British came, and even less to show for it.
Howard_Vickridge
5 / 5 (3) Apr 23, 2013
Irukanji, I agree that in 300 years since British colonisation, Australian Aborigines have little to show of any benefit from it. However, I disagree that the prior 50,000 years generated little to show. In a culture where materialism was not a priority, investment was rather more put into relationships and thinking and literature. The evidence that shows what was achieved over that huge pre-colonial history is not found in things, but in ways of being. The most devastating impact of colonisation on Australian Aborigines may have been the loss of cultural expression, for in those expressions lie the wisdoms that this culture has / had to offer humanity.

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more

Click here to reset your password.
Sign in to get notified via email when new comments are made.