Female animals portrayed as 'femme fatales' by researchers

March 1, 2013

Female animals are unfairly sexually stereotyped by researchers, according to experts at the University of St Andrews.

In a new report, the study suggests that cultural stereotypes may influence how we view animal .

Anthropomorphism – making animals seem like us – is a common problem for animal behaviour researchers. The effects can be quite obvious – giving animals human-like emotions for instance – or more subtle, using human cultural conventions or stereotypes to describe behaviour.

For instance, recent work has suggested that when it comes to sexual behaviour, researchers sometimes fall into a rather Victorian stereotype of the : males are considered dominant, strong and aggressive, whereas females are described as submissive, weak and passive. However, these stereotypes at best fail to capture the reality of male-female or at worst are just plain wrong.

Emily Burdfield-Steel, a member of the research group, said: "Our work suggests that scientists are not immune to cultural stereotypes and we need to think carefully about the words we use and what they convey."

The most obvious example where such stereotypes are wrong is sexual cannibalism: where it is females that are active killing, and eating males before or during sex.

So is the sexual cannibalism literature free of human stereotypes? To explore this question, researchers at the University of St Andrews compared the language used to describe sexual cannibalism, surveying the scientific literature on sexual and recording the words used to describe .

Perhaps unsurprisingly, the researchers found that females were more likely to be described with active words and males with reactive words.

More surprisingly though many of the words used to describe females, while active, were also rather negative. 

For example, females were described as "aggressive", "voracious" and "rapacious". Use of these words suggests that researchers risk perpetuating a negative stereotype of sexually aggressive females, akin to that of the femme fatale in noir cinema.

Their results are published online in .

Explore further: Sex in the morning or the evening?

More information: www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S000334721200557X

Related Stories

Sex in the morning or the evening?

June 26, 2007

Most research on sexual conflict ignores the fact that the fitness pay-offs of mating may change drastically over a short timescale, for example over a single day.

The best both of worlds -- how to have sex and survive

September 20, 2007

Researchers have discovered that even the gruesome and brutal lifestyle of the Evarcha culicivora, a blood gorging jumping spider indigenous to East Africa, can’t help but be tempted by that ‘big is beautiful’ mantra ...

In spiders, size matters: Small males are more often meals

September 10, 2008

Female spiders are voracious predators and consume a wide range of prey, which sometimes includes their mates. A number of hypotheses have been proposed for why females eat males before or after mating. Researchers Shawn ...

Urine sprays during courtship send mixed messages

March 29, 2010

Walking through urine drives crayfish into an aggressive sexual frenzy. Researchers writing in the open access journal BMC Biology suggest that a urine-mediated combination of aggressive and reproductive behaviour ensures ...

Researchers find gender bias in sexual cannibalism papers

January 17, 2013

(Phys.org)—A trio of biologists, Liam Dougherty, Emily Burdfield-Steel and David Shuker from the U.K.'s University of St Andrews, School of Biology, have found that when researchers write papers that are published in scientific ...

Recommended for you

Plastic in 99 percent of seabirds by 2050

August 31, 2015

Researchers from CSIRO and Imperial College London have assessed how widespread the threat of plastic is for the world's seabirds, including albatrosses, shearwaters and penguins, and found the majority of seabird species ...

Researchers unveil DNA-guided 3-D printing of human tissue

August 31, 2015

A UCSF-led team has developed a technique to build tiny models of human tissues, called organoids, more precisely than ever before using a process that turns human cells into a biological equivalent of LEGO bricks. These ...

Study shows female frogs susceptible to 'decoy effect'

August 28, 2015

(Phys.org)—A pair of researchers has found that female túngaras, frogs that live in parts of Mexico and Central and South America, appear to be susceptible to the "decoy effect." In their paper published in the journal ...

2 comments

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

extremity
3 / 5 (2) Mar 01, 2013
Really interesting article, and good research. But, still seems biased, and here is why.

They note in the journal that the females were larger than the males for all species reviewed. For this to really have a strong argument, we need to see that the ratio of F/M cannibalism occurring is close to equal, where approximately half of the articles are based on (f) eating (m), and vice-versa. If all of the females are bigger in all of the articles reviewed and a majority of cannibalism occurring is (f) eating (m) in the research, then one cannot conclude that the researchers have a gender bias, as there is not adequate information to compare it to.

Do not mistake me, I am not disagreeing. I think its solid research. But, if they can balance out the sources and find more articles based on cannibalism of (m) eating (f), and factor out papers by the same researcher, you can draw a VERY strong conclusion that can used and applied to other realms and all sorts of other areas of research.
deatopmg
2 / 5 (3) Mar 01, 2013
What was the ratio of m:f researchers accused of bias? How do their individual responses compare?

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more

Click here to reset your password.
Sign in to get notified via email when new comments are made.